Hasselblads On The Moon

page: 4
5
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 01:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Did anyone examine they OTHER items that had regolith dust -- the items that DID come back from the moon with regolith dust on them?

If so, what did they discover about that dust that was on the items that NASA says came from the moon?



We might also ask why NASA sent a armed thugs to collect a tiny piece of tape which allegedly had "moon dust" on it. Remember the story of Granny's moon dust? Was this actually "moon dust" or could this have been NASA's simulated regolith??
www.abovetopsecret.com...

And why would NASA strong arm Ed Mitchell to keep that 16-mm DAC from going to auction?? Could the DAC have microscopic evidence of NASA's simulated regolith??
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Here is another classic example of NASA's obsession with finding the "missing moon rocks" from the BBC "What has happened to Nasa's missing Moon rocks?" These "gift rocks" be broken out of the lucite and they could be further example of NASA's simulated lunar regolith!
www.bbc.co.uk...

NASA's pattern of behavior is obvious : they are covering up for Nixon's Apollo.




posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 04:34 PM
link   
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 



We might also ask why NASA sent a armed thugs to collect a tiny piece of tape which allegedly had "moon dust" on it. Remember the story of Granny's moon dust? Was this actually "moon dust" or could this have been NASA's simulated regolith??
www.abovetopsecret.com...


The lunar samples belong to the American taxpayers. It is the government's duty to prevent thieves from profiting frothem illicitly.


And why would NASA strong arm Ed Mitchell to keep that 16-mm DAC from going to auction?? Could the DAC have microscopic evidence of NASA's simulated regolith??
www.abovetopsecret.com...


There is a huge market for "flown"memorabilia, and a potentially lucrative black market. NASA is trying to control the provenance of all of it's flown equipment to prevent forgeries.


Here is another classic example of NASA's obsession with finding the "missing moon rocks" from the BBC "What has happened to Nasa's missing Moon rocks?" These "gift rocks" be broken out of the lucite and they could be further example of NASA's simulated lunar regolith!
www.bbc.co.uk...


Why break them out of the lucite? You can freaking request any sample you want and test it yourself.


NASA's pattern of behavior is obvious : they are covering up for Nixon's Apollo.


Your pattern of behavior is even more obvious. You can't think of any real reason why the cameras left on the Moon are actually important, so you're changing the topic. What's next? The petrified wood gambit?



posted on Oct, 9 2012 @ 10:31 PM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 


You dance better than MC HAMMER, dude. Excuses, excuses.....

Let me pose another hypothesis to you: Let us imagine back to July 1969.

Let us imagine that the Russians beat America to land men on the "moon". The Russians eventually landed 6 ships successfully on the moon over 3 1/2 years. The Russians dumped the Hasselblad cameras on the moon. The Russians kept all their negatives locked in a top secret vault for 40+ years which is not available to scientific scrutiny. The Russians now show you pictures of Alexi Leonov on the "moon" in July of 1969.

Now ask yourself the simple question based upon the hypothetical I have posed : Do the Russian pictures, alone, offer convincing evidence that the Russians landed on the moon?



posted on Oct, 9 2012 @ 11:06 PM
link   
NASA is at this very moment removing (by digital manipulation) the reseau marks from the Apollo Hasselblad images.



Removing the reseau marks from digital scans of the original negatives is a very suspicious activity.

Naturally, it will be very time consuming.
Obviously, when taking out the reseau marks, which are the black crosses we see on the images, the artist will have to fill in the places where the reseau marks should be.

That means NASA is manipulating Apollo Hasselblad images with digital technology. And it also means they have something to hide.



posted on Oct, 10 2012 @ 03:33 AM
link   
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 



You dance better than MC HAMMER, dude. Excuses, excuses.....

Let me pose another hypothesis to you: Let us imagine back to July 1969.

Let us imagine that the Russians beat America to land men on the "moon". The Russians eventually landed 6 ships successfully on the moon over 3 1/2 years. The Russians dumped the Hasselblad cameras on the moon. The Russians kept all their negatives locked in a top secret vault for 40+ years which is not available to scientific scrutiny. The Russians now show you pictures of Alexi Leonov on the "moon" in July of 1969.

Now ask yourself the simple question based upon the hypothetical I have posed : Do the Russian pictures, alone, offer convincing evidence that the Russians landed on the moon?


No, the transmissions monitored by Goldstone would be enough. Nixon would be whipped into a frenzy and give NASA carte blanche in order to beat the Soviet Union to Mars. What do the cameras have to do with anything?



posted on Oct, 10 2012 @ 03:38 AM
link   
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 



Removing the reseau marks from digital scans of the original negatives is a very suspicious activity.


Why?


Naturally, it will be very time consuming.


No. Nowadays they have these things called "computers"that can do it instantly. All the reseau marks are on exactly the same place on all the photos.


Obviously, when taking out the reseau marks, which are the black crosses we see on the images, the artist will have to fill in the places where the reseau marks should be.


No, there's an algorithm for that.


