It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO Taking Off (1/27/11 Essie KY)

page: 4
8
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 11 2012 @ 12:05 PM
link   
watching frame by frame, the object makes some interesting shapes;





posted on May, 11 2012 @ 12:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by RoScoLaz
watching frame by frame, the object makes some interesting shapes;



Flames will do that and with the shakiness of the camera, it's going to blur and make shapes.



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 12:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by mookid
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 


Nitrogen flames?

If Nitrogen burns, people need to stop smoking, now!


That is from a special quote by Tesla as he said Nitrogen will burn as easy as
Carbon in the presence of his high frequency high potentials. So since I say that
UFO ships fly by Tesla tech the flames are a given.

Not unless electric cigarettes use more Tesla tech will we need to fear from
Nitrogen burning lungs out. Not to discount cattle were mutilated in a test to
see if their lungs could burn up due to so little air pockets in the animal.
So never run up to landing UFO ships like Walton and get out of breath.
That means winding up seeing Teslaship pilots with wigs and more coverups.



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 12:14 PM
link   
reply to post by B0Bthrob
 


sorry man i still dont believe any of it and possibly one of the worst ufo vids i seen in a while
anyone can make up a story to this vid.

and the video is to short and edited from its full length
edit on 11-5-2012 by Vrils r cool because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 12:22 PM
link   
reply to post by B0Bthrob
 


this object is not far away its closer than it looks and really 2 videos only 10 seconds long?

looks like a video cut from something longer and it definately doesnt fly away its the camera moving away.

someone is just pulling your leg.



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 12:33 PM
link   
This is nothing more than the underside of a streetlight filmed late at night, through some kind of filter. The shaky camera is intentional, in order to make it harder to see what it is. Next.



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 01:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by NeoVain
This is nothing more than the underside of a streetlight filmed late at night, through some kind of filter. The shaky camera is intentional, in order to make it harder to see what it is. Next.


I was just about to post that same statement.

I agree, looks like the underside of a bell shaped street lamp from a distance of 100-200 yards. ALL movement IMO is nothing more than the camera moving, I would put my money on this being a stationary object.

Sorry OP, but I believe either your uncle is pulling your leg, or you are trying to pull ours. Even if this video was legit, and I am certain it is not, this type of video is 100% useless. How is anyone going to conclude this to be a flying object when shot against a backdrop with no reference point, and no clarity?

As Neo said... Next.



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 01:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Char-Lee
reply to post by B0Bthrob
 


I am sure by now someone has mentioned this, but your uncle says the object was as small as an ant yet only 100 ft in the air and HUGE 40 x 100 ft.??

If I read that correctly, have you a 100 ft outdoor power cord? Not that long.


He said IF it was 100 ft in the air. He said it was around 1500 ft in the sky.



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 01:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by intrptr
The other new misread aerial phenom and oft filmed lately are these damn cursed...



Although I don't know what this one is doing advertising at 4 am?

Edit: Oh, and the sound... could... be ... engines?
edit on 11-5-2012 by intrptr because: Additional...


I find it hard to believe that a commercial blimp would be floating around at 4 in the morning in an area that only has around 400 people.



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 01:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by SavedOne



It almost looked like a tiny ant from where I was standing. I could tell that the top of it was spinning around and the bottom was too. The top dome was spinning to the right and the bottom dome was spinning to the left. The entire craft was glowing except for the inner part, which was dark.


If it was so far away that it appeared to be a tiny ant to him, then how in the world was he able to describe it in such detail? Color me skeptical.


I can describe to you a plane in the sky so what makes you think that someone couldn't describe a glowing object in the sky at around the same distance?



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 01:25 PM
link   
Well it looks like you guys have solved this scooby doo mystery. great job gang


This place is full of extremes. Either you don't believe in anything or you believe in everything. I try to stay in the middle. I am on my family member's side. I trust him and I hope that you would and could trust your own closest family members when it came to something like this being handed to you. I believe he saw what he said he saw. The guy doesn't spend his time trying to fake ufo videos. He spends his time in a coal mine. I had to ask him for this video, otherwise he would've kept it hidden. He gains nothing from this and isn't trying to. I honestly feel bad for anyone on this site and others like it who have uploaded something they truly can't explain and truly didn't hoax, only to be called a liar.

Like I posted in my other thread, I believe we aren't capable of fully accepting the reality of the ufo phenomenon or the possibility of other life. Not long ago African Americans weren't allowed to drink from the same fountain or use the same bathroom. If we had a hard time accepting black people as human beings then what makes us think we could even dream of accepting other life or dare I say other dimensions? If you look at the past, humans tend to disbelieve or ignore, with great consistency, any new idea or theory (gravity, round earth, evolution, etc.)

To be honest, I don't think it matters what we upload on here or talk about. I don't think we are evolved enough to get anything out of sites like this. It's all just endless arguments. There's a place that exists where you can communicate with virtually anyone around the world. A place called the internet. It's amazing when you think about it, but look at the top videos on youtube. Because of the internet, we are able to instantly find an answer to virtually any question. Instead of learning, helping each other and becoming closer, humans sit in front of this universe of information and watch porn or argue with each other. I get on sites like youtube and instead of reading constructive comments, I see endless debates that remind me of monkeys throwing their own poop at each other.

