posted on Oct, 19 2012 @ 09:11 AM
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
That was about as far as I needed to get to make my determination of his credibility. Hillary ought to remember the feeling in the White House when
her Husband bombed an Aspirin factory in The Sudan. I hope they don't fall for this again.
......by the way, wasn't there some similar Iraqi source spilling all the juicy bits on Saddam....which no one could ever actually FIND once we got in
there? Always "A Source" these days. Evidence before committing to a whole new war would be really really nice.
Great critical examination. But you don't go far enough.
Once the political direction has been laid, the "evidence" gets "sexed up" to fit the goal. Sound familiar yet?
Do you remember the emmy-caliber-drama performance of a pretty young girl that testified that Iraqi soldiers stole incubators and left the children to
die on the floor? That testimony was plastered across the network "news" by the mindless talking heads for days.
Do you remember the "live, on-location" news reports that were created in US studios?
Point being: It's SOP (standard operating procedure) to fabricate "evidence" in support of the goal of our scumbag, lying politicians.
Our propaganda machine is now at work on Iran. But hey, this is nothing new. Our propaganda machine victimized Iran in 1953. Look it up.
edit on 19-10-2012 by jcarpenter because: (no reason given)