I sat reading some of the Threads here on ATS...
Ban the Gun, Repeal the Second Amendment
It covers a British individual falsely trying to claim guns kill people....
Was there a second gunman involved in this recent school shooting?
A thread on the speculation and proof over a second shooter
Mass Shooting Conspiracy...
a thread trying to cover the information being hidden
one poster even mentioned reports of a 'police officer' in the building before the cops got there....
None of these threads are mine, but I have chosen to follow them because of the nature of the events not feeling right...
This has been brewing in my head for a day or two... The final piece came last night...
Yes it appears the liberals want to make sure america is unarmed..
The problem is that they are not that smart
nor do they have the political will
and my central philosophy is that it is about power not about whats right...
It is that last part that is key...
Every american can agree that the people in washington are NOT looking after them...
With this in mind it hit me..
I am a corrupt politician who has sold all the sheep my product... what do I want
CT police warn of possible
In a weekend press conference, Lieutenant Paul Vance told the media that the "misinformation" being shared on social media sites has become a "major
concern." Vance further stated his department has had discussions with federal authorities about the plausibility of pursuing charges against those
who intentionally share false information or who may try to impersonate the shooter, his family, or anyone else involved in the situation.
"It is important to note that we have discussed with federal authorities [that] these issues are crimes," Vance said. "They will be investigated and
prosecutions will take place."
Add in a dash of another thread here
Facebook now suspending Accounts which question Mainstream Media Reporting/Account of
A questionable thread... however I have noticed the trend on other websites... where people get those in charge to remove material they find to be
Wikipedia, Facebook, Twitter, Military.com, and Youtube are all very guilty of this
It made me think a lot over this... what tools do you have in place for a control measure
What happens if you try to use the NDAA bluntly... You will get the response similar to SOPA... everyone up in arms over you taking power... no you
have to get them to give it to you...
You see the tactic here is to make it look like your aiming for the guns and settle for SOPA like control
Guess what not to many people are going to argue against it...
You do not think it is gonna work...
Define Free speech
Now think real hard about those definition
The courts have placed rules into place that curtail free speech
- can you yell fire in a theater
-[I can't define what is pornography.] "But I know it when I see it."
popular paraphrase of Potter Stewart, opinion in Jacobellis v. Ohio (1964)
-the arrest of the man who made the film that supposedly made the anti-muslim film... it supposedly caused the mid-east to riot three months into its
trailers and movie release
Now the reasoning
Your first move is not to take the guns.... it is in the plans but it is not the first move...
You limit communication... this way you deny your opponent as much of his ability to mount a resistance as possible...
FISA warrants for library patrons list
Citizens United v FEC
no vetting of the president during 1st campaign
Taken all together..
1) there was an extra person at the school and it is being covered up ... making this an execution
2) it was done for control... the evidence points to the first amendment not the second
My final bit of proof... it should take about ninety days for the first officers involved in the shooting to be dead.. they have seen the face of the
Your not going to overcome the guns rights lobby... however you can fluff the gun lobby and pull the ole switcheroo last minute and hit the 1st
My gf asked the most important question in all of this...
Why kill a group of children?
You have to have a touch of evil to understand this motive. Washington has it in spades... A nation numb to this violence can be goosed for one thing
afterwards... The first set of killing did not have the effect wanted so ... This gives them a one shot to get something...
I would go after the First amendment... It allows you to control the narrative and civility of the conversation... your opponents lose before the
conversation begins... you can strip guns by region at your leisure with no argument because you control communication...
edit on 18-12-2012
by ripcontrol because: newspeak is not freespeak