It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Evolution Now Dead. 30 Papers Suggest DNA is Encoded Intelligently

page: 32
41
<< 29  30  31    33  34  35 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 10:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by HappyBunny
 





It's not made up! It dates from 1509 and comes from the Latin "gravitatem", which means "weight, heaviness, or pressure". The first scientific use dates from 1641 (before Newton was even born) and "gravitate" dates from 1692.
But someone at some point had to make up that term, see its all made up.


So what? Every word in the history of mankind has been made up at some point. It doesn't mean the facts are wrong.




posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 11:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by HappyBunny
 





It's not made up! It dates from 1509 and comes from the Latin "gravitatem", which means "weight, heaviness, or pressure". The first scientific use dates from 1641 (before Newton was even born) and "gravitate" dates from 1692.
But someone at some point had to make up that term, see its all made up.


Yeah, after presenting scientific facts to back it up...something you completely failed doing



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 02:20 PM
link   
reply to post by Barcs
 





So what? Every word in the history of mankind has been made up at some point. It doesn't mean the facts are wrong.
And likewise, just because I made up a term doesn't mean its false.



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 02:24 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





Yeah, after presenting scientific facts to back it up...something you completely failed doing
The facts have been shared multiple times, if your not paying attention thats your problem. You were quizzed multiple times to either put up or shut up. Never once did you present anything that explained why a species seems to know what his food is supposed to be, rather you claim that all species eat random food and stick to what they like, but you failed to explain how it is that they all like the same food as a species, and you also failed to explain why we never seem them experiementing with food. You fail frequently, but in target food you severly failed.



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 02:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by Barcs
 





So what? Every word in the history of mankind has been made up at some point. It doesn't mean the facts are wrong.
And likewise, just because I made up a term doesn't mean its false.


Sure it does, if it isn't backed up by OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE. You basically made up a word and then assigned int a random definition that DOESN'T MATCH REALITY



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 02:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





Yeah, after presenting scientific facts to back it up...something you completely failed doing
The facts have been shared multiple times, if your not paying attention thats your problem. You were quizzed multiple times to either put up or shut up. Never once did you present anything that explained why a species seems to know what his food is supposed to be, rather you claim that all species eat random food and stick to what they like, but you failed to explain how it is that they all like the same food as a species, and you also failed to explain why we never seem them experiementing with food. You fail frequently, but in target food you severly failed.



Still not getting the theory, huh?


And I can't fail in target food because it's MADE UP...just like you can't fail in "grillaripuramatura blurps"


Most species learn what to eat from their parents. Just like you learned it from your parents...and that's why you don't eat insects while it's very common in Asia. Also, not all species stick to one food source, a FACT that you've been told numerous times yet continue to ignore.

What's the point discussing evolution with you? Post after post you show off an incredible lack of education, and even worse, you aren't even willing to learn. You are the very definition of an ignoramus...and that's a FACT too



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 03:19 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





Sure it does, if it isn't backed up by OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE. You basically made up a word and then assigned int a random definition that DOESN'T MATCH REALITY
What you mean to say is that you don't want it to match reality even though it does, because then it wont fit your bat crazy religion.

Target food is identified, and proven, so are the 3 phases of hunger.



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 03:24 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





Most species learn what to eat from their parents.
And you lie again, if this were true, our definitions on diet would indicate this to be the case, but it's actually quite rare.




Just like you learned it from your parents
Of course we learned it from our parents, we don't have any target food here, this has allready been established.




...and that's why you don't eat insects while it's very common in Asia. Also, not all species stick to one food source, a FACT that you've been told numerous times yet continue to ignore.
But all species would if the correct food was available, but it usually isn't.




What's the point discussing evolution with you? Post after post you show off an incredible lack of education, and even worse, you aren't even willing to learn. You are the very definition of an ignoramus...and that's a FACT too
Hey your the one that thought Target food was a precursor to evolution, epic fail. Just goes to show you how ignorant someone can be.



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 03:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





Sure it does, if it isn't backed up by OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE. You basically made up a word and then assigned int a random definition that DOESN'T MATCH REALITY
What you mean to say is that you don't want it to match reality even though it does, because then it wont fit your bat crazy religion.



No, what I'm I'm saying is that your made up word isn't real because you entire premise doesn't match reality.



Target food is identified, and proven


Only in your fantasy world tooth



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 03:35 PM
link   
reply to post by itsthetooth
 








and often, if it moves and has the right size, it's food...



Don't believe me? Walk through Serengeti without a gun....



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 03:45 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





No, what I'm I'm saying is that your made up word isn't real because you entire premise doesn't match reality
Then you should have no problem disproving it, which you still fail to do.




Only in your fantasy world tooth
Abalone does only eat one food and it is his target food. So it looks like your wrong again.



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 03:50 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





Don't believe me? Walk through Serengeti without a gun....
If they are NOT eating their target food, there is a much higher chance they will have to be trained on what to eat, and target food would just be found through instinct.

So what about all the rest of the species that don't teach their young how to eat? How does that work? Magic?


The other thing your failing to realize is that our understanding of them being taught how to eat is a simple observation but donesn't prove it to be conclusive. There would have to be proof by means of not subjecting them to the training to see where they go from there. If they end up eating the same food, then your wrong. It's a little to east to just accept that as fact, but your the evolutionist.



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 04:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





Don't believe me? Walk through Serengeti without a gun....
If they are NOT eating their target food, there is a much higher chance they will have to be trained on what to eat, and target food would just be found through instinct.

So what about all the rest of the species that don't teach their young how to eat? How does that work? Magic?


The other thing your failing to realize is that our understanding of them being taught how to eat is a simple observation but donesn't prove it to be conclusive. There would have to be proof by means of not subjecting them to the training to see where they go from there. If they end up eating the same food, then your wrong. It's a little to east to just accept that as fact, but your the evolutionist.


