It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sirnukeem
Originally posted by shadowplaya
They have to get OJ 1st.
0j killed a cheating wh**e and her scumbucket bf.
N0t a child in c0ld bl00d, app*les t0 0ranges
Originally posted by spaceg0at
so this is my question....
is Casey Anthony still a milf ?
she's not a mom anymore but she is kinda hot
Originally posted by shadowplaya
murder is murder
unsolicited advice
The Supreme Court of Georgia has twice commented on Grace's conduct as a prosecutor. First, in a 1994 heroin drug trafficking case, Bell v. State, the Court declared a mistrial, saying that Grace had "exceeded the wide latitude of closing argument" by drawing comparisons to unrelated murder and rape cases.[8]
In 1997, the court was more severe, overturning the murder-arson conviction of businessman W. W. Carr in the death of his wife. While the court said its reversal was not due to these transgressions, since the case had turned primarily on circumstantial evidence, it nevertheless concluded "the conduct of the prosecuting attorney in this case demonstrated her disregard of the notions of due process and fairness, and was inexcusable."[9] Carr was freed in 2004 when the Georgia Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Fulton County had waited too long to retry him, thereby unfairly prejudicing his right to a fair trial.[10]
Despite upholding the conviction she sought, a panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals wrote in a 2005 opinion that Grace "played fast and loose" with her ethical duties and failed to "fulfill her responsibilities" as a prosecutor in the 1990 triple murder trial of Herbert Connell Stephens.[11] The court agreed that it was "difficult to conclude that Grace did not knowingly use ... [apparently false] testimony" from a detective that there were no other suspects, despite the existence of outstanding arrest warrants for other men.[11]
Originally posted by kurthall
reply to post by mcsandy
I agree with you, but please no Nancy Grace...I watched all of the Trial and if I were on the Jury I would have HAD TO vote the same. I watched Nancy Grace the first like two weeks of the trial, and after a week it was like she was reporting on a completely different trial. At first I let it go and kept watching, but anyone who watched Nancy Grace and not the trial had a very skewed opinion because of her. Now I know Anthony was guilty, but Nancy never said anything about what the defense was doing in light of what the prosecution was doing...It was just all "Tot Mom" Tot Mom" I lost all respect for Nancy Grace after watching that trial and her "reporting" on it..Hell if you can even call it reporting...Sorry I hope I didn't offend you. I did agree with you on everything but Nancy.
Originally posted by ofhumandescent
reply to post by Xtrozero
You don't know that for a fact.
I am a survivor of sexual abuse and my first gut reaction was pretty much what this article said.
caseyanthonyisinnocent.com... d-story-of-caylee-marie-anthony-casey-anthony/
You, me, all of us were not there.