John Moore Nibiru updates - can you afford to ignore this?

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

Here is what one country's top seismologist had to say

The list of quakes are normal for any day except for the large quakes.

Here we learn that the seismologist in question retired in 2011.
www.nineoclock.ro...

Here he discusses the possibility of quakes in his home country.
www.nineoclock.ro...
Others have this to say about his predictions

In fact, the former head of the Earth Physics Institute is criticised by other seismology experts for his hazarded predictions. After reputed professor George Purcaru, with the Frankfurt J.W. Goethe University and member of the European Seismology Commi­ssion accused Marmureanu of amateurism two years ago, Construction University structure safety expert Dan Lungu said yesterday the new ‘predictions’ have no real grounds. In Both Purcaru and Lungu insisted that Marmureanu does not have the necessary training to make predictions about quakes. Moreover, both specialists say that a devastating quake could happen any moment, but nobody can anticipate the exact year or the direction of the shockwave.

Sinkholes indicating geological rift zones pulling apart:

So I look at another stupid website you linked to and we see:
1. Florida sinkholes - NOT near a rift zone
2. California - NOT near a rift zone
3. Sweden - NOT near a rift zone
4. Oklahoma - NOT near a rift zone
5. Australia - NOT near a rift zone

Who is dumb enough to fall for these idiotic claims? I opened a thread about the claim of sink holes and no one gave a reason for sinkholes being evidence of an unknown planet.

reply to post by totallackey

So?

It was "men of religion" who did a great deal to stifle scientific efforts and critical thought. Including the notion that the Earth was not the center of the universe.

Click here for more information.

reply to post by stereologist


You provide nothing but your personal opinion. Which I find laughable and it would appear that very few people agree with your opinions. You present no facts but make claim that your conclusions are such.

Your skepticism is not based on truth. It is based on arrogance and only further proves your ignorance.

reply to post by FX44rice


Your kindergarten evidence is just that kiddie thinking. That's ok. It is in keeping with your previous posts.

reply to post by MagicWand67

You provide nothing but your personal opinion. Which I find laughable and it would appear that very few people agree with your opinions. You present no facts but make claim that your conclusions are such.

Your skepticism is not based on truth. It is based on arrogance and only further proves your ignorance.

Obviously you have nothing to support the unsubstantiated tale of Atlantis.

Post something useful if you can.

Originally posted by MagicWand67
reply to post by stereologist

 

You provide nothing but your personal opinion. Which I find laughable and it would appear that very few people agree with your opinions. You present no facts but make claim that your conclusions are such.

Your skepticism is not based on truth. It is based on arrogance and only further proves your ignorance.

Now that is a fine example of nothing but opinion.

reply to post by stereologist


I provide fact.

You provide bunk, dribble, opininion, unsubstantiated drool, wannabe science, nonsense, and downright stupidity from a complete and totally apparent model of establishment minion.

I'm waiting for a critically thought out answer from stereo, other than just pre-written garbage lacking any critical thought of your own. You're getting very weak, tired, old, foolish, tested, failed, done.

reply to post by Phage


Received the anticipated response. Care to explain why most early observatories were found in areas commonly associated with religious thought and teachings?

And why Herschel, Galileo, and Newton, were all deeply religious and why they have less influence because of their religious beliefs?

It is well known that there are some people that are attracted to subject matters that conflict with established thought. This includes believers in Nibiru. The more that evidence is piled against the impossible planet the more the believers sticks to it.

A number of people have made money dishing out the lies about Nibiru. These include Sitchin, Drunvalo, Hancock, Wilcock, And yes Moore. There are lazy scoffers that do not understand the simple fact that it is possible to make money off of false ideas such as Nibiru. They scoff and deny this happens. It is arrogance and sloth that leads them down this path of denial.

Here is a link to Sitchin's books. They have even been translated into Chinese, Italian, German and French.
www.sitchin.com...

According to Amazon

Zecharia Sitchin's Earth Chronicles series, with millions of copies sold worldwide, ...

Is that sufficient information for lazy scoffers?
www.amazon.com...

Originally posted by stereologist
It is well known that there are some people that are attracted to subject matters that conflict with established thought. This includes believers in Nibiru. The more that evidence is piled against the impossible planet the more the believers sticks to it.

A number of people have made money dishing out the lies about Nibiru. These include Sitchin, Drunvalo, Hancock, Wilcock, And yes Moore. There are lazy scoffers that do not understand the simple fact that it is possible to make money off of false ideas such as Nibiru. They scoff and deny this happens. It is arrogance and sloth that leads them down this path of denial.

Here is a link to Sitchin's books. They have even been translated into Chinese, Italian, German and French.
www.sitchin.com...

According to Amazon

Zecharia Sitchin's Earth Chronicles series, with millions of copies sold worldwide, ...

Is that sufficient information for lazy scoffers?
www.amazon.com...

Your consistency is commendable!

However, why don't you be the scientific nemesis to Sitchin that you falsely claim to be (of credible knowledge) oh btw (which you are certainly not), and challenge his theories head-on?

That might (slightly) improve your very, very limited credibility and opinionated (100%) statements to the contrary of his theory.

I love arm-chair scientists, always make me laugh and entertain me, and I must say you might be top-of-list Stereo. Thank you

reply to post by stereologist

Here you make the decision t hat someone/some group lied. That may or may not be true. Then you follow that up with they are a liar and will lie about anything. That does not logically follow.

It appears that you are making the decision that the government always lies and then looking for evidence to support your preconceived notion.

