posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 11:48 AM
If we consider the way this is being disseminated, the sudden influx of "news" articles, who is and is not making this part of their "headline news"
line-up, and what we suspect; there are a large number of things we can infer from this 'assertion of executive privilege.'
But first; a note....issuing an executive order for the purposes of limiting the dissemination of "politically" sensitive information that does not
relate to "national security" is a mine field. Even Nixon didn't do it... opting instead to account for his actions....
If the President excises these documents from the public record (even based on "unknown criteria" then he cannot protect Holder from legal
consequences in his dealing with the oversight committee. If he releases the documents, Holder can be 'saved' from the political floor show via a
number of means, up to and including presidential intervention insofar as 'punitive' measures are concerned.
So why hide it? Perhaps because the social engineering agenda is too easily inferred from the effort? Or maybe it shows a corruption angle in
Mexico-US relations... sort of how we bankrolled Osama back in the day... the exact mechanism of which we never really get to talk about. Maybe they
arrogantly took a "calculated risk" which they refuse to accept was embarrassingly wrong?
Apparently the administration wants this to be a mystery of American history.... those are growing in number.. it seems.
Is there yet to be a political careerist who doesn't value politics over national well-being? I doubt it... this president's administration is
certainly no exception to the rule....
edit on 20-6-2012 by Maxmars because: (no reason given)