AIPAC, decapitators inside US government: Intelligence analyst

Obama?? Who is the first President to have an 'official' corporate sponsor, aka 'gpldman sachs'. This article is written by Gordon Duff, editor for Veteran's Today, whom in the last 3 years has been the most unreliable intel one could digest.The only ones Obama is purging are constitutionalists and Freedom fighters.

Originally posted by infowarrior9970

Originally posted by SLAYER69
Either that or it's simply those Evil Jews at it again.

that's a misrepresentation of the Jewish people.

The zionists are a whole different entity and barely reflect the true Jewish way of life.

don't lump the 2 together.

there are extremists in EVERY group of people.

He already knows. The "Evil Jews" deflection is usually used by Neo so I was surprised to here it come from slayer. There is no "Evil Jew" crowd but there certainly is anti-Zionist crowd. It's tiresome to see certain members constanly push the agenda that if you criticize the obvious Zionist influence on American foreign and domestic policy then you are labeled as an "Evil Jew" hater.

The enlightened members can see right through this tactic and it no longer works, not even the agenda driven fools who use this tactic believe it, it's a smoke screen to stop intelligent discussion on the matter.

As for this thread, it should be in the hoax forum as there is no evidence that Obama is going to rid the USA of the Zionists as they already own it. If they get rid of AIPAC and all the dual citizens then I will come back and apologize, until then don't get your hopes up people.

reply to post by jude11


Things like this have been covered before.
No one cares.
As long as we have American Idol or XFactor to watch.

reply to post by jude11


I'm confused.

Isn't this just Obama signing a new bill to make plans to deal with inside breaches of national security? I fail to see any suggestion that this is a move to clean anything up, just a statement of the obvious - that agencies and government departments need to develop more ways to monitor and secure systems and information.

Also, why is it automatically Zionists he's going after? I would suggest that it's far more plausible that there are rogue Republican extremists in government which pose more of a threat to national security than any other group out there.

The Republican extremist element has become far more dangerous over the last four years, with the party almost splitting down the middle. Half of it wants to move on and become relevant again, and half is becoming more religiously, racially and economically extreme by the day. The Republican party is about to break into two, and there will be remnants of both groups within government.

It seems much more plausible to me that some advisor or think tank has come to the same conclusion many other people around the world have come to - the US is increasingly unstable from an economic standpoint, and the Republican party is about to split between the extremists and the moderates.

Think about it, if you have members of a party throughout your government, and that party is about to fracture into extreme and moderate groups, you would want to weed out those extremists too. That's what I think this is about. He knows that there is a risk of a rogue right-wing element in government, and he's working to make sure all departments are prepared to look into it and remove them before the Republican party officially breaks apart.

reply to post by detachedindividual


I think if anything at all comes from this memorandum it will be directed against everyone but the Zionists in the USA. Many members including your self mentioned some good possibilities such as the right wing extremists (please be aware I'm not gullible enough to believe in the bipartisan distraction meant to divide the nation), China and other nations who are known for spying are another plaulsible example that was mentioned, and of course the whistleblowers...you can't have people exposing the truth

@ the OP (Jude) I meant no offense that this thread belongs in the hoax bin, it's just I saw this article when it first came out on whatreallyhappened.com and right away I could tell they misinterpreted the content of what they were analyzing. I usually agree with a lot of their commentary.

My comment about this belonging in the hoax bin was mostly due to the title, but you did state you are not completely sold on this so I apologize if I came off as rude as I usually agree with what you post and enjoy your threads.

This thread though, due to the whatreallyhapppened.com spin that was put into it, is misleading as in my opinion there is no evidence that Obama has any intention of getting rid of the Zionists who are deep within the American political structure.

Peace.

If the story is true, Looks to me as a future safe gaurd against a coup d'état.

reply to post by jude11


Your interpretation is 100% bogus.

reply to post by VwMk1


I think we just witnessed a failed attempt.

Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by detachedindividual

 

I think if anything at all comes from this memorandum it will be directed against everyone but the Zionists in the USA. Many members including your self mentioned some good possibilities such as the right wing extremists (please be aware I'm not gullible enough to believe in the bipartisan distraction meant to divide the nation), China and other nations who are known for spying are another plaulsible example that was mentioned, and of course the whistleblowers...you can't have people exposing the truth

You might not believe the bipartisan distraction, and I too believe that leadership is the same whichever party holds power, but those in government do believe, passionately, that their "team" is worth cheering for.

We might be able to see past the charade, but there are potentially thousands of government staff and military who are totally dedicated to their party and have no common sense when it comes to the play being acted out before them.

That is the issue here. It doesn't matter what is true, it matters what is believed. And there are thousands within government who believe that Obama is a Socialist, or believe that faith in God is what's needed, or that an attack on Israel is a necessity.

Those who believe that the party games are just that, games, are a minority. Intentions and actions often come from belief, not from truth.

reply to post by jude11


WHAT?? That is...what? I'm at a loss for words! I hope this is true.

en.wikipedia.org...

Payload Specialist: Ilan Ramon, a colonel in the Israeli Air Force and the first Israeli astronaut.

I would rate the likely effectiveness of implementation, somewhere between fat chance and no chance. You're dreaming Barry.

reply to post by XLR8R


Its NOT true, jeez, whats the matter with you people?

Originally posted by jude11

Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by jude11

 

Between leaks Ft Hood events and attempts on his life I think the President is going to make sure upstarts don't get to start up. Where's the problem? Why is everything suspect. This man is not among TPTB. He is a pawn in place to pacify the people, make us think we have a Democracy.