You do realize that's exactly what we do with animals in captivity...right? There are tigers in Thailand and they are VEGETARIAN...because they never learn to hunt. So once again, you are talking out of your ass...

And of course those observation prove it because soooooooo many species do it, and it always results in the same outcome...offspring learning to eat. Some animals don't learn from their parents, like sharks for example. But again, they don't need to because if it gets close enough and if it's the right size it's food...

When a lion in the Serengeti rips you apart before eating your brain, he doesn't think to itself "damnit, humans are not on my target food list".


They will kill and eat you if they're hungry, just like I kill and eat a fish when I'm out camping...because guess what, it's food. I could also go for eggs...which tons of animals do too.


And here's the kicker:

If I was really hungry and had not the slightest clue what to eat out in the wild, I would try stuff. If I found a snake, so be it...dead snake, less hungry MrXYZ.

And before you say "of course, that's because we're special"...

A ton of species can survive even in environments they weren't used to before...some specialised on the other hand can't because their integration into a specific environment is just too extreme...so they would never handle anything else.

Drop a tiger into the Serengeti (fy, there are none)...well, he might have never seen that giant wild pig before in its life, but guess what, that pig will die and be eaten by the tiger. And the tiger doesn't give a rat's ass about your god damn "target food" list. Just like I don't care when you drop me into the desert and I have to kill a snake I never saw before.

And spare us with your "but that's out of desperation, see, we don't come from here" nonsense! Living beings need an energy source, that energy source can be called food. And every single life form will do what it can to get that energy. Some only need light and water, others require baby antilopes, some prefer pigs, others tuna...take your pick. But we need to eat because of anatomy, it's how we evolved...in line with our environment.

It's still ongoing too...that's why you have humans who climb Everest carrying rich people's luggage without any oxygen supply while the rich guys enjoy their oxygen bottles carrying pretty much nothing. And that's why there are now microbes who eat nylon, a material that never existed before we invented it.

So tooth, PLEASE stop your nonsense, stop trying to dumb down this forum. I'm not even gonna ask you to do research. All I ask is that you switch of your computer and sit down for an hour. Think about whether you're objective here. Because you're NOT! Just like every religious fanatic you start with a conclusion (aka "aliens did it all") and then try to find evidence. And when that evidence doesn't show up, you resort to INVENTING WORDS and assigning them random definitions that simply aren't based on reality. Your understanding of how thing's like this work has "gaps". And you're not willing to admit that...
edit on 15-11-2012 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 04:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





No, what I'm I'm saying is that your made up word isn't real because you entire premise doesn't match reality
Then you should have no problem disproving it, which you still fail to do.




Only in your fantasy world tooth
Abalone does only eat one food and it is his target food. So it looks like your wrong again.



Just fyi, Abalone has more than one food source...so as seemingly always, you are wrong



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 04:45 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 
He has also been told that there is more than one species of abalone Abalone Wiki

The family Haliotidae contains only one genus, Haliotis. That genus contains about four to seven subgenera. The number of species recognized worldwide ranges between 30[5] and 130[6] with over 200 species-level taxa described. The most comprehensive treatment of the family considers 56 species valid, with 18 additional subspecies.[7]
He cannot explain why there is diversity here either.

This is the same guy that claims lions are not meant to hunt or to eat meat.

He is without a doubt the only person that believes the rubbish he spouts and is probably does have a target food himself.

A diet of nuts and fruit cake. You are what you eat



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 05:35 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





Just fyi, Abalone has more than one food source...so as seemingly always, you are wrong
Seaweed, kelp, or alge, which are all basically the same thing. is it. Thats all.
edit on 15-11-2012 by itsthetooth because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 05:38 PM
link   
reply to post by colin42
 


Thats rich coming from a person that has to use lies and deception to try to win an argument.



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 05:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





Just fyi, Abalone has more than one food source...so as seemingly always, you are wrong
Seaweed is it. Thats all.


Nope...microalgue too. Babies eat plankton.

LINK

The amount of random statements you make without spending at least a few seconds researching is astounding.

I mean, all it would have taken is googling "abalone eat what". All search results on the first page lead to links that show how wrong you are. And no, kelp and seaweed isn't "practically the same", and neither are micro algue. The are different species. You won't ever see kelp mate with micro algue...just like you won't ever see a crocodile mate with an aligator, or a human with a cat.

Again, you don't want to be proven wrong because you are so brainwashed you blindly believe your mini-religion. So it's not because you're lazy, you simply shut your eyes and ears from reality and live in a fantasy world.
edit on 15-11-2012 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 05:41 PM
link   
reply to post by colin42
 





He cannot explain why there is diversity here either.

This is the same guy that claims lions are not meant to hunt or to eat meat.

He is without a doubt the only person that believes the rubbish he spouts and is probably does have a target food himself.

A diet of nuts and fruit cake. You are what you eat
There is diversity becuse they are exposed to different enviroments, which is not to say that one day they could evolve into a different species.



posted on Nov, 15 2012 @ 05:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by colin42
 





He cannot explain why there is diversity here either.

This is the same guy that claims lions are not meant to hunt or to eat meat.

He is without a doubt the only person that believes the rubbish he spouts and is probably does have a target food himself.

A diet of nuts and fruit cake. You are what you eat
There is diversity becuse they are exposed to different enviroments, which is not to say that one day they could evolve into a different species.


And since the environment constantly changes (previous seas are now deserts) and according to your crazy belief evolution doesn't happen...well...I guess everyone's going to die out


PLEASE stop that ignorance and open a biology book.

edit on 15-11-2012 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
41
<< 29  30  31    33  34  35 >>

log in

join