Get a grip. 9/11 was an inside job, They're complete psycho's to the extent that they make Bram Stoker's dracula look like a mosquito, they are possibly even the worst the galaxy has to offer, what's around earth.


Every 5 seconds starving kids of Africa dies, Please help

All by intent and design of a small group that run this world over with its boots, and threaten, bully, blackmail and use their weather weapons on any dissenters.

Not believing them is the most important decision, a life and death one even, irregardless of what is coming.

And something IS COMING.


Jesse Ventura Conspiracy Theory - 2012 Part 1 of 6

Originally posted by FX44rice

Originally posted by nancyliedersdeaddog

Originally posted by FX44rice
reply to post by MrXYZ

 

911?

Oh sorry you're right that offical story is "Air Tight"

What does 9/11 have to do with Nibiru, NASA, astronomers, ect. ?

Government lies.

Understood now?

So Government dishonesty equates to every conspiracy theory ever conceived being true?

No one will argue that 9/11 wasn't suspicious or possibly lacking in evidence. However you don't know what really happened, and to what extent it is valid or not valid. It is a controversy and if you want to point to unprovable theories as a support for your argument then you have already lost. Whether I agree or disagree 9/11 was an inside job is besides the point, as it still holds no weight in any argument related to Nibiru. You might have better luck trying to prove 9/11 was an inside job because the Government lies about Nibiru.

I haven't figured out if you are a believer in Nibiru or not. You don't give any credibility to John Moore and many other believers, while at the same time you argue with debunkers. Are you arriving at some sort of conclusion or just rambling?

If I misunderstood your comments please correct me. Perhaps you are using sarcasm... It's not apparently obvious to me if you are.

Is it just me, or do others also find it rather humorous when Nibiru believers make statements about Nibiru and they attempt to peddle them as fact?

How can there possibly be factual evidence of a fantasy object?

reply to post by stereologist

A number of people have made money dishing out the lies about Nibiru. These include Sitchin, Drunvalo, Hancock, Wilcock, And yes Moore.

Why do you mention all these individuals but fail to mention the larger entities that also produce shows and presentations on these subjects.

Discovery channel, History channel, other cable television channels and more.

These companies make thousands, maybe millions more, from ad revenue than any of the people you mention.

said it before...guess I'll say it again:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

even started a thread on it...

A Red Herring,perhaps?

reply to post by edaced4


The Internet is decentralized, there is no central point in the USA for total control. It was designed this way so communications would remain up in the event of an attack or crisis.They would literally need to manage each network pipe that crosses the border/ocean. Also, this would only affect American internet and anyone outside USA trying to visit an American website. Obama has this authority on paper, but anyone who thinks he has supreme control of the Internet obviously doesn't have a strong IT background. There is no such thing as a kill switch, and if he ever gave the order to cut American access to internet he would need to delegate all of those activities to Internet Service providers.

In the case of changing DNS records, it can take up to 72 hours for DNS changes to propogate around the internet. In the USA it would probably be closer to 24 hours or less for changes to American hostnames. By the time all DNS records would be propogated many people would have already implemented workarounds. When there is no internet word of mouth tends to travel faster than usual, at least that was the case for me during the 3 day blackout several years ago.

Also think of the economic impact it would have. Corporations would be the first to start taking government to court, and considering large Banks/Corporations funded his campaign I doubt he is going to exercise any of that authority.

Honestly though if I was running a country and I wanted to take everyone offline I wouldn't be public about it. I would just tell everyone it was anonymous or a computer virus... I still think its highly unlikely though.

reply to post by Unity_99


The Jury is still out on 9/11, while it does look like there was some level of insider knowledge of the event, and honestly, a lot of what happened does not make a lot of sense on a rational level, there still is no concrete proof that every level of our government knew what was going on and planed it. Heck I don't think (and I voted for him, so yeah I can say this) that Dubbya could have planned his way out of a paper bag without a set of plans, or someone pulling his strings, so that's one out of the equation... but, it still needs concrete proof that we may never have, to be able to say as fact that it was "an inside job" even though on the surface it sure looks that way.

You invalidated your entire argument when you started bleeping about starving children in Africa. I care more about the homeless people and families right here at home thank you very much and if some dictator or civil war is ravaging another country, you can't have it both ways. You can't on one hand state "We need to stay out of everyone's business" and on the other hand "We need to help all these poor children" It's a side effect of these countries, it's been happening longer than the United States has been around, and really, trying to use it for an emotional response to drag people to your argument is childish (pardon the pun)

But that's not what this thread is about, and it is about the NIbiru hoax, and yes it is a hoax, it's nothing more than a lets make money quick scheme, and playing on the recent fears based off a mistranslation. Heck even the Mayan scientists revised their end of the 13th baktun (which as I understand it isn't even the end technically, as there are dates past it) to like 45 years from now?

Your argument is invalid Unity, you cannot argue that because the government lies about X that Y must be true as a result.. Oh and leave the starving kids out of it, unless you want our country playing World Police, which you really seem not to..

reply to post by FX44rice

Your consistency is commendable!

However, why don't you be the scientific nemesis to Sitchin that you falsely claim to be (of credible knowledge) oh btw (which you are certainly not), and challenge his theories head-on?

That might (slightly) improve your very, very limited credibility and opinionated (100%) statements to the contrary of his theory.

I love arm-chair scientists, always make me laugh and entertain me, and I must say you might be top-of-list Stereo. Thank you

Once again you have managed to say nothing.

People do make money off of Nibiru as has been shown.

bump for reading later