There are 400 of Americans first families in charge.
They are the Heritage Foundation Families and largest is the Waltons who own Walmarts.
It is only a matter of time before we are the United States of Walmart.

The REAL problem is that he believes he's in charge. And while he's at the helm...

But let's look from another angle. What if he is truly in charge with the backing of the elite and we are only being led to believe he isn't?

Peace

He is a waiting period. The elite work in hundreds of years. They can certainly wait out this guy.

What if? You aren't going to get anti establishment players like Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich into these politics. We already see that. You have to be members of a certain fraternity to even be nominated and considered by TPTB. They then spread their influence among vast empires of money and power. In that way maybe Obama is a pay to play player but I think he imagined the President actually had power to break a deadlock in either supporting power, House or Senate. He has no such power but he CAN support and influence and facilitate one thing over another.

When looking from afar I don't see Obama associating with the most monetarily influenced men on the planet.

And if he is caught bowing lower than he should to some dictator we despise - I don't think much of it when I have already caught Dick Cheney and George Bush and a Saudi Prince hugging, kissing, and strolling holding hands. There is your PTB. That betrothal is complicity.

TPTB only support "pet" organizations begun by their own family members like "The Heritage Foundation" and like to decry other social programs spending their money.
One of the biggest accusations against Obama is his UNwillingness to cut those social programs. (although to your point he has thrown SS & Medicare into a bargain) but generally Obama appears opposite of a ruthless, monetarily influenced dictator, and opposite to an austerity plan more likely devised by the ruling elite. That might have been Romneys plan. Let's face it - he favored the wealthy and first ID profile element of your ruling elite - THEY ARE GOING TO BE YOUR WEALTHIEST ALSO BECAUSE - (to put it in simple language and theory) DEALER TAKES ALL TIES. And they are the dealers.

7 pages and no award for most dramatic thread title of the year?

disappoint

The memorandum seems vague but the zionist cabal certainly fits the bill.

As for the western media it is totally biased pro-capitalist propaganda.

The bankers are the symptom and free trade capitalism is the disease!

Someone eventually does not need to step up to the plate and put the globalist demonic power brokers in their place, aka prison. But it needs to be a group effort as much as possible and make the enemy known so that the billionares and trillionares can only make martyrs if they choose violence as retaliation. Then the people with their own weapons will go after these criminals alone since the judicial system and executive branches are corrupt beyond repair.

Originally posted by Sovaka
reply to post by jude11

 

Well if the Elite still have a bit of power to stop him, expect him dead within the next year.

If anything happens to him, we know who the scumbags were that did it and that would be something I'm willing to go to war for. Carpet bombing Israel would be quite the change from their usual bombing Palastine.

This accomplishes only 1 thing - and that 1 thing isn't good for America! This cracks down on whistleblowers and leakers. This allows the government to effectively threaten and severely punish anyone who may have access to information that could prove dangerous to the government's plans - including martial law, dictatorial decrees or other illegal activity being perpetrated against US citizens. In other words, this allows the government to operate in a way where they would no longer have concerns for being exposed.

Nope, I don't see this as a good thing at all. There are already laws on the books to deal with sedition, traitors, sabateurs and espionage. There is no need for this other than what I have stated.

Originally posted by jude11
Exact thread title from here:
whatreallyhappened.com...

So what do we have here?

I am shocked to see this and ask others to weigh in on the implications of such a move by Obama.

It's stated that he is not exactly referring to AIPAC or Israel exactly but is also stated that he couldn't be talking about anyone else. Could he?

And the title here;

AIPAC, decapitators inside US government: Intelligence analyst

The President’s text below, unedited: The White House Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release November 21, 2012

Seventy hours ago, at this writing, while on Air Force One, President Barack Obama issued a press release that has been utterly ignored by the Western Press. The president has openly announced a move against violent plotters inside the US government and espionage agents. He does not use the terms “AIPAC” or “the Israel lobby” but it is highly unlikely he could be referring to anything else. Read more at investmentwatchblog.com...

There is, currently, within the US military, the Executive branch of government and among extremist “power brokers” in America an active plot to “alter” America’s form of government through “decapitation.” www.presstv.ir...

And here: www.whitehouse.gov...

Presidential Memorandum -- National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies Subject: National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs This Presidential Memorandum transmits the National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs (Minimum Standards) to provide direction and guidance to promote the development of effective insider threat programs within departments and agencies to deter, detect, and mitigate actions by employees who may represent a threat to national security. These threats encompass potential espionage, violent acts against the Government or the Nation, and unauthorized disclosure of classified information, including the vast amounts of classified data available on interconnected United States Government computer networks and systems. More: www.presstv.ir...

The question of the moment, however, is this: How can a President of the United States announce that the government is infiltrated with terrorists and spies and no newspaper, television network or other form of media notices?

So what can we conclude from this?

Peace

edit on 25-11-2012 by jude11 because: (no reason given)

[slaps forehead]

Talk about grasping at straws... there's NO REASON to think that the memo, as worded, has anything to do with Israel or Jews (and Iranian State TV isn't a proper source for info about, "zionists").

This policy does not say that there ARE terrorists that have infiltrated .. it's setting forth a standard to detect, deter and deal with them..

It's good to have such a policy in place..

Creating a policy that dictates that you will do a background check and not hire those with a felony is a good policy for example, it doesn't mean you already have..

Also the president's policy doesn't mention Zionist anywhere in it .. so that's a bit of a stretch, though I'm not surprised given the sources... I get that you took the title from the first article, but you could have easily taken the title from the actual release instead, yeah I know.. less shocking... but more accurate...

"National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs"