It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
I say leave the politics for the politicians and the money making for businessmen.
Originally posted by pavil
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
I say leave the politics for the politicians and the money making for businessmen.
If there was no money......there would be no politics in modern America. But that's a whole other topic.
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by SearchLightsInc
Actually, no I am not.
Is Boston against business who have been sued for discrimination or not?
They are or they are not.... they cannot pick and choose what kind of discrimination they endorse!
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by SearchLightsInc
Well, consider this... Say Boston has high morals against any business who regularly is sued for discrimination...
logical stance, perhaps being sued means you break the law... and no such business that have ever been sued for discrimination are allowed in Boston.
This sounds find to me, I would think.
So why are there two Hooters in Boston? www.yellowpages.com...:restaurants&gclid=CPOgmof_t7ECFSMCQAodQEA AEw#utm_campaign=SEMPS_GGL_Search_acct=Branding_Dynamicads__cat:restaurants&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=hooters%20in%20boston
They are sued very regularly for weight discrimination, looks discrimination, and sexual discrimination....
www.wordonemploymentlaw.com...
Or does Boston discriminate against only certain types of companies who have been in the past sued for discrimination?
Originally posted by Chai_An
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by SearchLightsInc
Well, consider this... Say Boston has high morals against any business who regularly is sued for discrimination...
logical stance, perhaps being sued means you break the law... and no such business that have ever been sued for discrimination are allowed in Boston.
This sounds find to me, I would think.
So why are there two Hooters in Boston? www.yellowpages.com...:restaurants&gclid=CPOgmof_t7ECFSMCQAodQEA AEw#utm_campaign=SEMPS_GGL_Search_acct=Branding_Dynamicads__cat:restaurants&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=hooters%20in%20boston
They are sued very regularly for weight discrimination, looks discrimination, and sexual discrimination....
www.wordonemploymentlaw.com...
Or does Boston discriminate against only certain types of companies who have been in the past sued for discrimination?
Then Boston wouldn't have any large corporations residing within it's boundaries if they scrutinized them accordingly. It sounds to me they pick and choose because there are quite a few corps that have been sued. So far no Mayors have prevented them from opening branches within their communities. As the economy tanks farther down the drain we'll see how principled city mayors will be competing for corps to bring jobs and financial stimulation to their communities.edit on 26-7-2012 by Chai_An because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dorkfish87
I'm glad some of you Christians can finally feel what it's like to be discriminated against.
Try living with that feeling your entire life. I was kicked out in the middle f a blizzard at 14 for being gay. So yes when a company openly admits that it doesn't approve of my life, they don't get my money.
Any of you been kicked out into a blizzard door being Christian? Didn't think so
Originally posted by ViktorHaze
So, let me see if I got this straight....
If the head of a corporation that says he is against certain rights being available to a certain sector of society with a history of persecution and discrimination, because his faith (that is a strong or unshakeable belief in something, esp without proof or evidence, by definition), says he must, and by proxy his company as well, that is perfectly ok.
Buuut, if the mayor of a major city that has gone to great lengths to prevent further discrimination of this community, calls said corporation and it's sadly misguided leader on their bigotry (you can call it doctrine or scripture, but I have no such illusion), he is somehow stifling their free speech and discriminating against them?
Further, his efforts to legally block, what under normal circumstance would be considered an undesirable business (like it or not, civil governments not only have a right, but an obligation to do so, and like it or not, this chicken plucker is a bigot and thus undesirable) is discrimination?
How about the KKK?
Can they just go ahead and set up a lodge beside city hall too?
What if they just practiced their form of faith in the privacy of the lodge?
Would the mayor be justified in preventing that?
Why not, because it's not discriminating unless its a christian getting called on their hypocrisy?
Did you have your testicles in a twist when that mosque was going to go up by the World Trade Center?
I guess they had every right to be there too, right?
No?
I'm not kidding either.
I want an honest to your god answer, if you can manage to come down off the cross for a minute...
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by ViktorHaze
Gay Marriage
Ahh, i see that now discrimination has been proven, posters have resorted to playing down the fact that it has indeed happened. Yeah, only 12 times in 24 years, CFA are absolute angels of course! /Casually moving the goal posts.
Originally posted by ViktorHaze
reply to post by Tramadolnights
Well it is refreshing to see someone honest about their bigotry.
I'm not even gay, but you offend me as a human.
But, you still get to say it, as you can say whatever you want, and I'm glad to see you are happy to exercise that right.
Now, if only people such as yourself and Mr. Chicken Filly, and everyone else who thinks it's ok to stick their nose in anybody's business that doesn't fit their narrow point of view would just learn to mind their own, the world would be a fine place in deed.
That's what it really boils down to.
Does Gay marriage somehow affect you in a practical way?
Unlikely.
So why would you care.
Mind your own freaking business.
It's freedom of speech and personal opinion to say things like "i don't support those sexual freaks", and that's just ducky. Rude and offensive, but so are a lot of things.
When you state it as company policy (you really think they would hire a gay person if they knew they were married to another gay person?...ok, yeah,,,sure.), then that's what is at issue, and really none of that religious freak's (see, I get freedom too...Yayyy!) business.
edit on 26-7-2012 by ViktorHaze because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
Originally posted by Tramadolnights
That's alright, because the majority of people support Chick-Fill-A and would welcome them into their towns. Hell, I might write them and invite them to open a branch in London. I'd send lots of my money their way. Good on them for refusing to be bullied by the sexual freaks.
And i would happily write them a letter urging them to stay the hell out of this country, we have enough problems and we don't want to add bigotry to them.