posted on Dec, 1 2012 @ 08:49 AM
reply to post by onecraftydude
Originally posted by onecraftydude
I will admit some of the things claimed in the video are wrong. The planes are not "spraying blood".
How do you know?
I also want to point out that nearly everyone on a plane will have a camera nowadays.
How do you know?
We should use those to record what we see.
Using any instrument for its primary purpose does make sense.
If it can be shown that 2 airplanes at the same altitude produce completely different contrails we will be proving the main argument against
By different, do you mean in appearance or chemical composition? If you can clearly demonstrate difference in chemical composition, then yes, I would
want to see that.
I know what arguments will come about and I know what both sides say about these contrails.
So you admit the trails produced by these aircraft are in fact CONTRAILS! MOST EXCELLENT!
What I want to know is why are these aircraft not on radar...
Who says they are not on radar? There is nothing on the video that states definitively the aircraft are not on radar.
...and why are they so
close to civilian aircraft with obvious chemtrails.
If that is a refueling aircraft it has tremendous capacity for fuel/other storage.
All planes (of the types shown in the video) can be modified in one way or another for specific purposes (hence FedEx planes, KC tankers, etc.)
The storage tanks can supply the engines just as easily as another plane so they make a great sprayer platform.
KC tankers do not make use of their storage tanks for fueling the plane. That fuel is is reserved for refueling other planes.
Military pilots will keep their mouths shut.
So, all military pilots would keep their mouths shut, even though they know they are subjecting humanity to a deadly scourge of harmful chemicals.
Including their own families. You would do that? How do you think we found out about Agent Orange?
Seems awfully convenient to me. I will add that there is a precedent for this thought so it is not conspiracy "Theory".
What is convenient? The store down the street? What precedent?
edit on 1-12-2012 by totallackey because: Further content