It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
in response to my reference of the APA article which recommended that the circumcision decision be made by the parents in consultation with the doctor and considering this, that, and the other.
If parents had the brainpower to discuss these things with a pediatrician and research the literature around it then sure, I would agree with you. Unfortunately, the majority of "parents" seem to think winging it, or doing what's always been done is a-ok in matters like this.
Originally posted by Crakeur
reply to post by RogerT3
this is nothing more than a means for Germany to tell muslims and jews that, perhaps, they'd be better off raising their children elsewhere.
If it was discovered that splashing water on an infant's face, or dunking them, ever so briefly, was akin to waterboarding and, therefore, was no longer allowed, I'd be just as concerned about the state of society as I am with this law.
Picture a child born with webbed toes or a hemangioma on their face.
It's how god made them, right? neither are a danger to the child. there's no medical reason to alter their appearance, other than cosmetic. Shouldnt' these kinds of surgeries be banned as well?
What about orthodonture? ask any child and they will tell you they don't want braces. the majority of all orthodonture is cosmetic. why aren't they banning the barbaric practice of sticking a metal device under the roof of a child's mouth so that, every night, you can crank that rack outward, widening your child's mouth to accomodate teeth? Believe me, having seen this done, it is far more barbaric, far more torturous than removing excess skin and, yet, there's no laws saying we can no longer subject our children to a year of dental torture, all in the name of straight teeth.
This law is b.s. It's nothing more than a masked way of telling jews and muslims they aren't welcome any more.
Originally posted by Crakeur
reply to post by ken10
no, Germany is bringing in this law for reasons other than protecting children. If they were, then there would be other practices that would be outlawed. All cosmetic procedures should be banned until the child is of age to determine whether, or not, they want the procedure.
Originally posted by luciddream
Currently in this thread the argument boils down to these..
- Religious/Right to perform the rituals..
- Politics, Germany "trying to get rid of everything jew"
- Health - is circumcision necessary?
- Cosmetics - Looks..?
- Tradition(non religious) - dad's dad have it, dad have it, so its okay and normal for me to have it
- Ethics - is it okay to do this? with no proven benefit? on a child?
- Peer pressure - Girlfriends, social normal in the current country...
Of course, everyone has a reason to do it, or need to reason to tell themselves that what was done to them was reasonable.
edit on 6/28/2012 by luciddream because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Women prefer cut men apparently in this thread. As if their opinion on this matters at all.
Men say they have the right cause their religion tells them so. So in the end they only gain pleasure from committing (selling) their children to their chosen deity. They do not want the children to grow up and have the choice for themselves. And god forbid (!?) someone would ban abuse of children who cant defend themselves they cry out "we have the right to mutilate our own offspring". That is just absurd. Just because the children are your own does not give you magical rights to molest them either. Also dont even try to argue with corrective medical surgeries as a point like one site admin did. That in fact reinforces the anti-cut point of view. It's a medical reason. If there is a medical reason it's ok to lose the hood.
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by PsykoOps
I noticed, after your first post, that Finland has a 0.6% circumcision rate. May I ask since you live there, is your country experiencing abnormally high rates of HIV/penis cancer?
CJ
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by PsykoOps
I noticed, after your first post, that Finland has a 0.6% circumcision rate. May I ask since you live there, is your country experiencing abnormally high rates of HIV/penis cancer?
CJ
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by PsykoOps
I noticed, after your first post, that Finland has a 0.6% circumcision rate. May I ask since you live there, is your country experiencing abnormally high rates of HIV/penis cancer?
CJ
That's exactly the point I made. We dont do that here and we're doing just fine. We dont have huge HIV waves and mens members "rotting and falling" like one member wrote here.
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by luciddream
Agreed. I again point to the fact that religion has intertwined with society to the point that this is a non-issue for most. I again state that religion makes otherwise good and moral people do immoral things.
CJ
Originally posted by SoymilkAlaska
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by PsykoOps
I noticed, after your first post, that Finland has a 0.6% circumcision rate. May I ask since you live there, is your country experiencing abnormally high rates of HIV/penis cancer?
CJ
That's exactly the point I made. We dont do that here and we're doing just fine. We dont have huge HIV waves and mens members "rotting and falling" like one member wrote here.
people just have to take care of themselves, you take a shower and you use SOAP.
you wash every little area inside and out, all over and your clean.
if someones penis fell off, its because they NEVER wash it, and it got infected.
peace.
Originally posted by SoymilkAlaska
Originally posted by luciddream
Currently in this thread the argument boils down to these..
- Religious/Right to perform the rituals..
- Politics, Germany "trying to get rid of everything jew"
- Health - is circumcision necessary?
- Cosmetics - Looks..?
- Tradition(non religious) - dad's dad have it, dad have it, so its okay and normal for me to have it
- Ethics - is it okay to do this? with no proven benefit? on a child?
- Peer pressure - Girlfriends, social normal in the current country...
Of course, everyone has a reason to do it, or need to reason to tell themselves that what was done to them was reasonable.
edit on 6/28/2012 by luciddream because: (no reason given)
this post is not directed AT you, and im not mad AT you.
ok?
honestly, im so mad, they can all go to %$^&! with their reasons for why and why not.
they do NOT have the right to cut a babies PENIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
im so mad that they cut me, THAT WAS A PART OF ME!!! i never said it was ok!
i would have been even angrier if they had "convinced me" at the age of 10 or something, and tricked me into getting it done.
ITS NOT RIGHT.
they should make you wait until your 18-20 and then NOBODY should pressure anybody into doing it in any way.
if you want it done, you should go and do it because YOU want to.
i would have NEVER done this. i want my tiny piece of skin back so bad. i feel like i never even had a chance.
peace.