We aren't ready for the technology we have. It's evolving way faster than we are. I'm annoyed and disappointed by the current state of human beings. I remain hopeful though.
edit on 11-5-2012 by B0Bthrob because: typos



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 01:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by B0Bthrob I don't think we are evolved enough to get anything out of sites like this. It's all just endless arguments. There's a place that exists where you can communicate with virtually anyone around the world. A place called the internet. It's amazing when you think about it, but look at the top videos on youtube. Because of the internet, we are able to instantly find an answer to virtually any question. Instead of learning, helping each other and becoming closer, humans sit in front of this universe of information and watch porn or argue with each other. I get on sites like youtube and instead of reading constructive comments, I see endless debates that remind me of monkeys throwing their own poop at each other.


i agree, although i would replace 'we' in the first sentence with 'enough of us'.



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 01:47 PM
link   
enlightened one,

I'm not for or against this video, however to dismiss it because the guy wasn't hollering like some yokle, going "holy smoke's bubba it's one of dem martians planes! Quick everybody into the shelter! I was right the aliens are coming!"

Or didn't seem terrified and scream.

I've seen a UFO on two separate occasions. Both times I was stunned into silence. you are too busy trying to assimilate what you are seeing and your senses are too busy trying to get any and all available data that you just simply don't talk. that's a misnomer.

On one of the occasions I was with my sister. we both communicated to each other with looks and nods and basic body language cause we were too stunned to talk.

SO you can't say FAKE just because the guy isn't animated and freaking out.

Besideds the think wasn't being hostile or doing anything threatening. so why freak.



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 03:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by intrptr
 

The other new misread aerial phenom and oft filmed lately are these damn cursed...


Although I don't know what this one is doing advertising at 4 am?

Edit: Oh, and the sound... could... be ... engines?


Originally posted by B0Bthrob
 

I find it hard to believe that a commercial blimp would be floating around at 4 in the morning in an area that only has around 400 people.

Well, yah. Except there it is.
The sound of engines...
Dimensions 40 foot by 100 feet... spot on I'd say.
1500 foot altitude (returning to airport) and if they fly they advertise regaardless.
Lastly, these have large display billboards that oscillate to get your attention . Witness states that he saw "rotating" something or other. He really saw what he saw, it was really there, just maybe explainable from eyewitness report and video. Heres another...


And a bunch more, knock yourself out.

Blimps fimed at night



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 03:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by B0Bthrob
Fair enough I suppose. Although, I think something like christmas lights can be ruled out because he was aiming at the sky and he knows that area like the back of his hand. He's not ignorant.

Yes, well, that's just part of the story of the old trustworthy uncle in the hills, isn't it? Again, no offense. But I have no reason to believe you.
edit on 11-5-2012 by Blue Shift because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 04:52 PM
link   
reply to post by B0Bthrob
 
Just another boring story IMO.... This could be footage of a light at the end of someone's garden for all we know zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

At the end of the day one either believes what they're told or they don't--- without any evidence what so ever I personally choose not to believe that what I'm being told is what is being claimed



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 05:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by intrptr


Originally posted by intrptr
 

The other new misread aerial phenom and oft filmed lately are these damn cursed...


Although I don't know what this one is doing advertising at 4 am?

Edit: Oh, and the sound... could... be ... engines?


Originally posted by B0Bthrob
 

I find it hard to believe that a commercial blimp would be floating around at 4 in the morning in an area that only has around 400 people.

Well, yah. Except there it is.
The sound of engines...
Dimensions 40 foot by 100 feet... spot on I'd say.
1500 foot altitude (returning to airport) and if they fly they advertise regaardless.
Lastly, these have large display billboards that oscillate to get your attention . Witness states that he saw "rotating" something or other. He really saw what he saw, it was really there, just maybe explainable from eyewitness report and video. Heres another...


And a bunch more, knock yourself out.

Blimps fimed at night


I respect your opinion. I just don't agree with it. It looks similar but it's not quite what he described or filmed. He said it flew off at unbelievable speed and caused his camera to turn off, which is what the video shows. I believe him. You don't. Let's just leave it at that.



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 05:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by dejarmaX
reply to post by B0Bthrob
 
Just another boring story IMO.... This could be footage of a light at the end of someone's garden for all we know zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

At the end of the day one either believes what they're told or they don't--- without any evidence what so ever I personally choose not to believe that what I'm being told is what is being claimed



The difference between me and you is I trust my own family member and you don't trust someone you don't know. That's natural and you are free to believe what you want.



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 05:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by Blue Shift

Originally posted by B0Bthrob
Fair enough I suppose. Although, I think something like christmas lights can be ruled out because he was aiming at the sky and he knows that area like the back of his hand. He's not ignorant.

Yes, well, that's just part of the story of the old trustworthy uncle in the hills, isn't it? Again, no offense. But I have no reason to believe you.
edit on 11-5-2012 by Blue Shift because: (no reason given)


No offense taken. Let's just agree to disagree shall we?



posted on May, 11 2012 @ 06:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by B0Bthrob

Originally posted by dejarmaX
reply to post by B0Bthrob
 
Just another boring story IMO.... This could be footage of a light at the end of someone's garden for all we know zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

At the end of the day one either believes what they're told or they don't--- without any evidence what so ever I personally choose not to believe that what I'm being told is what is being claimed



The difference between me and you is I trust my own family member and you don't trust someone you don't know. That's natural and you are free to believe what you want.
The difference between me and you is: I'm street wise enough to know that 'most' would treat this kind of claim in the same way I have (whether or not you 'believe' it to be true is irrelevant) & wouldn't bother putting it into the public domain for this very reason!
edit on 11-5-2012 by dejarmaX because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
8
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join