It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stumason
I'd sure hate to be a postman in your neighbourhood.... Or someone lost and asking for directions. You Americans can be an extreme and unreasonable sort, sometimes.
Originally posted by stumason
However, in the civilised world, killing someone for merely having the audacity to "be on your property" is considered a somewhat extreme response and it is disturbing you would dispense with another humans life so flippantly without even PID'ing the target and asking what they want.
Originally posted by stumason
90%? Hardly.. If you're going to whinge about colonialism, I'd look closer to home. After all, as a white South African, your ancestors did precisely that which your now accusing us "Poms" of doing. And I have no idea what Haiti has to do with anything, it was a French colony.
Of nearly 200 countries worldwide, Britain had invaded 90 per cent of them, either by colonisation, war or an armed presence of some sort. Indeed, it was easier to sum up by listing the few nations we hadn't touched – mainly the likes of Chad, Tajikistan and other places that colonial powers either weren't bothered about having, or perhaps simply never realised were there.
blogs.t elegraph.co.uk
Link
The settlement of Yacanagua was burnt to the ground three times in its just over a century long existence as a Spanish settlement, first by French pirates in 1543, again on 27 May 1592 by a 110 strong landing party from a 4 ship English naval squadron led by Christopher Newport in his flagship Golden Dragon, who destroyed all 150 houses in the settlement
Amnesty International criticised what it described as a "deeply-disturbing trade-off" between trade and strategic interests and the promotion of rights and democratic reform. The Campaign Against the Arms Trade condemned what it called "a very clear UK message of support for these authoritarian regimes". Promoting arms sales meant concerns about human rights were "empty words," it added.
www.guardian.co.uk
Originally posted by stumason
reply to post by harryhaller
Perceived position? It was bloody clear! Anyone on your property uninvited dies, no equivocation allowed. If you make such a statement, expect to get called on it. I doubt I am alone in thinking such behaviour as "uncivilised", in fact, it is downright barbaric.
You clearly don't like being challenged nor having dissenting opinion (which is all any of us really has on here) pushed your way and expect me to shut up because I won't bite into your clear attempt at derailment. I have plenty to say on the matter of colonialism, however, this is not the correct thread for such a discussion.
Originally posted by zonetripper2065
Never thought I'd see people pretending they have never peed outside, your liars and hypocrites and from here on out should be disregarded as being full of it
Originally posted by harryhaller
The pig had no rights on that property, not without a warrant. That is civilisation.
Originally posted by harryhaller
Trespassing, assault, intimidation, those were his crimes.
Originally posted by harryhaller
The 3 year old peed. Outside.
Originally posted by stumason
crap
Actually, an officer (no matter the jurisdiction) does not require a warrant in certain circumstances, such as seeing an offence being committed, or if there is an immediate danger etc.
The fact, however, you refer to them as "pigs" displays a predisposed position against the Police on your part.
as it was on the front lawn.
Who, the Officer? How was it trespass, or assault, let alone intimidation?
the circumstances that would appear
I assume
there is a right to refuse such a fine and contest it in court along the lines of the Bill of Rights.
Originally posted by sdcigarpig
the actual law in the state of Oklahoma as follows:
A. Every person who willfully and knowingly either:
Originally posted by harryhaller
Originally posted by sdcigarpig
the actual law in the state of Oklahoma as follows:
A. Every person who willfully and knowingly either:
Excellent post, thanks
A 3 year old is not legally a person yet. A person is generally regarded as legal entity.
"lewdly exposes" ... yeah, kids are right creepy, waving their willies around