It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by XstanX888
Why are you guys over in the UK so f*** up over there in terms of surveillance? I just do see how it has moved that far.
Originally posted by SilentKoala
You can encrypt your own data yourself if you want it to remain private. There are several encryption algorithms out there that haven't been cracked.
Originally posted by notcanny
Change your DNS to 8.8.8.8 and the secondary to 8.8.4.4 (Google Open DNS) This will make it harder for them to track you! Also use Hide My Ass.
Originally posted by Unity_99
I recall a series of court decisions that disallowed for this kind of monitoring, so I don't think its constituationally legal and won't hold water. I suggest the telephone and cable companies don't do what I believe was disallowed in court.
Originally posted by Unity_99
I recall a series of court decisions that disallowed for this kind of monitoring, so I don't think its constituationally legal and won't hold water. I suggest the telephone and cable companies don't do what I believe was disallowed in court.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
news flash
the NSA already has echelon
read all about it
Originally posted by fakedirt
when you consider the amount of traffic that will be logged and retained, anyone using solid cyphers when it is noticed will be required to hand the keys over to the authorities if they suspect or have credible evidence of criminal activity. failure to hand over the keys will result in jail time innocent or guilty. it goes beyond the principle of privacy i suspect.
Originally posted by fakedirt
reply to post by XeroOne
of course it will depend on other information/intelligence on an individual for the judiciary
to make a decision and the 'forgot' argument will be taken into account. frequency of cypher use,
destination, affiliation, in fact the whole works will be placed upon the table, so, some kid
fooling with 256/512 with a classmate will not raise as many eyebrows as some individual sending
regular encrypted packets offshore, especially if in the locations of sensitive areas or privy to classified
content for example.
f.
Originally posted by Unity_99
I recall a series of court decisions that disallowed for this kind of monitoring, so I don't think its constituationally legal and won't hold water. I suggest the telephone and cable companies don't do what I believe was disallowed in court.
Originally posted by fakedirt
reply to post by XeroOne
the 'individual' would not need to be on-site per se. take logistics at airports/bases both naval and military, just in visual range would be enough to gather intel for a sitrep. walk to a flat, power up a second hand notebook with payg dongie and juice the airway.
i suspect the initiative will encapsulate all government departments. tax,benefit,immigration, again in fact all dept's will i suspect require access to these databases to cross-reference information to keep a handle on any and all individuals for the purposes of recognising activites deemed illegal/questionable, especially if the government can benefit from the gleaning of fixed penalties or prosecutions leading to financial benefit to the state.
Its already established that any data entering the USA can be intercepted by the NSA as at the point they get it delivered its not actually in the USA so all the stuff you pull in from abroad will have a 'checked by the nsa' stamp on the data packets and i'm sure the same happens in the UK