It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Harte
reply to post by Druscilla
Or, for another perspective -
Keep it up Druscilla!
GO Dru! GO Dru!
Glad to have you here, and happy to star you to death.
Harte
..strange unexplainable tides
Originally posted by HomerinNC
reply to post by Druscilla
Just to satisfy your curiosity, whether or not you choose to believe me or not, I really don't care, not sure if your thinly veiled insults are a result of your possible overwhelming loneliness, here is a pic of me & my better half
This weekend, my gf and I were watching a show about and they were talking about the return of Nibiru and the Annunaki, and she suggested it may exist in a parallel universe, and will 'phase' into this one at the end of December.
Originally posted by HomerinNC
This weekend, my gf and I were watching a show about and they were talking about the return of Nibiru and the Annunaki, and she suggested it may exist in a parallel universe, and will 'phase' into this one at the end of December.
I thought about it, and it sounds plausible if it were possible, the other thing she said it might be like a Dyson Sphere type structure or like the Death Star from Star Wars, and might be out there somewhere, light speeding its way here.
If Nibiru exists, and I will say for the record, its highly doubtful, but if it does, these maybe reasons why we wont see it til its here.
Thoughts, other then the typical one liners that say it doesnt exist??
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by HomerinNC
reply to post by boncho
I think he means she works so much she's not aware of topics discussed daily
The world ending in 2012 is a daily topic on this board, but the only time I have ever heard it come up in a social setting was when a nephew mentioned it after he had a couple too many drinks, and I told him to stop spending so much time online.
Like I said, it started and will end as an internet craze. It was used to peddle BS books, marketing dollars. Like many doomsday fads before it...
-
I guess the point I was trying to make was even if she wasn't working so much, there's no reason for her too have any more information about the supposed "end of the world".edit on 20-11-2012 by boncho because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Malynn
Really Harte? I thought you were one of the skeptics that could actually disagree with someone without being a jerk about it. I've read all Zecharia Sitchin's books and I've read all the supposed "Debunking" of his work, countless threads where Stereologist comes in and informs us we're all mouth-breathing ignorant douchebags and I haven't seen anything that proves conclusively Sitchin was wrong. If you'd like to offer a link which is your smoking gun for his wrongness by all means, pony it up.
Furthermore, Sitchin in no way predicted Nibiru would cross in 2012. He said it would be about a 1000 years from now. Do I believe he was correct about it all? I have no idea, but I immensely enjoyed reading his work and it was all definitely plausible and more so than the crap half this world whole-heartedly believes in.
Also, OP, completely disregard Druscilla. She, he, arm-pit lady, whatever they are is incapable of having a polite and rational discussion with anyone. Unless of course you're toeing the line of textbook science.
Enjoy your time with your girlfriend, and cherish those moments of outside the box theorizing. It's so much fun exploring the boundaries of our imaginations.edit on 11/20/12 by Malynn because: (no reason given)
The short answer is that everything Ancient Aliens says about the Annunaki comes from a man named Zecharia Sitchin. Sitchin wrote many books claiming that the Annunaki were really aliens. Unfortunately, at the time that he wrote this in the 70’s, there weren’t many ways for ordinary people to see if what he was saying is true or not.
To put it simply Sitchin’s translation of the word Annunaki is wrong.
Sitchin claimed to be an expert on Sumerian writings, yet we can now see that he didn’t seem to even understand the basic grammar and vocabulary rules of the Sumerian language. Several real scholars challenged him on his translations, and on his lack of any academic credentials in the field, pointing out that there is no record of Sitchin having anything but a journalism degree
One such scholar is Michael Heiser. “To this day I haven’t been able to find, nor have other people of whom I’ve asked help – people who liked Sitchin – any credentials of him knowing any of the languages or him being credentialed in any way in ancient near-eastern studies.”
Originally posted by Malynn
Really Harte? I thought you were one of the skeptics that could actually disagree with someone without being a jerk about it.
Originally posted by Malynn
I've read all Zecharia Sitchin's books and I've read all the supposed "Debunking" of his work, countless threads where Stereologist comes in and informs us we're all mouth-breathing ignorant douchebags and I haven't seen anything that proves conclusively Sitchin was wrong. If you'd like to offer a link which is your smoking gun for his wrongness by all means, pony it up.
Originally posted by Malynn
Also, OP, completely disregard Druscilla. She, he, arm-pit lady, whatever they are is incapable of having a polite and rational discussion with anyone. Unless of course you're toeing the line of textbook science.
Originally posted by Malynn
Enjoy your time with your girlfriend, and cherish those moments of outside the box theorizing. It's so much fun exploring the boundaries of our imaginations.
Originally posted by HomerinNC
I thought about it, and it sounds plausible if it were possible,