It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by micpsi
If you have a link or two I will happily comment on that.
What I would say for now however is this,
Sir Robert Fellows is married to Diana’s sister, Lady Jane, I find it difficult to believe that he would be complicit in her murder.
edit on 6-1-2013 by OtherSideOfTheCoin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by boymonkey74
Guys you really think it is abnormal to have SIS officers in the closest capital city to us? Heck I would be surprised If we didn't have SIS officers in every capital city in Europe even the world.
reply to post by Logarock
Well it’s obvious that there were SIS officers present in Paris that night,
One of my contentions however is that the OP has not explained the significant of this and furthermore it does not prove that SIS had any role in assassinating Diana.
Originally posted by micpsi
You miss the crucial point. The two SIS officers arrived in Paris a FEWS DAYS BEFORE DIANA DIED. Now, either that is just a coincidence or else it was part of the conspiracy. I have proof that the crash was the result of a conspiracy, and so I believe that it was part of the preparations for what happened.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by micpsi
You miss the crucial point. The two SIS officers arrived in Paris a FEWS DAYS BEFORE DIANA DIED. Now, either that is just a coincidence or else it was part of the conspiracy. I have proof that the crash was the result of a conspiracy, and so I believe that it was part of the preparations for what happened.
I watched the video and it looks to me fiat uno is a very small unstable car car to cause
thr merc to wobble and crash
Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
You are a pilot so you have an understanding of momentum, the pivot point on an axis, deflection.
A small car can swerve or flip a larger car by striking the pivot point on the rear or front tyre. Traffic cops use a version of this technique to stop vehicles.
The danger point is around the axles of the car so you will be aiming at the centre of the tyre of the target vehicle to cause a spin. A smaller car may in fact be more dexterous at spinning a larger vehicle using this technique since brute force is not needed.
Why is it obvious that MI6 (SIS) agents were in Paris?
Everybody knows what MI5 and MI6 are
However your argument goes thusly:
>>>OP does not know that SIS is a collective term for MI5, MI6 therefore the OP cannot comprehend the article.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Originally posted by micpsi
You miss the crucial point. The two SIS officers arrived in Paris a FEWS DAYS BEFORE DIANA DIED. Now, either that is just a coincidence or else it was part of the conspiracy. I have proof that the crash was the result of a conspiracy, and so I believe that it was part of the preparations for what happened.
I watched the video and it looks to me fiat uno is a very small unstable car car to cause
thr merc to wobble and crash
One view is that someone was inside it operating a strobe light that blinded Henri Paul, as the former MI6 agent Richard Tomlinson alleged:
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by micpsi
One view is that someone was inside it operating a strobe light that blinded Henri Paul, as the former MI6 agent Richard Tomlinson alleged:
Richard Tomlinson is unreliable, he was sacked by SIS then tried to sue for unfair dismissal so when that didn’t work out he then broke the official secrets act with his book they sent him to prison and then when he got out fled to Russia and published a book “the big breach” in which he spent a lot of time bad mouthing his former employer. As well as publishing that particular book he also went and published a list of SIS offers names.
In the book he does discuss this “strobe light plan” it’s been a while since I have read the book but it was a plan he alleges to assassinate Milosevic, using a strobe light under a plan developed by the SBS for the Increment if my memory serves. SIS does not deny that this plan was discussed however point out that a number of his allegations made regarding the plan are wrong, for example the target was not Milosevic and in any case the plan was shelved.
All in all this guy hates his former employer and making accusations implicating them in Diana’s death is only to further his own agenda against his former employer. Just because he once saw a proposed plan written down in 1992 does not mean that they then used the same method to kill Diana.
Of course not. But your suggestion that he INVENTED the idea in the context of Diana's death merely as spite against his former employer is plain preposterous. A number of witnesses INDEPENDENTLY refer to a bright flash of light an instant before the car crashed.
Originally posted by boymonkey74
reply to post by micpsi
Prove it then.
According to the Unlawful Killing video the driver of the white car shot himself in the head twice before setting fire to his car.
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by LEL01
According to the Unlawful Killing video the driver of the white car shot himself in the head twice before setting fire to his car.
Unlawful killing is full of inaccuracies and it does not actually say that he shot himself twice in the head; it says a fire-fighter commented that it looked like he had been shot in the head.
It was later discovered that this was caused by the intense heat of the burning car.