It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Presented of course merely as an "artist's concept" but this really is how ALL of the alleged images from Mars are presented to the world now and in the future - conjured in the minds and imaginations of artists and dreamers on the staff of NASA:
Originally posted by de_Genova
Presented of course merely as an "artist's concept" but this really is how ALL of the alleged images from Mars are presented to the world now and in the future - conjured in the minds and imaginations of artists and dreamers on the staff of NASA:
edit on 7-9-2012 by de_Genova because: text
Not speaking to the "Red Rover" nor to 'robotics' per se, but to the alleged mission to Mars with respect to NASA's propensity for fraud.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by de_Genova
Presented of course merely as an "artist's concept" but this really is how ALL of the alleged images from Mars are presented to the world now and in the future - conjured in the minds and imaginations of artists and dreamers on the staff of NASA:
Do you have any facts to back this rhetoric up?
Insofar as 'rhetoric' is the study of the effective use of language and as a consequence the writer demonstrates an astute and lucid ability to use language effectively we thank you for the compliment....as for 'proof' or the act of 'proving something' to an unenlightened listener or reader? - No comment is needed - facts and images speak for themselves. Its just the normal application of common sense that is at work here - that's all.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by de_Genova
Insofar as 'rhetoric' is the study of the effective use of language and as a consequence the writer demonstrates an astute and lucid ability to use language effectively we thank you for the compliment....as for 'proof' or the act of 'proving something' to an unenlightened listener or reader? - No comment is needed - facts and images speak for themselves. Its just the normal application of common sense that is at work here - that's all.
No, it is rhetoric in the sense of a verbal argument unsupported by either evidence or logic.
rhet·o·ric - noun
1.(in writing or speech) the undue use of exaggeration or display; bombast.
dictionary.reference.com...
Next time you quote from a dictionary - quote the definition in its entirety as stated below from the page you used.
I would like to know why the image was in need of manipulation and/or composite - ing by the technicians at NASA..
Originally posted by de_Genova
As long as we're on the topic of fraudulent NASA imagery via Photoshopping deception lets look at the enclosed image and try to determine if there is an anomaly here that could only be accounted for by means of photo trickery - of the sort that NASA is known for. The photo itself is self explanatory - is there anyone here that would try to explain it for us? I would like to know why the image was in need of manipulation and/or composite - ing by the technicians at NASA..
Close - up
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
If you look very closely you can see the fold does not make a perfect straight line either, which, in my opinion, demonstrates that we are looking at an actual edge and not a composite of two images.
I really dont think they went to the moon - but a Flight Psychologist on the radio said something that was kind of interesting - he said, that astronaugts practice and practice and practice so it is like second nature. and since they went over ever step of the mission at least 100 times, all it took was them to be put into a trance (which could be done via television monitor) and then play back one of the training recordings.... when it was time - they woke them up and put them to sleep several times over a period of days. and thus explains why we have different accounts of the missions non practiced events like the sound the lunar lander made taking off from the moon... some say they heard the sound and others said no sound.... things like that were not practiced thus could not be recalled. so the astronaughts could be victims as well.... the van allen radation belts appear to fry anything alive going through them. its a prison planet ...
Pictures speak louder that words - besides I refuse to waste my time on habitual (re:chronic) de-bunkers who fail to make a valid point.
Originally posted by de_Genova
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
If you look very closely you can see the fold does not make a perfect straight line either, which, in my opinion, demonstrates that we are looking at an actual edge and not a composite of two images.
Please stop making stuff up in order to refute a legitimate post............this is what the "other side" does. Do you work for the other side?
Pictures speak louder that words - besides I refuse to waste my time on habitual (re:chronic) de-bunkers who fail to make a valid point.
edit on 8-9-2012 by de_Genova because: text