Originally posted by Dizrael
Originally posted by CaptainBeno
Hmmm.......I feel someone might go "swimming with the fishes" soon then?................watch this space?
definately going to need to watch this closely. if he dies abruptly, well know what happened.
You are right. The best defense is going public as much as you can. If anything happens this time the whole world will know and the guilty ones will
be brought to justice.
September 11 - Judge Imposimato denounces the CIA to Hague Court
The Italian judge Ferdinando Imposimato (photo) comes out with a striking complaint to the Hague International Court of Human Rights with a focus on
documentation of 11 September 2001. It 's the same judge who announced their initiative with a letter to the site of the "Journal of 9/11 Studies."
An event definitely out of the ordinary, especially as performed by a magistrate of great renown and experienced, which occupies an institutional role
(honorary president added the Supreme Court and former senator and deputy), and that publicly reveals a surprising and very detailed knowledge of the
facts. The complaint relates to criminal acts worthy of more elaborate "Strategy of Terror." Judge Imposimato has been part of the Bicameral
Commission Antimafia.The magistrate was present at some of the most important processes of the Mafia, Camorra and terrorism (the Moro case, the attack
on Pope John Paul II, the case Bachelet), discovered the "fake Bulgarian" and other international terrorist connections. Among others, he coached
the case Michele Sindona and the trial of the Gang of Magliana.
The full text of the letter personally written by the magistrate:
"The 9/11 attacks were an overall operation of state terrorism allowed by the U.S., which already knew of the action but remained intentionally
unresponsive to to go to war against Afghanistan and Iraq. Briefly stated, the events of 9/11 was a case of Strategy of Tension implemented by the
political and economic powers in the United States to pursue all the major benefit of the oil industry and weapons. Italy also was a victim of the
"Strategy of Tension" of the CIA, carried out in Italy since the massacre of Portella della Ginestra, Sicily, in 1947, until 1993. There is much
evidence of such a strategy, both circumstantial and scientific. Reports of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of 20 November
2005, they adopted the conclusions set out below. The planes that hit the twin towers each caused both a breach as well as and explosion highlighted
by a giant fireball while the remaining fuel flowed to the lower floors, fueling wildfires. The heat of the fires deformed the structures of the
buildings so that both towers collapsed completely from top to bottom. Very little was left of what it was of any size after these events, apart from
the fragments of steel and aluminum and pulverized debris from the concrete floors. Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed, too and it did so
in a manner that was contrary to “common experience of the engineers.”
The final report of the NIST said that the air strikes against the Twin Towers were the cause of the collapse of all three buildings, WTC 1, WTC 2 and
WTC 7. All three buildings have collapsed completely, but Building 7 was not hit by a plane. The total collapse of WTC7 has violated the common
experience and it was unprecedented. The NIST report does not analyze the real nature of the collapses. According to the experts involved in the
Audience of Toronto ("Toronto Hearings", 8-11 September 2011), the collapse had characteristics that indicate controlled explosions. I agree with
architect Richard Gage and engineer Jon Cole, both highly experienced professionals, who have arrived at their conclusions through reliable testing,
scientific evidence, and the visual evidence of unsuspecting people, including firefighters and victims. The influential theologian David Ray Griffin
has described the event with great precision so that the controlled demolition hypothesis should be taken into account. Several witnesses heard bursts
According to NIST the collapse of building 7 was caused by a fire caused by the collapse of the twin towers. The chemical and independent researcher
Kevin Ryan, however, has shown that NIST gave contradictory versions of the collapse of Building 7. In a preliminary report stated that the NIST WTC 7
was destroyed by fire caused by fuel stored in the building, while a second report this fuel was no longer seen as the cause of the collapse. Further
comments on the version of events given by NIST have been formulated by David Chandler, another expert witness spoke during the hearings in Toronto.
Despite the presumption of NIST on three distinct stages of collapse, Chandler pointed out that many videos available show that for about two and a
half seconds acceleration of the building can not be distinguished from a free fall. NIST has been forced to agree with this empirical fact as pointed
out by Chandler, and now understood by everyone. Peter Dale Scott, another witness at the hearings of Toronto, has demonstrated the existence of a
systematic pattern of action of the CIA intended to block important information with regard to the FBI, even when the FBI would normally be entitled
to obtain them. In addition, there are further evidence against George Tenet and Tom Wilshire. According to the former chief of the White House,
Richard Clarke (interview on French television and German as part of a documentary by Fabrizio Calvi and Christopf Klotz, August 31, 2011, as well as
an interview with Calvi and Leo Sisti ("The Made Daily ", August 30, 2011) the CIA was aware of the imminent attack of 9/11.
In addition, since 1999 the CIA had investigated Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hamzi, both Saudis, who have been associated with the American
Airlines plane that hit the Pentagon. The CIA was informed that Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hamzi had arrived in the United States in early 2000.
