It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
As for fat azz and knowing the symptoms how come you didnt bother to stop the officer from taking that action? You, and the others in this thread, had no way of knowing this individual was hypoglycemic until the media reported it after the fact.
Originally posted by jcarpenter
Originally posted by InFriNiTee
There should be a law that all law enforcement learn about things like diabetes, epilepsy, etc.
Who needs another freakin' "law"?
What we need are cops with integrity and common sense. Apparently, these are rare characteristics today.
Originally posted by Auricom
reply to post by ColoradoJens
In my honest opinion, this is just another thread trying to make cops look like bad guys. Cops deal with drunks/druggies all day every day. And when you see someone past out, you kinda figure he/she is a drunkard/diabetic.
I also disagree with your statement that makes it sound like the cop called this person a "freak", and you know he didn't either. Which is just disgusting on your part. The rest of us with common sense realize he was using slang, "freakin".
However, I have to give two thumbs down to the cop for tazing someone who isn't responsive. That just seems really stupid to me. "Hey bud, you alive? Let's taze you and find out!".
Originally posted by Honor93
yes, i read them, before commenting.
point is, you seem to think that "he had no way of knowing" and i still claim BS of the highest order ... even my 8yr old grandchild can detect when something like that is wrong. (no medical training needed)
Originally posted by Honor93
X - it was an auto accident ... there may be injuries ... that's an absolute.
the officer, under no threat, should have WAITED (like the last trigger happy moron who shot the dad) until EMS responded, period.
Originally posted by Honor93
notice, i didn't say the officer should have known, i said he should have WAITED until the proper authority arrived.
he jumped the gun (literally in this case) and he was wrong.
Originally posted by Honor93
unresponsive IS a diagnosis, every time, try again.
even drunk and unresponsive is still a DIAGNOSIS, you know, that which you/they aren't qualified to make.
Originally posted by Honor93
so, are you saying an unresponsive dead person should be tased too ??
you know, you gave an order and he ignored you, so taze the dude and watch that body bounce !!
please man, tell us how it really is out there, eh ??
Originally posted by Honor93
protocol is not "situation dependent" and never has been.
protocol should be followed not re-written as you/they see fit.
Originally posted by Honor93
yes, i read the outcome, doesn't mean i agree with it.
and besides, it's not the city who pays ~~ it's the taxpayers, yet again, even though it should be the sole responsibility of the thug with a tazer fantasy, inability to follow protocol and unwillingness to be patient until the proper authority arrived.
Originally posted by Honor93
on the off chance you've never been involved in an auto accident, good luck getting the pd to respond in a reasonable amount of time.
often, they are the last to respond, not the first.
Originally posted by Honor93
attending to an injured person IS most assuredly out of their area of responsibility or they would be licensed to do such a thing, however, they are not.
Originally posted by Honor93
you're confused but this wouldn't be the first time.
do tell, when an auto accident is NOT reported to the PD, what authority do they have again ??
or perhaps, when an auto accident occurs on private property, why aren't they (cops) permitted to flaunt their authority ??
oh, that's right, because they have NONE.
Originally posted by Honor93
i'm beginning to think your perception of "authority" is merely a figment of your imagination.
Originally posted by Honor93
it does not take hindsight to witness or complicate an injury.
it does not take a totality of circumstance to determine a threat.
nice try but try again cause you are waaaay off the mark.
Originally posted by Honor93
you also cannot claim a bystander didn't/couldn't know cause you weren't there either, were you?
Originally posted by Honor93
surprisingly, i've seen and assisted with more diabetic complications in a week than most do in a lifetime and i'm not a medical authority either.
Originally posted by Honor93
i guess it takes a compassionate person to recognize the ailments of others.
tis a shame most cops don't possess such a skill.
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
But you have posed your argument so that the officer may have been in the right -
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
my contention is an unresponsive person involved in a car crash should not be tasered for not responding to commands unless threatening the officer. Your argument seems to somehow imply it is ok to tase an unresponsive individual.
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by Xcathdra
But you have posed your argument so that the officer may have been in the right - my contention is an unresponsive person involved in a car crash should not be tasered for not responding to commands unless threatening the officer. Your argument seems to somehow imply it is ok to tase an unresponsive individual.
CJedit on 27-10-2012 by ColoradoJens because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OneisOne
You keep comparing ketoacidosis to being drunk, probably because of the fruit smell on the breath, that does not work in this situation.
Vomiting, dehydration, deep gasping breathing, confusion and occasionally coma
DKA most frequently occurs in those who already have diabetes, but it may also be the first presentation in someone who had not previously been known to be diabetic. There is often a particular underlying problem that has led to the DKA episode; this may be intercurrent illness (pneumonia, influenza, gastroenteritis, a urinary tract infection), pregnancy, inadequate insulin administration (e.g. defective insulin pen device), myocardial infarction (heart attack), stroke or the use of coc aine. Young patients with recurrent episodes of DKA may have an underlying eating disorder, or may be using insufficient insulin for fear that it will cause weight gain.[5]
You still have the remaining symptoms.
Originally posted by OneisOne
The kid had low blood sugar which is the exact opposite of ketoacidosis. That means no chance of a fruity smell.
Originally posted by OneisOne
And ketoacidosis does not automatically equal a fruity smell. Trust me, I know that for a fact.
Originally posted by OneisOne
So drop talking about ketoacidosis. It has nothing to do with what happened.