It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
In this case, we are talking second hand smoke, but the idea is the same.
We can't kill the rapist...
Are you frigging sick in the head to think the baby deserves death?
Neither the mother or the child have done anything wrong.
Killing a baby makes the mother a murderer and the baby dead. If you can't see what's wrong with this, you are missing much of what ethics says about decency, justice and law.
Why is smoking the same? If that same father gives his children cancer from secondhand smoke, we would never consider killing the children because the cancer is a burden to the mother.
The only person that should have the choice is the baby.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Giving a woman choice is empowering her to carry the baby to term and allow her a safe environment to do this.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Let me ask you a question, if you had a daughter that was raped and she did not want to carry to term would you force her to have the child? I would not.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Giving a woman choice is empowering her to carry the baby to term and allow her a safe environment to do this.
That is not a choice, that is a directive. A choice would be to either terminate the unwanted pregnancy resultant from rape or to carry it to term, all on the prospective mothers personal decision. Not some Bible-wielding fundementalists.
It is imbecilic viewpoints such as this that make me reconsider my prediliction to frequently voting Republican.
Let me ask you a question, if you had a daughter that was raped and she did not want to carry to term would you force her to have the child? I would not.
Originally posted by W3RLIED2
reply to post by EnochWasRight
You do realize you have turned your own thread into a derailed pile of crap, don't you?
Unseat yourself from the high horse you sit on. Realize that your opinion is just that, an opinion. As such, understand that you are not as righteous as you believe yourself to be. Then GTFO.
One more thing.
STOP BEING SUCH A PRICK.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
A baby is not guilty. 5.8% of all abortions are late-term, not counting the abortions that are not considered later-term, yet take the baby at a state that it is feels pain.
Although I do not have a daughter, depending on her age, the choice would not be hers to make.
Call me all the names you want, murder is wrong, especially with a defenseless baby.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
A baby is not guilty. 5.8% of all abortions are late-term, not counting the abortions that are not considered later-term, yet take the baby at a state that it is feels pain.
Stop changing the goal posts. We were not discussing late-term abortions (which I happen to be against) but terminating pregnancies resulting from rape at a very early stage when you can unequivocally not refer to the zygote (morula) is not even a fetus, let alone a baby.
Although I do not have a daughter, depending on her age, the choice would not be hers to make.
I am not talking about a woman who is over 18. If your daughter was under 18, was raped and carrying the child of the rapist and did not want to go to term, would you force her?
Call me all the names you want, murder is wrong, especially with a defenseless baby.
You can keep calling a small group of cells a 'baby', you might as well call it a creamsicle, they both are as equally qrong a descriptor.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
A baby can never be considered anything but a gift.
Ending the life leaves scars for a lifetime.
Yes to the 16 year old and a loving environment would ensure that a short 9 months period of life is endured.
Seeing the world from a materialistic and purely scientific perspective misses the point entirely.
Rape is evil. So is taking life. Two wrongs do not cancel the first.
The notion that a baby is a hardship only speaks to our value of life.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
By now, I hope the moderators realize that no discussion of Theosophical Secret Societies can take place apart from using their own central book--The Bible. Please leave this in the proper forum of SS.
As you watch the video below, it will be necessary to read the first thread in this series of threads.
The first thread, Jimmy Neutron and the Third Eye Monkey, outlines the archetype word and message that is written into mankind's heart and mind. There is a central story that we all know and identify with. The law of inverse squares demonstrates that we can see the source of light clearly as we approach it. The screen that we use to see this light must be sufficiently broad by awareness to focus the image. As time draws to a conclusion, we are approaching this light to see the story in our hearts come to a conclusion.
Why is this thread relevant? The story in your heart is being manipulated with a lie. Why do you identify with the story that is common to all movies. Love overcomes evil and tyranny is trying to steal the love from you. This is the story you know. The lie that we can all see continues to use the same tactic as we have come to see from history. It's a type of false flag if you will, using the truth to perpetuate a lie that can be used for advantage. The liar creates a problem around the true solution. Instead of finding the solution, the liar makes the solution appear to be the one lying. Like Daddy Warbucks, the liar works both sides of the war, then makes themselves out to be the one with the solution. If you have read the first thread linked above, you will clearly see the lie being disseminated below by the handlers of secret societies. One thing is clear. They do not like God and his requirements for truth. The ONLY way they can disrupt this is to control the thoughts of mankind.
The following video is the lie of Theosophy. They take truth and wrap it in counterfeit. The counterfeit comes out as the video progresses. Slowly, they say that Lucifer is the true good guy and that God is the one that is messing with mankind. Masons are eventually taught this in their ritual. The central problem with this is the nature of the loving God and Father along with the first image of creation--the Son. Satan steals, kills and destroys. God honors, defends and protects those who cling to love and truth. Take these two threads together as a reflecting point to learn the method and lie of the deceiver as plainly seen by the truth in your heart.
In the end, we know them by their fruit. Follow the liars by their actions in this world. Who is responsible for dividing mankind and playing both sides of the wars for profit? Daddy Warbucks. We know who they are. They are the Moneychangers, High Priests of false religion and the Builders that reject the Son of God. They will do anything to control mankind and change God's plan for mankind. The video below outlines the lie they tell in bold clarity. He states it from the beginning. He is implying that YOU are really God. This is the same lie from the Garden when Satan told Eve that she could be LIKE God.
Remember to read the first thread in this series. Then, keep the main fact in mind: No counterfeit lie can enter the mind unless it is wrapped in some form of truth. You will see many truths in this video, but the main lie is the implications they draw through subtle deception. Your mind is geared with the true story written on the heart. You realize the story by hope for what is good rather than evil. Follow this common knowledge to see that the truth Jesus came to reveal is the actual truth. Do you know the true bring of light to mankind by his love and message? Yes. The manipulators can only use this truth with improper implication. This is the way they play both sides of truth to divide you against your own heart and the will of God for your ultimate good. If you love the lie, then you will likely be blinded from the truth in this thread.
If you want the correct version and key to understanding this video, listen to 2 Thessalonians 2.
edit on 4-8-2012 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)
I am seeing the empathic perspective from the point of a person who is raped and then does not want to carry to term because of that action despite what the ultra-relgious wackadoodles feel she should be doing.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
You are approaching this from a selfish standpoint.,,,You think this is about you. From this, you project this to the mother that is raped.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
A baby can never be considered anything but a gift. The child belongs to the mother and this never changes.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
You are approaching this from a selfish standpoint.,,,You think this is about you. From this, you project this to the mother that is raped.
Unlike you I am not thinking about myself and imposing my religious views on others. I am thinking about the people you wish to impose you religious views on and how you desire to inflict your beliefs on their life despite them not sharing the same viewpoint as yourself. You television analogy interspersed with irrelevant scripture passages does ZERO to convince me of your viewpoint.
Since you do not seem to avoid answering direct questions I will ask you again; if you had an underage daughter that was rpaed and she did not want to carry the baby to term, would you force her? Yes or no?
edit on 24-8-2012 by AugustusMasonicus because: Beverages 2:1 And the LORD said unto networkdude, yea, thou shalt have no beer, not now, not ever, for ye has sinned.
Yes to the 16 year old and a loving environment would ensure that a short 9 months period of life is endured.