posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 03:15 PM
Originally posted by Malynn
reply to post by Harte
Again, I disagree with your absolute assertion that Sitchin was a "fraud" and a "hoax". However, you conveniently didn't respond to my statement
that it is in fact a rule here that COURTESY IS MANDATORY. Or did you not wish to include that in your point-by-point rebuttal?
Are you the arbiter of courtesy?
I see nothing discourteous in my post you responded to. If you expect me to worry about Druscilla's courtesy (or lack thereof,) you'll be waiting
quite some time.
If you feel I've been discourteous at any time, please feel free to report my post to any mod. Believe me, I'll do the same for you.
IMO, you dredged that up, along with your "belief" that I'm wrong, because you simply have no actual
response whatsoever to my statements
(the cold, hard facts) about your hero Sitchin. This is evident even in your claim that "other researchers" have recently been coming to "similar
conclusions..." What a line of total hooie that is! So you pull up some last line you included in a response to another poster and pretend I'm
supposed to respond to your cutting and pasting one of the T&C's of this site? What would prompt me to include it in any response to you? You
didn't say it to me and I've not been discourteous.
That's right, it's not discourteous to call a spade a spade and you can count on me to do so. You won't find me tip-toeing around with my posts in
some perverse attempt to preserve the "feelings" of people who choose
to remain ignorant.
That's not discourteous either.