posted on Aug, 11 2012 @ 12:27 AM
Forgive me if I ignore particular countries or dictators for the moment and focus on the media but that is the part that has me wondering and relates
to you personally.
Lots of people will point out that there are many countries ruled by dictators who abuse their people.
I have head rumors that there is a deliberate attempt to spread Islamic phobia around the world and so I do not ask why we should or should not
interfere anywhere or if it is our job to play policemen to the world. What I wonder is with so many dictators, so much abuse of their population and
lack of democracy, why is the media paying so much attention to Syria?
On a more personal note, why with all the dictators, warlords, etc committing atrocities on a level far surpassing anything even claimed for Syria,
did you choose this particular countries' leader to rant about?
I find this curious or do I owe you an apology because if I check the archives I will find that you have started dozens of threads about the
slaughters and massacres incurred by various African leaders on their people?
If I look will I find a thread condemning China for their slaughter of innocent Tibetans?
You have written often about the genocides being committed by African rulers upon certain tribes living in their country? Or are you just another
Zionist stooge doing what he can to help spread the idea that every single Islamic country that does not follow U.S./Israel orders needs to be
So dozens of dictators torturing their people, why are you suddenly so upset over Syria who, prior to a new civil war begun recently thanks to weapons
supplied the England and the U.S.of A (pure coincidence of course) was not known for any acts of mass slaughter or genocide?
By the way, when you say 'reliable sources' do you mean those who agree with your point of view while any who disagree are, of course, unreliable
I remember that little girl giving her speech about how Saddam's troops threw the babies out of the incubators. I remember how that was reported by
all the 'reliable sources'
I also remember how when it was discovered that it was all a lie, that the poor peasant girl was actually the ambassador's daughter and that she had
not been in that country since before hostilities had started that not a single 'reliable source' retracted their stories or let slip the slightest
hint it had all been a lie. Pure propaganda.
If the man/government was as evil as you claim the whole country would be out supporting the rebels but so far it looks like this 'civil war' is
being fought mostly by foreign mercenaries. Why do you suppose that is?