Obama asserts executive privilege on Fast and Furious documents

page: 2
113
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 10:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by forevertruepatriot
This is total bull #. The president basically just exempted himself from the laws of our country. He, and his cohorts made a mistake, and this operation went south, and now instead of facing the music he is cowering behind his "executive privilege" like the scared dog that he is. I do not support this president. He is a traitor and a coward in my book.


It was not a mistake.

Obama and Holder have an Anti - 2nd Amendment Agenda.

That's what Fast & Furious was all about.

The strategy is to push all of the Fast and Furious bad news off until after the election.




posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 10:44 AM
link   
So top US officials can never go to prison, because evidence can simply be with-held.

This is basically the country's last chance to show they won't stand for this.



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 10:49 AM
link   
reply to post by Nspekta
 


Why has there been no move to impeach 0bama???

They know that they are in BIG trouble. This solidifies that.



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 10:51 AM
link   
This guys is dangerous beyond anything we've ever seen. I can't wait for November, and as much as I can't stand Romney, if he's the Republican candidate, I'll be voting for him. For the first time in my life, I'll be voting "lesser of 2 evils".


+3 more 
posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 10:51 AM
link   
reply to post by DarkKnight76
 


Bush was wrong as well.
Bush is not in office.
0bama and his Admin are in charge. Stop making excuses by deflecting.



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 10:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by macman
reply to post by Nspekta
 


Why has there been no move to impeach 0bama???

They know that they are in BIG trouble. This solidifies that.


Impeachment takes time.

The election is less than 5 months away.

Lets just remove Obama from office November 6, 2012.



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 10:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by Eurisko2012

Originally posted by macman
reply to post by Nspekta
 


Why has there been no move to impeach 0bama???

They know that they are in BIG trouble. This solidifies that.


Impeachment takes time.

The election is less than 5 months away.

Lets just remove Obama from office November 6, 2012.


I agree,but lets throw him,and Holder in prison,before that...................




posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 10:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by macman
reply to post by DarkKnight76
 


Bush was wrong as well.
Bush is not in office.
0bama and his Admin are in charge. Stop making excuses by deflecting.




- Deflect - Divert - Divide -

That's all we will see from now until November.

Obama can't run on his record. It stinks.



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 11:02 AM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


NO!!!
Impeach. Start the process now. 0bama is a criminal, along with Holder.



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 11:03 AM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


I see a GOP win,just running on the Fast and Furious scandal........



Obama couldn't save his Presidency,even if he made a movie of himself,as a Vampire Slayer.



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 11:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by sonnny1

Originally posted by Eurisko2012

Originally posted by macman
reply to post by Nspekta
 


Why has there been no move to impeach 0bama???

They know that they are in BIG trouble. This solidifies that.


Impeachment takes time.

The election is less than 5 months away.

Lets just remove Obama from office November 6, 2012.


I agree,but lets throw him,and Holder in prison,before that...................



Again, there is not enough time for that.

Obama and Holder are both wounded from the Fast & Furious Scandal and

the LeakyGate Scandal. The economy is also getting worse so it's basically

already over.

---------
Obamas speeches are not working at all.

The democrats are calling Obamas economic speech in Ohio a

falsehood wrapped in a fallacy.


Obama has no solutions. - 1 term president -



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 11:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by macman
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


NO!!!
Impeach. Start the process now. 0bama is a criminal, along with Holder.


Yes, i know but there isn't enough time.

Either way he is gone. They both are gone. Holder may resign in October 2012.

Just think 10 years ahead instead of 10 minutes ahead.



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 11:16 AM
link   
To me this is an absolute admission of criminal guilt. Not that anything whatsoever can be done about it. How shadey can you get? Why don't they say: "We will do what we want when we want with no consequences so suck it." Totally immune. No laws apply to these guys. What a fun life that would be.



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 11:22 AM
link   
Let me guess. When it does go to the courts, they will ask for an executive session?



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 11:30 AM
link   
We are living in times where the people running our country don't think they have to abide by the same laws as the people they are supposed to be SERVING!!!

How long until these scum bags propose the Constitution of the United States is outdated and needs to be re-written to be serve the people...of the NWO.

How long can they hide behind National Security anytime someone questions their motives or decisons?

How long are we going to put up with it?

Signed...sheep.



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 11:36 AM
link   
Is this a non-issue for those who are voting for Obama?






I dont see any of his supporters?



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 11:42 AM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


Remove Obama and put in Romney? Like that is any better?

Romeny is already saying he will attack Iran without congressional approval. Not to mention he has no military experience, isn't a general, and has absolutely no authority in the US to make a threatening statement like that.

edit on 20-6-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 11:44 AM
link   
If there is no justice, I pray for justice via righteous method.
I see alot of angry people.



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 11:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 


Remove Obama and put in Romney? Like that is any better?

Romeny is already saying he will attack Iran without congressional approval. Not to mention he has no military experience, isn't a general, and has absolutely no authority in the US to make a threatening statement like that.

edit on 20-6-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)


Exactly! The American people are screwed either way... its terrible! You can;t trust Obama, as this story is COMPLETE proof that he is a scumbag! Yet, Romney WILL attack IRAN, WILL get the U.S. into another war.. so whats the solution?!



posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 11:48 AM
link   
If we consider the way this is being disseminated, the sudden influx of "news" articles, who is and is not making this part of their "headline news" line-up, and what we suspect; there are a large number of things we can infer from this 'assertion of executive privilege.'

But first; a note....issuing an executive order for the purposes of limiting the dissemination of "politically" sensitive information that does not relate to "national security" is a mine field. Even Nixon didn't do it... opting instead to account for his actions....

If the President excises these documents from the public record (even based on "unknown criteria" then he cannot protect Holder from legal consequences in his dealing with the oversight committee. If he releases the documents, Holder can be 'saved' from the political floor show via a number of means, up to and including presidential intervention insofar as 'punitive' measures are concerned.

So why hide it? Perhaps because the social engineering agenda is too easily inferred from the effort? Or maybe it shows a corruption angle in Mexico-US relations... sort of how we bankrolled Osama back in the day... the exact mechanism of which we never really get to talk about. Maybe they arrogantly took a "calculated risk" which they refuse to accept was embarrassingly wrong?

Apparently the administration wants this to be a mystery of American history.... those are growing in number.. it seems.

Is there yet to be a political careerist who doesn't value politics over national well-being? I doubt it... this president's administration is certainly no exception to the rule....
edit on 20-6-2012 by Maxmars because: (no reason given)





new topics
top topics
 
113
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join