It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lee anoma
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by MisterMarbles
Would you rather have 50 million people stealing your food at gunpoint?
I would rather have them working and feeding themselves.
Oh well that's simple then.
Hire them.
- Lee
Originally posted by MisterMarbles
Are you really telling me the billions of dollars that have been donated to charity has been wasted? Do you really think our society would be a better place if no one donated anything to the needy? I hope not. If so, I have nothing more to say to you.
In the context of this thread, we are talking about who pays for the basic necessities of life for those who can't afford it while living in the wealthiest country on the planet. Since the OP is clearly not even a multi-millionaire and has such a huge problem with a fraction of his taxes going towards feeding poor people, I proposed shifting the fiscal responsibility to people who should feel a lot less "taken" than the OP and his supporters.
In other words, unless you're a really greedy person with an 8 or 9+ figure net worth, my proposals don't hurt you, the OP or people like you at all. They would actually help you and people a lot poorer than you.
Originally posted by SymbolicLogic
I just zeroed one of my bank accounts before I applied for food stamps after months of looking for work, even though I qualified prior.... I'm going to read this thread in its entirety, and if I see anyone complaining how we are a bunch of "useless eaters" I'm going to flip out.
I think the biggest misconception people get is that conservatives, libertarians, aren't against people who have to use foodstamps.
We're against the conditions, the policies that precipitated the use.
Originally posted by curlygirl
reply to post by MisterMarbles
I'd like them to try and they would be facing my gun point. My tax dollars are being used inefficiently to feed people that should be feeding themselves. If the government stopped handing out free food, these people might get off the couch and find something more constructive to do like start a business, work, etc. The past twenty years of government have been failures. America is no longer the empire it used to be and as citizens we have given up, done nothing and watched its decline.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by MisterMarbles
Are you really telling me the billions of dollars that have been donated to charity has been wasted? Do you really think our society would be a better place if no one donated anything to the needy? I hope not. If so, I have nothing more to say to you.
In the context of this thread, we are talking about who pays for the basic necessities of life for those who can't afford it while living in the wealthiest country on the planet. Since the OP is clearly not even a multi-millionaire and has such a huge problem with a fraction of his taxes going towards feeding poor people, I proposed shifting the fiscal responsibility to people who should feel a lot less "taken" than the OP and his supporters.
In other words, unless you're a really greedy person with an 8 or 9+ figure net worth, my proposals don't hurt you, the OP or people like you at all. They would actually help you and people a lot poorer than you.
You are trying to solve the problem of too many people living off handouts by....them receiving more handouts. Not such a brilliant idea. A better idea is to reform education in a way that gives the lower classes of society more self-confidence, skill and knowledge to help themselves and not depend on handouts quite as much.
In your conversation with me you have blamed the rich as well as picked out George Bush and Ronald Reagan as people to blame. How is that kind of partisan blaming going to help the poor?
Have many decades of financial aid to africa helped africa become a 1st world country? No.That aid would have had to been invested in infrastructural growth and schools. If you hand every of the 47 Million people a 1000 dollars it does nothing for their self-confidence, skill, knowledge, empowerment.
Your proposals reflect the ideas of most people on this Forum and, unfortunately, most people in society. But they are a recipe for stagnation. When you give someone money they have to know how to make use of it in a way that it multiplies, otherwise you are only adding to their suffering. Its like giving them a jug of water without showing them the river.
Billionaires know this, thats why their charity donations are going more and more into infrastructural projects and to teachers and schools...to those institutions that can most help the poor.
Instead of accusing us (people who think like me) of being greedy, acknowledge that we are looking for better, more progressive ways of helping than handouts. Ways that will not demean a poor persons sense of dignity.
"Power to the people" can only come about when those people no longer have to spend all their energy on bare survival and have teachers, mentors and social workers that take the time and patience to extend a helping hand. It does not come about by throwing money at the problem. Money in and of itself is useless without the skill to make money for oneself.
Originally posted by MisterMarbles
The number of states is an irrelevant form of measure which you have cited repeatedly in this thread.
Originally posted by sealing
If your saying Obama did this, nope.
Originally posted by lee anoma
It's only been four years.
Originally posted by MisterMarbles
the Republican party has plenty of brilliant people with some really good, but very anti-Democratic ideas.
Originally posted by muse7
This is outrageous! How dare they give people free food!
This money could be going toward building MORE BOMBS!
Originally posted by Merinda
If low income earners try to fight for higher wages, they are evil communists. If they are on foot stamps, they are lazy slobs that cost me money. What the heck...
Originally posted by F4guy
Apparently the originator of this thread thinks the triple amputee vets who get a few hundred dollars a month as a disability pension should starve to death. Or maybe the single foster mother who takes in 9 abused children should let them starve.
Or maybe he's just some cowardly troll, who would neither fight for his country nor help its neglected children, while he sits in mommy's dark, dank basement reading Ayn Rand and hating anyone "not like him."
Originally posted by Starchildren
For people who are against those receiving food stamps:
Originally posted by th3dudeabides
Get rid of foodstamps and you have 47 million going hungry.