It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NaptownBrown
reply to post by boncho
An idea like this, which seems to have limited profitability (because you can't patent water). Probably will be bought and buried.
*
GENEVA -- Nestle SA, the world's biggest food and drinks maker, managed to brush aside the impact of a soaring domestic currency to post a solid increase in profits in 2011 as sales rose strongly, particularly in developing countries.
Originally posted by mainidh
reply to post by boncho
Boncho you cad, I didn't know you were a troll and cointel. You really should have a warning or a sign in your signature to let people know these things.
Originally posted by boncho
Here you go.
I am a disinfo agent.
Originally posted by Xtraeme
Originally posted by boncho
While this was all going down however, there have been a number of scientists that looks at mills work, and ... found nothing of interest. Not because it went against the mainstream but because it didn't make sense ...
I have no opinion on Mills. Though I would like to point out a curious dilemma I often run up against when engaging in technical conversations. More often than not this occurs when doing something like a code review. I can write efficient functional code (e.g. using C# reflection and an IL emitter) that doesn't make sense to your average run of the mill programmer. Without fail, if a regular coder who only has limited experience tries to review the code they'll bemoan how it's "needlessly complex and confusing." Does that mean it's wrong? Nope. It means that (maybe) it could be written cleaner. However in some instances, with, for example, policy classes, there is no way to make it simpler. I see a fundamental problem with scientific and engineering peer review, in that we expect breakthroughs for complex problems to come packaged using linguistic models that are easy and already well understood. I'm pretty sure whatever physics breakthrough we next discover is going to be a bit like Newtonian mechanics, and will likely require a new type of linguistic tool or math (i.e. calculus or whatever the future equivalent will be) to take us forward.
*
BlackLight Power Inc. has raised more than $25 million from about 150 investors. Prominent among them are multibillion-dollar electric utilities PacifiCorp, based in Oregon, and Conectiv, which serves Mid-Atlantic states. RS Funds, Eastbourne Capital Management, and executives retired from the top echelon of Morgan Stanley have also put in millions. With Mills holding on to controlling shares, BlackLight Power now is turning away private investors.
Originally posted by Romekje
reply to post by boncho
1.5 kW for a lightbulb?
You use stadium lights in your house? O_o
A 100 W unit is planned for completion by the end of 2012, and a 1.5 kiloWatt (kW) pilot unit that can serve the residential power market, as an initial target commercial application, is expected to be operational by 2013
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
reply to post by ManFromEurope
That is not a pessimistic view of live, but an engineering view.
I don't know whether to laugh or cry at what you just said. It's as if anything which generates efficient energy (NOT free or infinite) is some type of scientific blasphemy to you people (unless of course it produces a lot of radiation then it's cool coz there's a bad side to it). You are pessimistic, because you immediately think anything which can help humanity must be a "scam", and you base that on the fact you can't "imagine" how it would work. If you don't understand the theory about hydrinos then why don't you try reading some of the publications (I just provided the link) which attempt to explain the theory... god I am so sick of this world.edit on 23-5-2012 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ShadeWolf
reply to post by ManFromEurope
Hang on a minute. "Low-energy form of water." Why does that...it's Ice-9, isn't it? My understanding of physics is fuzzy at best, but wouldn't creating a new quantum state of water be an incredibly bad thing for the planet?
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by NaptownBrown
reply to post by boncho
An idea like this, which seems to have limited profitability (because you can't patent water). Probably will be bought and buried.
Yes, thank god no one is making money on water! Imagine the horror!
Originally posted by Kluute
reply to post by boncho
Boncho you make yourself look like a paid shill, I didn't come on ATS to see the depressing manner in which you post. Perhaps take a brisk walk out the office, get some fresh air.. you bitter old man
OT:
Very interesting stuff, will reserve any further judgement until I see some more sources identifying this.
Thanks for info
Flagged!edit on 24/5/2012 by Kluute because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wrkn4livn
reply to post by R_Clark
And this is new news? Anyone read about the water flowing in the quarts under the Giza Pyramids? There are theories abound how the pyramids generated power using water. Tesla used it too apparently. The problems is selling it. How will it be transported? Is it over the air power? I fear we will not see much about this due the current make up of our rulers. Unless the system is somehow started over, I don't see this going anywhere.
Originally posted by zarp3333
reply to post by TheRedneck
What fascinates me is the sudden apparent harnessing of plasma. The battery story stolen by DOD was one but way cooler was an interview with an Iranian physicist by Kerry Cassidy. I'm spazzing on his name but it sounds like a new type of "nuclear" energy but instead of splitting or fusing nuclei, we are tapping some of the energy that keep the electrons whipping around.
Originally posted by R_Clark
Electricity generated from water: BlackLight Power announces validation of its scientific breakthrough in energy production
www.marketwatch.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
CRANBURY, N.J., May 22, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Leading academic and industry experts have validated BlackLight's new process that directly produces electric energy from the conversion of water vapor to a new, more stable form of Hydrogen.
Experts agree that BlackLight's "Hydrino theory" represents a fundamental breakthrough in clean energy technology.
BlackLight Power, Inc. (BLP) today announced a major breakthrough in clean energy technology, which experts agree holds tremendous promise for a wide range of commercial applications. The announcement comes on the heels of Blac
I found this one, haven't read it all yet....it is fairly deep (for me, anyway)
Originally posted by TheRedneck
reply to post by boncho
Do you have a link to the patent? I'm assuming there is one, and if so, it will contain a complete description of the process.
TheRedneck