What Was MI6 Team Doing In Paris The Night Princess Diana Died?

page: 17
29
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 11:20 AM
link   
Evidence that James Andanson was assassinated can be found here:
dianaunlawfullkilling.blogspot.co.uk...
The original magazine archives containing an intelligence dossier on Andanson from which this material is copied and pasted are no longer available.
edit on 6-1-2013 by micpsi because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 11:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by FlyingFox
iirc, surveillance outside the hotel revealed 2 blokes lingering outside for hours. They were dressed in UK style flight jackets w/o patches, and with the corresponding haircuts. if you saw the images, you'd know these guys were really fishy.



I would like to see the images you're talking about, do you have a link or something?
They might just be a couple of the guys on bikes in the tunnel that night.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 11:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
All in all this guy hates his former employer and making accusations implicating them in Diana’s death is only to further his own agenda against his former employer. Just because he once saw a proposed plan written down in 1992 does not mean that they then used the same method to kill Diana.
I would suggest that you delve further down this rabbit hole. After all...they couldn't very well laud him if he started acting against the interests of the intelligence community. Only a fool would suggest that those run concurrent with the interests of society at large.

Kinda' like Mike Vreeland. Suuure, he was into kiddy porn, and thereby tossed into a dungeon.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 11:38 AM
link   
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck
 


You can find out about his gripes with SIS online to summarise.


His girlfriend died, he became suicidal and depressed then he had a fall out with his line manager who eventually said he was not a “team player” and he was eventually sacked. So he tried to sue for unfair dismissal but found out he couldn’t because at the time SIS were exempt form UK tax laws, he then tried to publish a book that the British found out about which breached the official secrets act so he was sent to prison for a few months. He was released early on good behaviour and then went to Russia and got his book printed. One interesting side note is that in the 1996 first draft of the book he mentions the Strobe light plan in general terms then in the 1997 draft after Diana’s death then includes the stuff about doing it in a tunnel. Eventually he went on to give a list of SIS officers names to an online magazine and the British courts let him have his book sold in the UK but then the government said that all royalties where to be frozen. It’s been tit for tat ever since the sacked him.


He hates his old employer, they have admitted that there initial actions against him where harsh and have said they will alow him back into the UK as soon as he stops compromising national security.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 11:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck
 


You can find out about his gripes with SIS online to summarise.
You can also find his blog with a certain amount of digging, and then the comments sections that open up a few more doors. There are only two lines of inquiry I have ever dropped out of concern for my own security. This was one.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 11:56 AM
link   
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
 


Unlawful killing is full of inaccuracies in your opinion, are you really trying to tell me that the intense heat of the burning car created wounds that appeared to be bullet wounds? I'm not buying it.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 12:14 PM
link   
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck
 





There are only two lines of inquiry I have ever dropped out of concern for my own security. This was one.


Could you please clarify that point or send me a U2U.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 12:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck
 


There are only two lines of inquiry I have ever dropped out of concern for my own security. This was one.
Could you please clarify that point or send me a U2U.
Quite simply, one I was warned off of, and the other became alarming.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 12:53 PM
link   
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck
 


Can you be more specific right now you are being very vague some details I think would be very interesting.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 01:55 PM
link   
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
 
Let's just say that the net is a very active place, and for anyone good at discerning patterns and connections...there can be surprises. In one case I was bluntly advised by an ATS member not to go there, and in the other I was a 'press enter' away from exposing my investigations into a fairly sordid scandal. Sometimes you need to weigh your options. In this digital world there is no real anonymity and a great deal of vulnerability.

Just so members don't think they can plink away with impunity, eh?



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 02:18 PM
link   
reply to post by ipsedixit
 


Thanks for posting that video, so far it's very interesting.
For those who won't or can't watch it.

John King knew guys who were in the elite forces, he said the guy he was talking with was CIA hired by MI6. He was told of a planned high level assassin a week before Diana was killed. He was told this death would be bigger than JFK.

Publishing his book was blocked then distribution of it was difficult but at least we can get it now if we want to.
He had three sources for his information, one worked for the Government, another is an MI5 officer still serving, and the other one worked for another Military Intelligence department.

