It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by oper8zhin
Originally posted by kingsquirel
America do not let foreigners who not have a clue the rights you have, whom not the thought of what it is to bear rights, whom not the thought of free speach, whom not the thought of a country that granted you a right to lawyer, and jurisprudence, and the right for trial by your accusator.
YES, ITS THE BRITS ESPECIALLY WHO NEED TO KEEP THEIR NOSES OUT OF AMERICAS BUSINESS.
Frankly, Americans KNOW BETTER than to give up our rights like the Brits have done. Does anyone KNOW that if a gang of THUGS break into a Brit's home and RAPES their wife and daughter, that the man of the house will go TO JAIL FOR DEFENDING AGAINST SAID THUGS who broke into his HOME and is now RAPING his wife and daughter??? HE GOES TO JAIL FOR DEFENDING HIS OWN HOME, HIS WIFE, AND HIS DAUGHTER INSIDE OF THEIR OWN HOME!!!!
America doesnt need that CRAP. NO WAY. NO WAY!!!!! In America, those thugs would NOT even get close to HARMING the home owners wife or daughter. That threat would be NEUTRALIZED before ANY HARM has been committed.
Whats that popular phrase used by Brits? Oh yea, "PISS OFF". Thats WHAT they can do instead of minding Americas business.
edit on 15-12-2012 by oper8zhin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DPrice
Originally posted by oper8zhin
Originally posted by kingsquirel
America do not let foreigners who not have a clue the rights you have, whom not the thought of what it is to bear rights, whom not the thought of free speach, whom not the thought of a country that granted you a right to lawyer, and jurisprudence, and the right for trial by your accusator.
YES, ITS THE BRITS ESPECIALLY WHO NEED TO KEEP THEIR NOSES OUT OF AMERICAS BUSINESS.
Frankly, Americans KNOW BETTER than to give up our rights like the Brits have done. Does anyone KNOW that if a gang of THUGS break into a Brit's home and RAPES their wife and daughter, that the man of the house will go TO JAIL FOR DEFENDING AGAINST SAID THUGS who broke into his HOME and is now RAPING his wife and daughter??? HE GOES TO JAIL FOR DEFENDING HIS OWN HOME, HIS WIFE, AND HIS DAUGHTER INSIDE OF THEIR OWN HOME!!!!
America doesnt need that CRAP. NO WAY. NO WAY!!!!! In America, those thugs would NOT even get close to HARMING the home owners wife or daughter. That threat would be NEUTRALIZED before ANY HARM has been committed.
Whats that popular phrase used by Brits? Oh yea, "PISS OFF". Thats WHAT they can do instead of minding Americas business.
edit on 15-12-2012 by oper8zhin because: (no reason given)
Typical closed minded hysteria I expect from a certain type of poster. No one in Britain will go to jail for defending their family from intruders (who themselves are unlikely to be armed with a gun). The law was recently strengthened to reflect this. I'm assuming you don't own a passport and have never left whatever state you reside in.
If you don't want Brits commenting on 'America's business' then don't post things on an internet site that is viewable by anyone.
Originally posted by oper8zhin
Originally posted by DPrice
Originally posted by oper8zhin
Originally posted by kingsquirel
America do not let foreigners who not have a clue the rights you have, whom not the thought of what it is to bear rights, whom not the thought of free speach, whom not the thought of a country that granted you a right to lawyer, and jurisprudence, and the right for trial by your accusator.
YES, ITS THE BRITS ESPECIALLY WHO NEED TO KEEP THEIR NOSES OUT OF AMERICAS BUSINESS.
Frankly, Americans KNOW BETTER than to give up our rights like the Brits have done. Does anyone KNOW that if a gang of THUGS break into a Brit's home and RAPES their wife and daughter, that the man of the house will go TO JAIL FOR DEFENDING AGAINST SAID THUGS who broke into his HOME and is now RAPING his wife and daughter??? HE GOES TO JAIL FOR DEFENDING HIS OWN HOME, HIS WIFE, AND HIS DAUGHTER INSIDE OF THEIR OWN HOME!!!!
