It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Politicians enforcing child support laws do not contradict the cycle of pregnancies and the control women naturally gain through that process, why would it?
Alittle advice to men, keep it in your pants, because life isn't fair.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
They aren't baiting questions...they are very simple and logical quesitons. You are avoiding them because they prove you wrong and you don't want to deal with that.
If they lead to irrational conclusions...again...prove it. You keep making these types of claims without any proof whatsoever. You deem it to lead to irrational conclusions without any proof...now THAT is illogical.
Please, tell all of us what the "irrational conclusion" these questions lead to.
Originally posted by Hefficide
Only the third party in this is never addressed, considered, or given voice.
Originally posted by quietlearner
you like to speak of mother nature a lot, mother nature can be thought as biology
what you don't seem to understand is that biology says
that once a zygote is formed, it is not longer "the woman's" body
the zygote is a living separate organism
I'm sure mother nature has not planned for abortions either.
the zygote is a living separate organism
the natural thing would be to have the kid, unless there is a natural miscarriage
bringing mother nature won't help pro-choice arguments
it actually helps the pro-life point of view
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
Because women won't develop a judge of character in determining a mate
Originally posted by Happy1
reply to post by Southern Guardian
Maybe it's time for God to come into your heart and get some real wisdom.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by seeker1963
I'm trying to frame this in a way that focuses on the rights of the unborn. Not to discuss the politics. The governmental issues, except to say that the unborn have no rights and should have the same rights as anyone else.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
Why do half of the people that are pro-life, want to repeal the civil rights act because of "property rights"? Like Ron Paul.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by queenofswords
Yeah, I just can't wrap my head around it.
And honestly, neither can pro-choice people...that is why the desperately try to call it anything other than killing a human life...they call it a clump of cells, a parasite, a tumor, a part of the women's body...anything except calling it what it is...a human life.
It's hard to go to sleep at night when in the back of your head you are thinking "I support killing human children"...it's easier to create a justification and call it something else.
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by Golf66
Respectfully...using the "society's burden" argument is unfair....what is the actual percentage of society's burden?
Originally posted by timetothink
I was in this situation and neither I nor my child became society's burden.....never took a dime, not a food stamp, nada.
Originally posted by timetothink
And right now nobody seems concerned about society's burden of welfare cheats...the ones that have kid after kid on purpose and don't get married so the checks keep coming.
Originally posted by timetothink
Putting the whole above the individual is what leads to the worst of governments and societies, where no one is worth anything.
Originally posted by Happy1
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
How about outlawing abortion.
How about the death penalty for rapist and child molesters.
How about adoption for a first "unwanted" child and then sterilization for the woman, or the woman who doesn't want to support herself, let alone the "unwanted" child.
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
reply to post by beezzer
beezer, beezer
you are making the bunny cry
how can the rights of someone who does not exist, trump the rights of someone who does?
also, nothing is stopping xtians from popping out babies by the dozen
nothing
well, except they'd wind up killing the mothers
a line has to be drawn when they by lies and stealth
seek to force others, via the governments "monopoly on violence" to do the same
and thats the bottom line beez instead of practicing what they preach, they employ violence to impose their beliefs
the soul does not enter the fetus until its 7 month anyway
and a human beings soul does not fully integrate with the body untill its 30th year
soooo...