More stuff on the moon.

page: 2
12
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 11:48 AM
link   
reply to post by Arken
 


Thanks.

I'm not sure what it is but I find it hard to believe it's a natural formation.





posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 12:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by ZetaRediculian

Originally posted by Hydrawolf
reply to post by ZetaRediculian
 


And I guess music makes it more plausible as well huh?

Watch the video in it's entirety like I am about to do and quit your whining.
I tried but can't. its over a minute long.


yet given your username you're smart enough to not fall for zeta-talk


why not state your critique properly: in plain english instead of in "semi-trollish"?
edit on 24-10-2012 by DerepentLEstranger because: fixed punctuation



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 12:17 PM
link   
reply to post by DerepentLEstranger
 




I try to ignore them but at times it's very difficult.

Oh well it's like the real world you can't avoid all of the, (*insert descriptive word here), so I just smile and nod.

* I would have filled the blank but I did that earlier to another member and a mod 'corrected' my mannerism.
Plus they took some of my ATS Points!
(bastards).



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 12:19 PM
link   
If you want to see for yourself, here is a link to the image in the video...

LROC Browser - M126091916L

Location is little blue square and pan to the left



It's an interesting shape, but judging by all the other rocks around, and the lack of other interesting shapes in the general vicinity, that it is a natural formation. For example, if there were two or three of these next to each other, that would be outstanding evidence.



It would likely be less interesting at a different sun angle.



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 12:25 PM
link   
The moon is full of hexagons. Mostly hexagonal craters.

files.abovetopsecret.com...

www.rc-astro.com...

Here's a Harvard abstract on a possible reason they would take hexagonal shape.
adsabs.harvard.edu...
edit on 24-10-2012 by The Cusp because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 12:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Zarniwoop
 


Really?

It looks so geometric. I don't think it's a natural formation. It could be something we left behind or something built by the "Moon People".


Oh well we all have opinions.



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 12:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger

why not state your critique properly: in plain english instead of in "semi-trollish"?
edit on 24-10-2012 by DerepentLEstranger because: fixed punctuation
Because I wouldn't have anything to contribute.



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 12:54 PM
link   
reply to post by cavalryscout
 




It looks so geometric.


I think it's a bit of lighting trickery and your mind is filling in the blanks.



It's not really that geometric, the right side is missing, and you can't see the part of it that is in the shadow, if there is anything.



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 01:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Zarniwoop
 


Hmmm....

Maybe the guy in the article was correct. The empty area on the right almost looks like an opening.(door?)

I know it isn't the point you were trying to make.



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 01:39 PM
link   
reply to post by cavalryscout
 


Also take into account that the Youtuber used graphics software to enhance the image for the close-up instead of just zooming in on it.




posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 02:18 PM
link   
reply to post by Zarniwoop
 


Well of course he did for obvious reasons. Wouldn't you try to get the best quality image?

If he didn't people would ask why he didn't enhance the image.

That's a little weak.



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 02:28 PM
link   
reply to post by cavalryscout
 


Interesting shape. I did not see much in the second set of photos, but this side link looked cool. Look how fast this UFO is moving in the video.

www.ufosightingsdaily.com...



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 02:40 PM
link   
reply to post by The Cusp
 


"The possibility of impacts of large meteorites on the thin crust of the early moon accounting for the formation of the hexagonal lunar craters is discussed. Solidified basalts comprising a lunar crust of thickness 10 to 50 km characteristic of the earliest stage in lunar evolution are shown to have a large-scale hexagonal pillar structure, due to the effects of shrinkage. Results of experimental simulations of the propagation in this hexagonal pillar structure of the shock wave generated by the impact of a meteorite of diameter 10 km and mass 10 to the 15th kg on the lunar crust are then presented which demonstrate the pushing away from a central circular shock of pillars resting on a low-friction surface in a hexagonal pattern."

NASA ~ NeverAStraightAnswer

If the above is true, show us film of the hex crater creation.

If these hex craters are not natural and NASA knows it, then it would be easier to make up mumbo jumbo like the above to explain them away than to have to airbrush hundreds of photos. After lying to us with the litter box photo of the Face I do not put anything past them.



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 02:42 PM
link   
reply to post by ZetaRediculian
 


"We lied about everything."
~ Bell Com / NASA insider



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 02:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Arken
reply to post by cavalryscout
 


Nice catch.
The anomaly in the video by streetcap1 is clearly something suspicious.

S&F.


So a almost hexagon shaped rock is suspicious you better take a look

at this then





or this




Or the many others all around the Earth!



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 02:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by spiritualarchitect
reply to post by cavalryscout
 


Interesting shape. I did not see much in the second set of photos, but this side link looked cool. Look how fast this UFO is moving in the video.

www.ufosightingsdaily.com...


That video was cool as hell! What more can you ask 4?

There's a drunk guy swinging on a gymnastics bar, which breaks
, near a cliff and a ufo flyby!!!

I'm just assuming the guy was drunk but wouldn't you have to be?

I want to see it in slo-mo.



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 02:48 PM
link   
reply to post by spiritualarchitect
 


Not saying I buy it. Just happy that they actually admit there are strange hexagons on the moon.

edit on 24-10-2012 by The Cusp because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 02:49 PM
link   
reply to post by cavalryscout
 



Well of course he did for obvious reasons. Wouldn't you try to get the best quality image?

If he didn't people would ask why he didn't enhance the image.

That's a little weak.


He didn't get the "best quality image". He modified the image to better support his theory.

It's also possible that he was using software that did the smoothing automatically when zooming and didn't realize what he was doing.

When you are analyzing images, you should work only with what is provided in the original image, not an algorithm that produces what the image might look like at a better resolution.



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 02:50 PM
link   
reply to post by wmd_2008
 


Okay but wind and water formed those shapes.

I don't thing there is wind or water on the moon.



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 02:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by cavalryscout
reply to post by wmd_2008
 


Okay but wind and water formed those shapes.

I don't thing there is wind or water on the moon.


Wrong it's volcanic!!!!
edit on 24-10-2012 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)





new topics
top topics
 
12
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join