It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Evolution Now Dead. 30 Papers Suggest DNA is Encoded Intelligently

page: 29
41
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 11 2012 @ 01:34 PM
link   
reply to post by itsthetooth
 


There is proof and objective evidence to back it up...the problem is, every time someone posts a link to it you go "lalaalalala, I can't seeeeeee it" just to then ask for proof a few posts later. I'm really not sure how else to say this tooth, but you are the very definition of ignorance. If ATS had a villain mascot called "Ignorantium", that would be you




posted on Nov, 11 2012 @ 03:25 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 


Well if someone would post some actual proof that could stand up in science maybe I wouldn't go La, la, la, la,la.

What do you expect me to do when you try to spoon feed me unproven thoeries?



posted on Nov, 11 2012 @ 03:55 PM
link   
reply to post by itsthetooth
 


You wouldn't recognise evidence if it hit you int he face tooth


To pretend you haven't been presented with evidence is not only dishonest, it's also incredibly laughable



posted on Nov, 11 2012 @ 03:56 PM
link   
reply to post by itsthetooth
 


You've been shown enough evidence for the theory of evolution to have it executed many times with extreme prejudice.

You're about as dishonest as any creationist wackjob on these boards.



posted on Nov, 11 2012 @ 05:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Prezbo369
 


If evolution was accepted as a scientific theory, all of religion as we know it would be at the wasteside, but that hasent happened. All schools would have mandatory teachings of evolution, but we don't. Evolution would be identifiable, but its not, we are never able to look at an organism and determine if it has actually evolved. Evolution would be predictable, but its not, we can't test the theory in labs, and if we could it would be identifiable but its not. Evolution would be recreatable but its not, we are unable to recreate anything that is unidentifiable.

Evolution is not falsifiable, you can't guarantee that there will be changes at anytime. Evolution is not predictable, there is no predictive value in the theory.

These changes that are taking place are nothing more than outside events affecting the organism, just like ADHD does to the CNV's as listed in this article...
ADHD linked to missing genes

Evolution has no evidence.
Evolution has no proof.
Evolution has no theory.

The preponderance of doubt is placed on the claimant, and so far, nothing has been convincing. There are many things you can connect dots with but connecting dots do not create a scientific theory.

There is limited, controlled proof of specieation and its only been found in some aquatic life and some bacteria and some viruses. This does NOT instantly mean that man shares a common ancestor with apes. There is no proof of any species slowly evolvinig into another species, be that in fossils, current life, or lab results. There is no proof that microevolution proves macroevolution. While most people make this assumption its never been proven and there is no proof in fossils and current life or lab tests. Changes do occur but we always end up with the same species.

Now if you want to test this against a real theory, look at my findings on the Target food. The idea is that all species are suppose to have pre determined food. So far the theory suggests that each species is suppose to have anywhere from only one to three different foods to eat, and when signs are obvious of it being different, its proof of the species entering a hunger phase. This is testable, recreatable, and most importantly its identifiable.

In rare situations, target food is identified but in most situations a species is eating almost everyting within a food group which is a sign of phase one hunger. When that is no longer available, a species will pick up another food group that it would not normally eat, this is phase two of hunger. If a species loses that as well, then its off to phase three which is starvation usually eating rocks and dirt and poo.



posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 12:20 AM
link   
tooth,

The comment above betrays just how ignorant you are and just how far out of your depth you are. You are intentionally misunderstanding what the Theory of Evolution is saying.

I strongly suggest that you stop trying to impress people with your silly ideas, go to a library and pick up a biology textbook. It's the only way you are going to learn anything. You are only making yourself look foolish.

No-one here or anywhere else is going to be impressed with your half-baked nonsense. People are just going to assume that you are a crackpot and not without reason it's all in your writing. The only value your target food "theory" has is its comedy value.

Adapt or die



posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 01:33 AM
link   
reply to post by itsthetooth
 


tooth, it's pretty clear that by now you resort to blatant lying to support your bat# crazy mini-religion. The comments you made above have all been debunked multiple times...yet you simply keep on repeating them like a broken tape recorder.

To pretend evolution isn't recreatable is LAUGHABLE given we use it in modern medicine to accurately predict future outcomes.

Stop trying to dumb down ATS readers and either start educating yourself or simply shut up with your clueless nonsense.

By the way, you saying "there is no proof" doesn't make that proof go away, no matter you wish for it...we don't live in a magical Peter Pan world where you get to clap your hand and all your bat# crazy dreams come true. Evolution is both a scientific theory and a FACT, no matter how much that goes against your irrational beliefs


Either way, you lost all credibility once you tried to argue against a scientific theory by using a MADE UP WORD

edit on 12-11-2012 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 11:47 AM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





tooth, it's pretty clear that by now you resort to blatant lying to support your bat# crazy mini-religion. The comments you made above have all been debunked multiple times...yet you simply keep on repeating them like a broken tape recorder.

To pretend evolution isn't recreatable is LAUGHABLE given we use it in modern medicine to accurately predict future outcomes
True but no one has recreated our common ancestor.




