It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SpearMint
Lying about what? I can't watch the video at the moment. If you're referring to the moon base thing, that's a prediction, not a statement.
Originally posted by de_Genova
Originally posted by SpearMint
Lying about what? I can't watch the video at the moment. If you're referring to the moon base thing, that's a prediction, not a statement.
Everything about the Apollo mission.................
Originally posted by de_Genova
Originally posted by SpearMint
Lying about what? I can't watch the video at the moment. If you're referring to the moon base thing, that's a prediction, not a statement.
Everything about the Apollo 11 mission in particular.................and the entire NASA Apollo program in general.edit on 26-8-2012 by de_Genova because: added info
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by de_Genova
Originally posted by SpearMint
Lying about what? I can't watch the video at the moment. If you're referring to the moon base thing, that's a prediction, not a statement.
Everything about the Apollo 11 mission in particular.................and the entire NASA Apollo program in general.edit on 26-8-2012 by de_Genova because: added info
Got anything to back up your claims? He does.
Originally posted by sprtpilot
It is obvious to anyone with an IQ over, say, 90 that the technology used in 1969 could not have done what they presented.
NASA admits to have used staged photographs and releasing them at the time as authentic.
NASA today is researching solutions to problems like lethal to humans radiation that they must solve to return to the Moon or go to Mars.
Only one element of the many has to be found to be scientifically bogus to discredit the lunar landing claims:
the lunar lander single rocket engine could not have worked;
the radiation danger was not solved, there was essentially zero protection while on the lunar surface;
the film photography could not have survived the radiation, studio perfect photographs are presented as those made by astronauts with no way to focus, set, or frame;
Originally posted by de_Genova
Originally posted by SpearMint
Lying about what? I can't watch the video at the moment. If you're referring to the moon base thing, that's a prediction, not a statement.
Everything about the Apollo 11 mission in particular.................and the entire NASA Apollo program in general.edit on 26-8-2012 by de_Genova because: added info
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by de_Genova
Originally posted by SpearMint
Lying about what? I can't watch the video at the moment. If you're referring to the moon base thing, that's a prediction, not a statement.
Everything about the Apollo 11 mission in particular.................and the entire NASA Apollo program in general.edit on 26-8-2012 by de_Genova because: added info
Got anything to back up your claims? He does.
Fig. 1. JEOL 6400 scanning electron microscope (secondary electron) images of lunar regolith and regolith simulant components: (a) plagioclase grain from Apollo 16 sample 64 500, (b) plagioclase grain from crushed Shawmere anorthosite, (c) glass fragment from Apollo 16 sample 64 500, and (d) glass from crushed fayalitic olivine slag from OB-1
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by de_Genova
Originally posted by SpearMint
Lying about what? I can't watch the video at the moment. If you're referring to the moon base thing, that's a prediction, not a statement.
Everything about the Apollo 11 mission in particular.................and the entire NASA Apollo program in general.edit on 26-8-2012 by de_Genova because: added info
Got anything to back up your claims? He does.
Originally posted by OutonaLimb
Have you ever heard of cold welding? I suggest you look it up.
Manned (or even unmanned) space travel is an impossibility.