A chest containing letters and videos went missing and at this point in the video you can hear a helicopter hovering above the building.
I'm only 20 minutes into this, I haven't got to what else they told him yet.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 03:57 PM
link   
I should have said his book is called Princess Diana, Evidence of Assassination.

Prince Charles couldn't marry Camilla while Diana was still alive, if he did then he couldn't be head of the church and the church wouldn't be able to sit in Parliament and the House of Lords.

MI5 wanted to get rid of Camilla but MI6 wanted to get rid of Diana, we know who won that one.
About 6 weeks before Diana died Camilla was in a car accident, traffic accidents are a known assassination technique. Diana's bodyguard and former lover Sergeant Barry Mannakee was also killed in a car accident in 1985 by MI5 according to Diana.

I don't understand how this works but they put a microchip in the car so they can control it.

The blood sample that was supposed to be the drivers was labelled unknown male. Two bodyguards testified to say he was not drunk and they wouldn't have let him drive the car if he had been drunk.

This has happened to a few people, those who survived say they lost control of the car and the brakes failed just as another car was overtaking them.
I've still got over an hour of this to watch.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 04:06 PM
link   
reply to post by LEL01
 


Check this out:




15 years after her death new evidence has emerged that Diana was murdered by MI6 ‘Boston brakes’…
New Evidence Diana Was Murdered By MI6

By Richard Coleman

The ‘Boston Brakes’

Following the 2008 Royal Inquest debacle, which ruled out MI6 involvement in Diana’s death, new evidence has come to light which challenges the ‘official verdict’.


www.consciousape.com...




In their book, Princess Diana: The Evidence , authors Jon King and John Beveridge present evidence that a highly sophisticated assassination technique was used to cause the princess’s vehicle to crash as it drove through the Alma tunnel, Paris, in the early hours of August 31st, 1997.

The ‘Boston brakes’, they reveal, is the most favoured assassination technique employed by the West’s intelligence services due to its deniability.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 04:18 PM
link   
reply to post by LEL01
 



Ok so I have just lost an hour and thirty eight minutes of my life listening to that Jon King babbling about his book.


Essentially he is saying that a week before Diana’s death a source of his called “Stealth” informed him that there would be a Assassination bigger than the assassination of JFK. A week later, Diana is dead, further to this he also claims that Sir Reynolds Fines informed him about a technique used in assassination called “the Boston Breaks” in which a microchip takes control of the vehicles steering and breaks and this resulted in Diana’s death.


It’s all rubbish, does he really expect us to believe that the guy who is was the editor of X-files magazine at the time is going to have all these sources inside British and American intelligence and that they would chose him to confide in.


I found myself laughing at times watching that, like when he was seriously talking about the microchip that controls a car’s steering and that this existed in 1986. For the record, Barry Mannakee died in a motorcycle accident not in a car.


Really when I was watching this I was embarrassed for this guy.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 04:18 PM
link   
reply to post by DoorKnobEddie
 


Yes that's the guy, the author of that book, he's the one talking in the video on page 15 of this thread, it's really good if you can find the time to watch it. That's where I'm getting the information from in my last 2 posts.

Did you look for that picture of Diana in Unlawful Killing? it shows the other one is fake.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 04:21 PM
link   
reply to post by LEL01
 


Does that mean then that you believe that the cause of the crash was this mysterious microchip, you know the one that can drive cars.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 04:25 PM
link   
reply to post by LEL01
 


I did see the photo and it is the type of injury passengers who do not wear a seat belt in the back get.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 04:27 PM
link   
reply to post by LEL01
 



What picture’s any links?



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 04:30 PM
link   
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
 


It's just your opinion that it's all rubbish, I understand, you won't believe anything that's not the official story but at least you have been good enough to watch the videos. You're ahead of me on that, I'm still trying to find time to watch this one but the kitchen keeps calling me away from it.



posted on Jan, 6 2013 @ 04:37 PM
link   
reply to post by LEL01
 


No what’s rubbish is that a microchip can remotely control a cars steering and breaks, these are mechanical functions, and they rely on levers and gears, not on microchips so the idea that a microchip caused the crash really is rubbish as it has nothing to interact with.

Remember he claims this was also done in 1986……





new topics
top topics
 
29
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join