Look I could be way off base here. But lets try to look at this from one vantage point. I mean, take it with a grain of salt if you want but....
here it goes....(your in for the thrill ride of your life! ;-)
Lets say you have a criminal, some mafia group, who are well renowned for there lies, cheating, deception etc etc. So lets say you hand over to them a
project that would normally cost billions. But they do some research and figures out that infact he could do the project for just hundreds of
thousands, fake it, and then they could pocket the difference.
to make matters worse the project is just the kind that could be easily faked and no one would ever know any different. Also it's the kind of project
that if faked no one would really get all that hurt by the trickery. You think the mafia group isn't going to do this. People with a long criminal
history isn't going to pocket the money and give you a fake that likely you won't be able to tell any different if it's real or not?
Because think about it, this is your hard earned tax payer money. It's real money that people pay to TPTB. After it's paid to TPTB, billions are
appropriated to NASA. They then come up with these harebrained missions and report that it's going to cost billions of dollars. So essentially those
billions disappear, and in the end they have to produce some evidence that they did the mission; of which we get a movie.
Anyone with access to a junk yard, and some hollywood prop professionals could build a rover like that for maybe 10,000. The filming is so grainy that
anyone could do that film and pictures with a regular video camera you buy from walmart.
You can make even a good movie for cheap!!!! Which looks quite real...
.................Paranormal Activity - filmed for 16,000.00 dollars (sixteen thousands)
.................Open Water - filmed for 75,000.00 (seventy five thousand)
.................The Blair Witch Project - ESTIMATED BUDGET: $22,000
.................The Texas Chainsaw Massacre - $83,000
Look, the point is you got people that used false flags (lies, staged events) to get into every war since the 1800's running things, so it's a
documented fact that they'll lie, cheat, steal and even kill and do anything they want. But yet people are so dumb that they actually think they'll
get a "real mars landing" for that 2.5 billion they claim to have spent on that rover mission. I find that hard to believe.
Do have any idea what George Lucas could do with that kind of money. He made Starwars in todays money for 45million.
I come from a business background, that why I just think..... wow this is so nuts, you got people who's job it is to lie to the public all day long,
now telling them that they spent 2.5 billion of your money (taxpayer money) on this rover mission, which anyone amateur film maker could do in a
desert for maybe 25,000.00 and they could then pocket the rest.
I'm pretty sure I can explain why they do Rover missions to mars now instead of moon landings....
It's like this... First they claim they already went to the moon so they don't need to go back. Not only that but after people started to debunk the
moon landing they realized there's way too many things that could go wrong with the whole production.
So they took people out of the equation to reduce the amount of things that could be debunked. Then they choose mars to make it sound new and cool,
and unexplored. But it being so far away they claim they can only send a rover. Then all we get are some grainy imagines of a desert which are now
much harder to debunk for the billions of dollars. So it costs far less to produce the movie, far less could be debunked. Like it all makes business
Ahhhhh people, wake up already. the moon landing was no different. You paid 100 billion dollars to watch a 12 part series, basically about the same as
watching 1 season of survivor, for 100 billion dollars. Where did that money really go? Like seriously. You get a grainy video of a guy bouncing
around that a million youtube'rs have proven could be recreated for peanuts.
Like geeper creepers even I could produce a Rover landing if I put my mind to it. all I need is access to: a desert, a cheap walmart home movie
camera, and a junkyard to build rover and I could reproduce this!!!! Infact I think I'm gonna do this and put it on youtube for kicks! ha ha
Statements made here seem rather odd... hmmmm
Magic wires....same as used in magic shows....
This you have to see....considering these guys did a NEAR REPRODUCTION for LIKELY "under 5000 dollars" is ASTONISHING! With a big budget of say 5
million what could you do? Now just think, the apollo mission had 100 billion they used up.....(100 BILLION WITH A "b") But yet someone does a near
reproduction for perhaps 5 thousand. Think about it.....Did you really get 100 billion worth of moon landing or did you get a cheap Stanley Kubrick
studio version that could have been done for a few million???? hmmm
It's so obvious this was filmed in a studio. Another reason that comes to mind is why can't they ever, not one time point the camera up into space, or
do a 360 with the camera, or anything else. It's always stills in one small area, or them moon walking in on small area. Or driving the lander in one
small area. Because they can't point the camera around as the rest of the studio would show up.
Missions that do look plausible are ones where they orbit earth, space station, and satellite local and those sent out into far reaches. I think those
are probably real. The reason for some of this is the weaponization of space. That's something they'd spend money on. As well as communications,
satellites and things that can track, control and make them money. Then the far reaches stuff that shouldn't be too hard to do nor too expensive.
But the moon landing seems fake. As well as these mars rovers. At least they could have easily been faked, which raises the question why they never
went back to the moon. Why other countries have never gone. Why they haven't shown other countries how to go. Why there's no plans to go back.
And the rovers to me seem way way way too easy to fake. Like they claim the recent mission cost 2.5billion. And what do we get? We get what looks like
a production that could be done for easily under 1 million.
Anyway food for thought. Also I'm not saying I know for a fact either. I'm saying the evidence suggests, and if you follow the money we're talking
billions of tax payer money, basically which could have been stolen.
edit on 30-9-2012 by r2d246 because: (no reason
edit on 30-9-2012 by r2d246 because: (no reason given)
edit on 30-9-2012 by r2d246 because: (no reason