It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ViktorHaze
reply to post by resoe26
What's with all the anti gay right's people on here, are you all ignorant stupid primitives or something?
What a ...
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I wonder... If a mayor decided that he didn't want a gay bar across the street from a church, I wonder how the responses would differ here...
Originally posted by ViktorHaze
reply to post by nenothtu
Agreed.
Regardless of the rationality of having to have government or faith based approval for marriage, it doesn't give either one the right to be biased about it and base their official decisions on it.
The whole issue of the mayor discriminating against the Religulons is a non starter.
He is basing his decision to oppose their permit approval on the fact that he finds a company that promotes hate to be undesirable in a tolerant community.
You can bleat "Lordy, lordy, da man is tryin' hold me and my god down", all you want, but it's a bogus claim.
It's also the default perpetual victim card Religulons play more than anyone on the planet...
Usually while hating on someone else.
It's no wonder places like Westboro Baptist church still exist and they haven't been forced into hiding.
I firmly believe that everyone of you gentle christians are quietly cheering under your breath for them.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"
Originally posted by nenothtu
That is where this mayor erred - discriminating against Christians in a political matter, when they were not discriminating against his pet projects. Merely stating an opinion is insufficient cause for action. ACTION is a sufficient cause for action. the mayor crossed the line, not Chik-Fil-A.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by kosmicjack
You could be right. We'll see how it comes out or if it turns into anything more.
I wonder... If a mayor decided that he didn't want a gay bar across the street from a church, I wonder how the responses would differ here...
The owner of the city's only Chick-fil-A restaurant today asked Mayor Rahm Emanuel to meet with her after Emanuel said the anti-gay marriage views of the fast-food chain's president don't mesh with Chicago values. Lauren Silich, who owns a Chick-fil-A franchise just off the Magnificent Mile that opened last year, wrote in a press release that she is dedicated to "serving all of our guests with honor, dignity and respect. ... We alone created 97 jobs this past year and our passion is building leaders for future generations, regardless of sexual orientation or beliefs." She invited Emanuel to meet her, her husband and management staff at her restaurant. The mayor's office had no immediate response. In an interview today, Silich addressed Emanuel's comments. "I get it,” Silich said in an interview. “I’m from here as well.” “I just want people to know there’s a local face to this controversy,” she added. “We’re not a corporate face. We love our city.” Silich said she would never discriminate against anyone and has gay employees working at her restaurant. Silich said she has deep Chicago roots and her husband Steve works for the city. City records indicate he's a police sergeant. "We hold fundraisers for hospitals, schools, fallen police, and we donate to a wide variety of causes, including everything from churches to gay and lesbian organizations," Silich wrote.
Originally posted by pavil
What exactly has the franchisee of the Chick-Fil-A in Boston done to the city of Boston to warrant such harrassment? It hasn't been shown that Chick-Fil-A's discriminate against any customers or employee's in any systemic way.In fact they hold many local fundraising events, sometimes even for Gay and Lesbian Causes.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
The Mayor is not discriminating against religion since he has not "come out" against religion but against bigotry - non-bigoted religious have not earned his ire.
If the bigotry is dressed up as a religious matter than that is a problem for the religious, not for the Mayor.
And if religous choose to participate in a political matter and express political opinions, then opposing those political opinions is also not discriminating against het religion.
Originally posted by yadda333
Originally posted by Chai_An
Originally posted by OpinionatedB
reply to post by faint1993
Nope, he just stated Chik fil A cannot open any business in his town....
thats railroading someone for holding a belief and having a political stance
it is unconstitutional
They are Discriminating openly against christians for their faithedit on 25-7-2012 by OpinionatedB because: (no reason given)
Yep Boston sure did. He also cut off revenue for the city with that stand, a personal stand at that. How's Boston's economy? Chik Fil would've brought jobs (construction and store workers) not to mention tax dollars to the city as well as monetary support to other businesses in the area. I wonder do the citizens think it was a good idea for the city official to turn away a source of money in a crumbling economy to take a ideology stand?edit on 26-7-2012 by Chai_An because: (no reason given)
Some things are more important than money. Equal rights for all and eliminating discrimination should be held above monetary gains.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by nenothtu
That is where this mayor erred - discriminating against Christians in a political matter, when they were not discriminating against his pet projects. Merely stating an opinion is insufficient cause for action. ACTION is a sufficient cause for action. the mayor crossed the line, not Chik-Fil-A.
The Mayor is not discriminating against religion since he has not "come out" against religion but against bigotry - non-bigoted religious have not earned his ire.
If the bigotry is dressed up as a religious matter than that is a problem for the religious, not for the Mayor.
And if religous choose to participate in a political matter and express political opinions, then opposing those political opinions is also not discriminating against het religion.
Originally posted by grey580
Originally posted by pavil
Originally posted by grey580
Y
Chic-fil-A supports hate groups by donating money to them. Nearly 2 million to anti gay hate groups.
Please prove your claim. Hate Group is a very strong word. I have glanced at the groups Chick-Fil-A supports, I don't think they fit the Hate Group category. They are against Gay Marriage that's for sure.
.
A hate group is an organized group or movement that advocates and practices hatred, hostility, or violence towards members of a race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation or other designated sector of society. According to the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), hate groups' "primary purpose is to promote animosity, hostility, and malice against persons belonging to a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity/national origin which differs from that of the members of the organization."
Here ya go.
linky
Family Research Council
Family Research Council Is Designated As An Anti-Gay Hate Group By the SPLC. The Family Research Council has been labeled a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) for its propagation of known falsehoods about the LGBT community. For example, president Tony Perkins has a long history of false and inflammatory attacks, such as claiming that pedophilia is a "homosexual problem."
Exodus International
Exodus International Promotes “Ex-Gay” Therapy. Exodus International is one of the world’s largest promoters of “ex-gay” therapy, the practice of trying to change a person’s sexual orientation from gay to straight. The organization refers to being LGBT as “perverse” and a form of “sexual brokenness.”
Sounds to me like it fits into the Hatred category of your description.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Maybe the local franchisee hasn't, but the corporate office of Chick-Fil-A has donated lots and lots of money to anti-gay groups that are working very hard to keep gays from having equal rights. It's more than just a personal belief - it IS action against a group.
Originally posted by ViktorHaze
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Why would I send him a letter?
I would imagine the neo nazi group operate out of one of the losers houses.
They don't require a license to operate, they aren't a public company....
If on the other hand they wanted to set up a recruiting office next door to the church, I'm sure the mayor would have something to say about it, and he should.
Are you saying he shouldn't, or is it only ok when christians are doing the hate rhetoric?
Originally posted by pavil
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Maybe the local franchisee hasn't, but the corporate office of Chick-Fil-A has donated lots and lots of money to anti-gay groups that are working very hard to keep gays from having equal rights. It's more than just a personal belief - it IS action against a group.
Again, is that illegal to do? I am pro-Life. Can I have my company donate money to causes I deem worthy, or is that not allowed?