America doesnt need that CRAP. NO WAY. NO WAY!!!!! In America, those thugs would NOT even get close to HARMING the home owners wife or daughter. That threat would be NEUTRALIZED before ANY HARM has been committed.
Whats that popular phrase used by Brits? Oh yea, "PISS OFF". Thats WHAT they can do instead of minding Americas business.
edit on 15-12-2012 by oper8zhin because: (no reason given)
Typical closed minded hysteria I expect from a certain type of poster. No one in Britain will go to jail for defending their family from intruders (who themselves are unlikely to be armed with a gun). The law was recently strengthened to reflect this. I'm assuming you don't own a passport and have never left whatever state you reside in.
If you don't want Brits commenting on 'America's business' then don't post things on an internet site that is viewable by anyone.
Yea they changed it a bit recently but it all falls what they consider "reasonable force". The TRUTH IS THAT IN BRITTAN YOU CAN GO TO JAIL FOR PROTECTING YOUR HOME, YOUR WIFE, AND YOUR DAUGHTER. That is FACT. And its even SADDER that you Brit's ALLOWED THEM TO STRIP YOU OF YOUR RIGHTS TO GET TO THAT POINT.
You Brits should be VERY ASHAMED for yourselves. Americans do not need that CRAP here. Some good advice for the Brits who have let their Rights all be taken away is maybe spending LESS OF YOUR LIFE in the Pubs" over there, so that you could maintain enough SOBRIETY to NOT let all of your FREEDOMS be trampled and taken away. YES???
YES.
Originally posted by whatsecret
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
I wish something positive could come from all this but it will not. The Powers in control are just going to use this to push their agenda, they do it everytime a mass shooting occurs, pointing at gun control.
This morning on CNN a criminal lawyer made it very clear that the only gun control adjustment that would possibly stop something like this would be to ban ALL guns EVERYWHERE. Because in Connecticut you need a permit to purchase a gun, that means a background check including criminal record and mental health assessment together with a classroom training and a test. The guns used yesterday were legally purchased by the monsters mother.
Originally posted by CoolStoryMan
I think it's perfectly reasonable to be stricter on guns, i'm not calling for a ban, also i see no reason for assault weapons to be legal unless you own a certain amount of property(such as ranchers on the borders for instance)
Originally posted by peter vlar
Please take this with a grain of salt but I can't continue reading this without saying something. As a gun loving an gun owning American I beg you to stop and quit while you're ahead.
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by VforVendettea
This is what the police will do.... its their job to stop these things.
When theres a camera on every corner and the smart phone in your pocket is the eyes and ears of an artificial intelligence the police will be alerted of the crime before it even happens. Quadrotors with tazers might be able to respond and icapacitate a criminal before the police arrive.
We need to think about the problems of living in a 22nd century world. The potential colateral damage that a personal firearm could cause if used innapropriately is more than anyone could prepare for.
When society is cashless theft will be nearly impossible.. When every pindrop is monitored crime will become nearly impossible...
We need to depend on eachother as a society... and trust the people that we have trying to protect us.
Originally posted by whatsecret
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by VforVendettea
This is what the police will do.... its their job to stop these things.
When theres a camera on every corner and the smart phone in your pocket is the eyes and ears of an artificial intelligence the police will be alerted of the crime before it even happens. Quadrotors with tazers might be able to respond and icapacitate a criminal before the police arrive.
We need to think about the problems of living in a 22nd century world. The potential colateral damage that a personal firearm could cause if used innapropriately is more than anyone could prepare for.
When society is cashless theft will be nearly impossible.. When every pindrop is monitored crime will become nearly impossible...
We need to depend on eachother as a society... and trust the people that we have trying to protect us.
I hope you are being facetious. Really!
Originally posted by oper8zhin
YES, ITS THE BRITS ESPECIALLY WHO NEED TO KEEP THEIR NOSES OUT OF AMERICAS BUSINESS.
