It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NightFlyer96
This man killed 2 people, clearly he isnt safe to be around, the death sentence would clear the prisons of high risk psycopaths
and reduce the cost to taxpayers for keeping these monsters alive.
People say that the death penalty is wrong, but if some psycho murdered one or more of your family members, would you still want that monster to continue living.
Originally posted by Dizrael
id REALLY like to see a break down of how much it costs to kill them vs to feed and run the prisons for the extra men in death row.
pretty sure the death penalty can cost as low as $0.50 for a bullet...
Originally posted by CoolerAbdullah786
reply to post by crawdad1914
Good point, Crawdad. Although one doesn't need to look to the Bible for an example of this. There are many examples of people being imprisoned and changing their ways/outlooks (i.e. becoming remorseful of their actions and ultimately becoming better people). Look at Jeffrey Dahmer. While in prison he apparently became a Christian and fully expressed remorse over the wicked things he had done. And he wasn't sentenced death. So his life sentence gave him the chance to reflect on what he did and make a personal change for the better.
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by crawdad1914
All of the Apostles were sinners only to be changed by Christ Jesus.
Thanks for that post
Originally posted by CoolerAbdullah786
reply to post by johnnysixguns
Originally posted by crawdad1914
You are right, there are certainly examples outside of the Bible, but the Bible is one of the Holy books so many look to for guidance in this world, I figured the example of Paul's redemption one that may strike a chord with some members here in terms of this topic.
Thank you for your comment, and for this important thread. It has been a great discussion!
Originally posted by CoolerAbdullah786
Originally posted by kimish
He's costing the taxpayers money by staying alive, he did kill 2 individuals.
Not true. It actually costs more to execute someone.
Originally posted by HandyDandy
reply to post by CoolerAbdullah786
Why does a man's IQ have anything to do wiith whether a murderer is put to death? If anything, this man has proven to us all that he is not fit for society.
I'll ask the same as a poster before me.
Do the mentally retarded deserve life more than an intelligent person?
edit on 19-7-2012 by HandyDandy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CoolerAbdullah786
reply to post by johnnysixguns
OK. Well only a few counter points from me. And I will attempt to make this itemized and brief.
1. Regarding "an eye for an eye," how can one ever say that there is no emotion thrown into the statement? How can we ever say it is justice and not revenge? Personally I think an eye for an eye is nothing but revenge.
2. I'd rather my money go towards something useful like education, health care, social programs, etc. instead of prisons and/or the death penalty at all. But as I said we don't get to make that decision. I'd rather see the death penalty abolished completely. If that was the case it would free up a lot of money that could go to these things, or go to prison programs like education which can help reform prisoners which is what the point of prison should be. Not just a separation from society, but also a way to change them.
3. If a person who commits the crimes you mentioned is the result of a "damaged psyche" then wouldn't that be an argument against killing them? Something was clearly not right in their head so how can we kill them with a clear conscience? Shouldn't they be receiving help/treatment while incarcerated? To me the answer is yes.
4. Given the chance I will watch Lockup if it's ever on.
5. And yes I have read World War Zedit on 19-7-2012 by CoolerAbdullah786 because: (no reason given)