How many times does Neil Armstrong lie to us in this 1970 BBC interview., page 12

Pages: << 9 10 11 12 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times

reply posted on 12-11-2012 @ 06:33 PM by smurfy

Actually, the interview with Patrick Moore was one of the most focussed interviews I have ever seen between two pretty innocent parties for the time, it was a discourse about the experience.
We know they went to the moon, that is not in dispute.

reply posted on 3-3-2013 @ 11:15 AM by captainpudding

I think this thread should have been titled "I think Neil Armstrong is lying because what he says goes against my warped world view for which I have no evidence" but that's just me and my desire to deny ignorance, not read about it in detail.

reply posted on 3-3-2013 @ 11:42 AM by jimmyx

Originally posted by PsykoOps
It's hilarious how well this thread demonstrated the moon hoaxer crowds. It attracts 2 types of people. The liars who make up the claims in their YT vidoes. After that the believers who dont even bother to check any facts see that and go around the web repeating the claims. When they are proven wrong they yell "NASA lies, We've proven it!" like a child with a temper tandrum and they claim victory. Never mind reality or anything like that

c'mon,...i mean people that question something the government did....that's never done here on ATS...the moon landing and 9/11 are never, ever, supposed to be questioned. only retards and idiots would do that.
now....anything said or done by Obama...those are always called into question...

reply posted on 3-3-2013 @ 04:30 PM by captainpudding

reply to post by jimmyx

It's not questioning that's the problem, it's the people that, no matter what the evidence, believe what they want to believe, even after being shown without any shadow of a doubt, that they are wrong. Trying to prove the moon landing happened to a hoax believer is the same as trying to prove evolution to a creationist. They don't care what the evidence shows because their belief system is faith based, not evidence based.

reply posted on 3-3-2013 @ 04:38 PM by iamusic

Originally posted by captainpudding
I think this thread should have been titled "I think Neil Armstrong is lying because what he says goes against my warped world view for which I have no evidence" but that's just me and my desire to deny ignorance, not read about it in detail.

Why are you trolling and reviving dead threads?
The Effery today!!!

reply posted on 3-3-2013 @ 05:47 PM by captainpudding

reply to post by iamusic

Could you perhaps try being on topic?

reply posted on 3-3-2013 @ 11:56 PM by Raffles

I've been a follower of the moon landing threads on ATS and other sites for years.

What i find strange is why would these so called debunkers come to a conspiricy site in the first place, and spend year upon year defending nasa ?

The only reason i can come up with is that they have an a motive, they will claim their presence is to "educate" people on the moon landings.

For this reason and for this reason alone, i'm now conviced the moon landings where a hoax.

reply posted on 4-3-2013 @ 12:06 AM by Bilky

reply to post by exponent

If there was focus then how did they do it while the cameras were attached to their chest with no visual reference? Just asking.

reply posted on 4-3-2013 @ 12:48 AM by AthlonSavage

The astronauts seem to be acting strange at that time in interview as if they are hiding something. They dont seem happy for people who just stepped on another world. Very strange.

reply posted on 4-3-2013 @ 04:47 AM by DJW001

reply to post by AthlonSavage

The astronauts seem to be acting strange at that time in interview as if they are hiding something. They dont seem happy for people who just stepped on another world. Very strange.

Please post a video of yourself giving a press conference after you have returned from another world so we can see how they are supposed to behave.

reply posted on 4-3-2013 @ 09:23 AM by captainpudding

Originally posted by Raffles
I've been a follower of the moon landing threads on ATS and other sites for years.

What i find strange is why would these so called debunkers come to a conspiricy site in the first place, and spend year upon year defending nasa ?

Quite simple really. The motto of this site is to "deny ignorance" the motto of hoax believers is "be ignorant". We come here to deny ignorance. Conspiracy theories need evidence, if you don't present any evidence it's not a theory. A real conspiracy theorist actually looks at the evidence and makes a conclusion, the hoax believers make a conclusion then look for evidence.

reply posted on 4-3-2013 @ 10:05 AM by Raffles

reply to post by captainpudding

Sorry my friend i don't believe that for a minute.

Why would a said poster spend 4-5 years posting on the same topic and nothing else for year upon year, it doesn't make any sense unless he has an agender.

I've been a member of this site longer than most and it this topic intrigues me more than any other, the amount of hatred that comes from the pro nasa side against the hoax side is amazing and also very telling.

What i want to know is why do you guys care so much about what I THINK ?

If i wanna think the moon landings are fake so be it, what does it matter to you ?

I'm happy to talk about the moon landings with posters like jra but not with the rest of the nasa defenders that have shown up in the past few years most are bunch of nasty posters imho, and i don't blame jarrah white for not showing up here, it would have been great if he did turn up and debated jra a class act imho

Guess what i've even had lunch at the kennedy space center with charlie duke, a moment i will remember for the rest of my life but having said that i now believe they where fake. and yes charlie was asked if the moon landings where fake, you can guess what his answer was