It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Fernando Imposimato, the President of the Italian Supreme Court, has raised the call for a criminal investigation of 9/11, comparing the terror attacks to the declassified "false flag" incidents carried out by the CIA in Italy under Operation Gladio.
Read more: www.digitaljournal.com...
In addition, Imposimato made a stunning revelation. "I have collected in Italy evidence that the Iraq War was decided on by the U.S. Government before the 9/11 attacks with the help of the Italian Secret Service," he wrote.
"The only possibility for achieving justice is to submit the best evidence concerning the involvement of specific individuals in 9/11 to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and ask him to investigate," Imposimato concluded
This is what it is going to take. More high profile people need to call for justice and a proper investigation, the people deserve more than what the 9/11 Commission covered up.
Originally posted by Aim64C
And, hey - did you know that the West is stealing Iran's rain?
The only reason you give this douche any credibility is because he's saying something that appeals to your paranoia.
The OP is not paranoid.
Did you call Ferdinando Imposimato a douche?
Ahmadinejad is not crazy. There is science behind his claims.
The only relevant question is if the West is doing it, and if so the difficult part is to gather evidence of it.
The old method of seeding via airplanes dumping chemical agents lost some ground to earth-based ionisers.
Ionisers are proving to have some edge over seeding.
The discovery that cosmic radiation can trigger or contribute to formation improved the science, and showed incompleteness in Weather/Meteorology science.
Originally posted by Aim64C
For example, the U.S. Civil war was over slavery, wasn't it?
Of course not.
Of course it was
The south had "free labor" in form of slaves, that gave the south better prices for their products. While the north had no such luxury, and therefor these slaves had to be removed, so the south had no such "free labor".
This just tells you, how "history" is reflected and understood. We are biased by nature ... and only with time, when the "bias" dissipates. Will the "real" history surface.
A scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.
The truth, isn't really important today