It is legitimate to infer that Tenet, head of the CIA, and Wilshire, according to Peter Dale Scott a "key figure" in Alec Station, blocked the
efforts of two FBI agents, Doug Miller and Mark Rossini, intended to notify the FBI that a center participants at the meeting in Kuala Lumpur,
al-Mihdhar had obtained a U.S. visa through the U.S. consulate in Jeddah. Professor Scott, based on the research of Kevin Fenton, cites 35 occasions
when the hijackers were protected in this way, from January 2000 to September 5, 2001. With reference to the earlier of these incidents, the reason
for this protection was, according to Fenton, apparently "to cover a CIA operation that was already in progress."
Further circumstantial evidence against Tenet and Wilshire is as follows. On July 12, 2001 Osama bin Laden was at the American hospital in Dubai. Was
visited by a CIA agent. This information was given to Le Figaro, who has also reported that bin Laden had been operated on in this hospital, having
arrived from Quetta (Pakistan). This information was confirmed by Radio France International, which revealed the name of the agent who met bin Laden:
Larry Mitchell. Tenet and Wilshire, aware of the presence of bin Laden in the UAE, failed to arrest him or extradite, even if the documents the FBI
and the CIA thought he was responsible for massacres in Kenya and Tanzania.
Insider trading is a further strong evidence against the CIA, the FBI and the U.S. government. The articles of Professor Paul Zarembka, as well as
Kevin Ryan, and others, show that such cases diinsider trading took place in the days immediately preceding compared to the attacks. Yet these cases
of insider trading have been denied by the FBI and the Commission of Inquiry into 9/11. Further evidence against the CIA and the U.S. administration
is as follows. Mohammed Atta, at least since May 2000, was under surveillance by the CIA in Germany, according to the 9/11 Commission, and because he
had been accused since 1986 of attacks against Israel, and because he had been caught buying large quantities of chemicals for use in explosive in
Frankfurt (The Observer, 30 September 2001). It was investigated by the Egyptian secret service and his phone was under control. In November 1999,
Mohammed Atta left Hamburg and went to Karachi, Pakistan, and then to Kandahar. Here he met bin Laden and Sheikh Omar Saeed (according to the magazine
specializes in internal security matters GlobalSecurity.org, under "Movements of Mohammed Atta"). After June 2000, the U.S. continued to monitor
Atta, intercepting his conversations with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, considered to be the director of the 9/11, who lived in Pakistan.
Strong evidence that the CIA was aware of the irregular movements of Atta from the U.S. to Europe and within the United States is the declassified CIA
document sent by the GW Bush (President's Daily Brief - Translator's note: "summary report daily to the President"). This document, dated August
6, 2001, says: "Bin Laden determined to strike in U.S.." He continues: "reports of illegal origin, foreign governments, and the media indicate that
bin Laden since 1997 has wanted to conduct terrorist attacks in the States. Bin Laden sought in U.S. television interviews in 1997 and 1998 that his
followers would follow the example of the aggressor of the World Trade Center, Ramzi Yousef, and would "bring the fighting to America. '"
After the rocket attacks on U.S. base in Afghanistan in 1998, bin Laden told followers he wanted to inflict retaliation against Washington, according
to a foreign intelligence service. A member of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad operative revealed as an agent of a foreign intelligence service, meanwhile,
that bin Laden was planning to exploit the operative access to the United States to organize a terrorist attack ...
A clandestine source said in 1998 that a bin Laden cell in New York was recruiting young American Muslims for the attacks.
This paper demonstrates that the CIA, the FBI, as well as President Bush, already knew from August 6, 2001 who had operative access. No one has
enjoyed as much access to the United States as Atta. But the CIA, the FBI and Bush did nothing to stop him. In Italy I gathered evidence that the war
in Iraq was decided by the Government of the United States before the attacks of 9/11 with the help of the Italian secret services. According to
Michel Chossudovsky, the 9/11 attacks were used as a pretext for war, having as a backdrop the many years in which there had been the creation and
support by the CIA's terrorist network now known Al-Qaeda. Today there is the danger of a new "preventive war" against Iran by the United States.
This could be terrible for people all over the world and could also destroy a large part of humanity.
The only way to get justice is to present the best evidence for the involvement of individuals in the events of 9/11 to the Prosecutor of the
International Criminal Court asked to investigate the basis of Articles 12, 13, 15 and 17, letters a and b of the Statute of the International
Criminal Court, recalling also the preamble to the Statute to recognize that these grave crimes threaten the peace, security and well-being of the
world and say that the most serious crimes that are of concern to the international community as a whole must not go unpunished and that their
repression should be effectively ensured by taking measures at national level and by enhancing international cooperation, and be determined to put an
end to impunity for the perpetrators of these crimes and thus contributing to the prosecution of such offenses; and recalls the duty of every State to
exercise its jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes. ... "