Stop trying to dumb down ATS readers and either start educating yourself or simply shut up with your clueless nonsense.

By the way, you saying "there is no proof" doesn't make that proof go away, no matter you wish for it...we don't live in a magical Peter Pan world where you get to clap your hand and all your bat# crazy dreams come true. Evolution is both a scientific theory and a FACT, no matter how much that goes against your irrational beliefs

Either way, you lost all credibility once you tried to argue against a scientific theory by using a MADE UP WORD
Hey target food is an observed even, and I'm still waiting for ANYONE including yourself, to debunk it.



posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 11:52 AM
link   
reply to post by itsthetooth
 





In rare situations, target food is identified but in most situations a species is eating almost everyting within a food group which is a sign of phase one hunger. When that is no longer available, a species will pick up another food group that it would not normally eat, this is phase two of hunger. If a species loses that as well, then its off to phase three which is starvation usually eating rocks and dirt and poo.


So when we look at nature and what we see disagrees with your delusions.... it means somethings wrong with nature which confirms your delusions...

The term bubble boy comes to mind.



posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 11:55 AM
link   
reply to post by itsthetooth
 


Target food isn't observed because it doesn't exist, you made it up!!!

And we have proof of multiple ancestors, it's just that with seemingly all FACTS, you simply ignore it because it doesn't fit your crazy religion.



posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 11:55 AM
link   
Double post...but posting it twice might have a higher chance at it finally sinking in

edit on 12-11-2012 by MrXYZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 04:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Wertdagf
 





So when we look at nature and what we see disagrees with your delusions.... it means somethings wrong with nature which confirms your delusions...

The term bubble boy comes to mind.
Aside from some evolutionists claiming that it's wrong, no one has presented anything that has proven it to be wrong. It's observed, and well documented all throughout diets of every species.



posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 04:54 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





Target food isn't observed because it doesn't exist, you made it up!!!

And we have proof of multiple ancestors, it's just that with seemingly all FACTS, you simply ignore it because it doesn't fit your crazy religion
The observations have been shared and proven to you to be fact, you can't argue with whats been observed.



posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 04:56 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





Double post...but posting it twice might have a higher chance at it finally sinking in
Stick to the joke telling, it seems to be the only thing you have on your side
.



posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 05:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





Target food isn't observed because it doesn't exist, you made it up!!!

And we have proof of multiple ancestors, it's just that with seemingly all FACTS, you simply ignore it because it doesn't fit your crazy religion
The observations have been shared and proven to you to be fact, you can't argue with whats been observed.


FYI, just because you keep on repeating a MADE UP WORD often enough doesn't make it real


I don't even think you know what "fact" means



posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 05:14 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





FYI, just because you keep on repeating a MADE UP WORD often enough doesn't make it real

I don't even think you know what "fact" means
Gravity is a made up word, evolution is a a made up word, Target food is observed which says a heck of a lot more than evolution does.



posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 05:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





FYI, just because you keep on repeating a MADE UP WORD often enough doesn't make it real

I don't even think you know what "fact" means
Gravity is a made up word, evolution is a a made up word, Target food is observed which says a heck of a lot more than evolution does.


No, gravity is a fully backed up theory that was given a name. A theory that is backed up by OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE and DETAILED MEASURED CALCULATIONS. Your "target food" on the other hand is a random word you made up, then assigned a random definition to it, never bothered to post any evidence to support your definition and claims, and then pretended it's somehow real and a prerequisite for evolution.

And no, you can't observe a MADE UP WORD


Other than as a post on ATS that is



posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 05:24 PM
link   
Tooth, which point do you disagree with, what evidence do you have on the contrary?


edit on 12-11-2012 by rhinoceros because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 05:34 PM
link   
reply to post by rhinoceros
 


Great list...and interesting discussion if you were discussing with a RATIONAL and LOGICAL person. Sadly that's not the case when it comes to tooth, so I fear his answer will consist of made up words and claiming "magic" stands in the way of the theory



posted on Nov, 12 2012 @ 06:40 PM
link   
reply to post by MrXYZ
 





No, gravity is a fully backed up theory that was given a name. A theory that is backed up by OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE and DETAILED MEASURED CALCULATIONS. Your "target food" on the other hand is a random word you made up, then assigned a random definition to it, never bothered to post any evidence to support your definition and claims, and then pretended it's somehow real and a prerequisite for evolution.

And no, you can't observe a MADE UP WORD

Other than as a post on ATS that is
Gravity started out as a random word, do you actually think they invented the name before the discovery? Target food is full of objective evidence, perhaps the best is how the squirrel is in phase 2 of hunger and its even explained in the wiki that they go into hunger durring this point. There is so much objective evidence that it's an observed fact.

Of course the term is made up, you have to give the process a name, there is no other way to identify it. Now evolution got its name prior to any facts. There are still large holes in the theory of evolution. There are no holes in the theory of target food, its solid as a rock.



new topics

top topics



 
41
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join