That means NASA is manipulating Apollo Hasselblad images with digital technology. And it also means they have something to hide.


The reseau marks have been airbrushed out of many of the photos for decades. Now, please answer this simple question: what do you believe NASA is trying to hide by removing the black crosses from the digital scans of the photographs? The original negatives remain unaltered, you know.



posted on Oct, 11 2012 @ 01:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 



Removing the reseau marks from digital scans of the original negatives is a very suspicious activity.


Why?


We should be suspicious of any government entity that is vitally engaged in a pattern of behavior which seeks to cover up the historical record while simultaneously reissuing it as pure propaganda.
edit on 10/11/2012 by SayonaraJupiter because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2012 @ 02:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
NASA is at this very moment removing (by digital manipulation) the reseau marks from the Apollo Hasselblad images.



Digital scans of Apollo flight film images (Metric, Panoramic, ALSCC, 70mm Hasselblad, 35mm Nikon and Stellar) in their raw (unprocessed) form are in the public domain and as such are covered by NASA usage policy for still image and computer files (see URL: www.nasa.gov...). Raw scans should be credited using the line "NASA/JSC/Arizona State University" or "NASA/JSC/ASU". Arizona State University retains the rights to any derived products (such as post-scanning processed digital images and movies), in part and in whole. ASU hereby grants permission for news media, educators, personal, and scientific users to download and use individual ASU-produced Apollo images and their complete associated captions if applicable for personal, educational, and research uses without express permission. The following credit line is required: "NASA/JSC/Arizona State University." If space constraints do not permit a credit line of this length, then "NASA/JSC/ASU" is acceptable.


Source

I bolded the important part.

Elaboration: Ignoring the fact that documenting photo edits isn't propaganda, and all the rest ... what part of the historical record is being removed from your life with the removal of crosses from the image? Or even from changing the visible range?

Other than you believe all photo editing is evil I don't understand the point. Besides that, this is a project run by Arizona University primarily by the looks of things with assistance from the space centre.
edit on 11-10-2012 by Pinke because: Elaboration



posted on Oct, 11 2012 @ 03:20 AM
link   
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 



We should be suspicious of any government entity that is vitally engaged in a pattern of behavior which seeks to cover up the historical record while simultaneously reissuing it as pure propaganda.


We should be even more suspicious of any individual who repeats the same emotionally charged catch phrases over and over again while refusing to answer simple questions.



posted on Oct, 11 2012 @ 07:00 AM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 




We should be even more suspicious of any individual who repeats the same emotionally charged catch phrases over and over again while refusing to answer simple questions.

That's how the Nazis did it.



posted on Oct, 11 2012 @ 08:22 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 11 2012 @ 11:12 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 02:14 AM
link   
ATTENTION ALL

Let's not make this personal. Focus on the topic and not on each other.

Thank you.



posted on Oct, 14 2012 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by lokomotiv23
 


If they really went to the moon, they would have brought the Apollo 11 Hasselblad back if not some of the others. Apollo is fake.



posted on Oct, 14 2012 @ 07:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by CatherineD
reply to post by lokomotiv23
 


If they really went to the moon, they would have brought the Apollo 11 Hasselblad back if not some of the others. Apollo is fake.

Can you explain how the Hasselblads would be evidence that they went (I mean more so than the other things that DID come back from the Moon, such as the Hasselblad Camera film magazines)?



posted on Oct, 15 2012 @ 04:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by CatherineD
If they really went to the moon, they would have brought the Apollo 11 Hasselblad back if not some of the others. Apollo is fake.

Yes, it makes no sense that they were on the moon fifty years ago.



posted on Oct, 15 2012 @ 11:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ove38

Originally posted by CatherineD
If they really went to the moon, they would have brought the Apollo 11 Hasselblad back if not some of the others. Apollo is fake.

Yes, it makes no sense that they were on the moon fifty years ago.


Take your hammer and chisel to the pillar of every Apollo lunar Hasselblad image .... it is pure propaganda ....
and it crumbles easily without very much effort.



posted on Oct, 16 2012 @ 04:05 AM
link   
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 



Take your hammer and chisel to the pillar of every Apollo lunar Hasselblad image .... it is pure propaganda ....
and it crumbles easily without very much effort.


Have you ever found a single "anomaly" that was not easily explained? Example, please.



posted on Oct, 16 2012 @ 04:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
 



We should be suspicious of any government entity that is vitally engaged in a pattern of behavior which seeks to cover up the historical record while simultaneously reissuing it as pure propaganda.


We should be even more suspicious of any individual who repeats the same emotionally charged catch phrases over and over again while refusing to answer simple questions.


NOW..

there's the kettle calling the pot black~!!

and YES we should LOL



posted on Oct, 16 2012 @ 05:02 AM
link   
reply to post by Komodo
 



NOW..

there's the kettle calling the pot black~!!


Are you implying that I keep repeating the same emotionally charged phrases? Could you provide an example? Or are you implying that I refuse to answer questions? Again, please provide an example.





new topics
top topics
 
5
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join