Frankly, Americans KNOW BETTER than to give up our rights like the Brits have done. Does anyone KNOW that if a gang of THUGS break into a Brit's home and RAPES their wife and daughter, that the man of the house will go TO JAIL FOR DEFENDING AGAINST SAID THUGS who broke into his HOME and is now RAPING his wife and daughter??? HE GOES TO JAIL FOR DEFENDING HIS OWN HOME, HIS WIFE, AND HIS DAUGHTER INSIDE OF THEIR OWN HOME!!!!
America doesnt need that CRAP. NO WAY. NO WAY!!!!! In America, those thugs would NOT even get close to HARMING the home owners wife or daughter. That threat would be NEUTRALIZED before ANY HARM has been committed.
Whats that popular phrase used by Brits? Oh yea, "PISS OFF". Thats WHAT they can do instead of minding Americas business.
Originally posted by peter vlar
To Exponent I would add that the US constitution while borrowing some ideas from the Magna Carta it was much more Influenced by the Iroquois confederation. Just thought I'd throw that out there since everyone continues to bandy on about the lack of historical knowledge or context.
Originally posted by OOOOOO
The United Kingdom banned gun ownership outright because of a school shooting. Did the crime rate go down? No, violent crime has skyrocketed ever since the ban on all gun ownership. It is now illegal for the Homeowner to resist a criminal that invades a home. A person has no right to defend himself and his home if he is attacked if a weapon other then a gun is used also will be arrested. The defender will get more jail time then the criminal. That is England
link www.thelonestarwatchdog.com...
Originally posted by OOOOOO
Israel learned to put guns in the schools when a bus full of school children were murdered. They realized back in the 1970s that arming the schools was the solution, not restricting the right of self defense.edit on 15-12-2012 by OOOOOO because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OOOOOO
Do not blame the gun for the massacre. Blame the individual for the act. Blame strict gun control laws and the ridicules rules of engagement used by the Police preventing them from responding effectively
Where the government has restricted the right to keep and bear arms and the right to self defense. Violent crime explodes afterward, the people are disarmed and restricted not to defend themselves. The United Kingdom banned gun ownership outright because of a school shooting. Did the crime rate go down? No, violent crime has skyrocketed ever since the ban on all gun ownership.
It is now illegal for the Homeowner to resist a criminal that invades a home. A person has no right to defend himself and his home if he is attacked if a weapon other then a gun is used also will be arrested. The defender will get more jail time then the criminal. That is England
Israel learned to put guns in the schools when a bus full of school children were murdered. They realized back in the 1970s that arming the schools was the solution, not restricting the right of self defense.edit on 15-12-2012 by OOOOOO because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kingsquirel
Been on ATS for a bit, and have observed several members whom do not have a constitution, but rather if their lucky a bill of rights, and some do not have that, whom want to get involved with America, and its 2nd Amendment rights. So hear is what i say: America do not let foreigners who not have a clue the rights you have, whom not the thought of what it is to bear rights, whom not the thought of free speach, whom not the thought of a country that granted you a right to lawyer, and jurisprudence, and the right for trial by your accusator. Most forget, to soon, that America set the precedence with the legal standard, as it once was a hierachial chain, and if you where not in the top down from two, your family was worthless. So let us not forget what America has done for all people, if not a bill of rights, to stopping slavery. You decide, however, from the posts that I have observed tonight, some are making me ill, and I love America: As it is the first nation that had the fiefs more than bardered slaves, and sets the precedence throughout the world, and if this nation failes, guess what so to will every other nations, "bill of rights.' Nothing but love for my country."edit on 14-12-2012 by kingsquirel because: (no reason given)edit on 14-12-2012 by kingsquirel because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OOOOOO
reply to post by exponent
Your not to bright either, the article is saying gun control does not work, what works is arming the school with arm guards, that people with guns in case you don't know.
And a again I only brought this to light, read the link bozo, bitch in comments there I don't need to hear your lips flapping.
edit on 15-12-2012 by OOOOOO because: (no reason given)