It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HumansBeing
Is he dead??? Yes... so whats the problem?
Originally posted by JohhnyBGood
Well since the only people that ever hear this will be those that visit conspiracy sites or watch Fox news - then it might as well have happened the way Obama claims - # I'm surprised they didn't show Barry sliding down a rope from a chopper and having a sword fight with OBL.
Originally posted by digital01anarchy
you forget Pakistan would have tipped Osama off
Originally posted by BluFenix
Seriously, think on this for a second. Try to understand the implications of going in there. It is a big, huge, sensitive operation that takes time to undergo.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Really?
Now Obama opponents are going to claim that he even though he did kill OBL, that he could have done so sooner, but decided not to, so therefore he's a bad President right?
I mean really, stop grasping at straws.
How dare Obama run a re-election campaign using his accomplishments
Originally posted by spinalremain
You're nitpicking and spewing sour grapes.
If he knew where he was in 2010 then he had 1 year to keep a watch on him.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by HumansBeing
Is he dead??? Yes... so whats the problem?
You are kidding, right? According to this general ... The Commander in Chief of the US MIlitary knew where the worlds most wanted fugative was .. a terrorist who was on the top of the 'most wanted' list ... a freak who mass murdered thousands of Americans .. and this Commander in Chief of ours just sat on his butt. Not because he was being careful or thoughtful in regards to Pakistan .. but he just sat on his freak'n backend and did nothing.
I'd bet a box of donuts he hoped UBL would get away so he wouldn't have to deal with it.
I'll never be able to prove it. But it wouldn't surprise me at all.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by spinalremain
You're nitpicking and spewing sour grapes.
It isn't 'nitpicking' to expect the Commander in Chief to do his damn job.
If he knew where he was in 2010 then he had 1 year to keep a watch on him.
There was no reason to 'keep watch on him'.
There was every reason to go get him and end our involvement over there.
Obama purposely let it go on for another year. WHY?
Why drag it out? Incompetence? Indecision?
Or is he more of a war-monger than his followers want to admit?
Originally posted by jimmyx
so what?...maybe it took time to confirm?...maybe it took time to set up a plan
GO GET A LIFE!
Obama got him, and your pansy-assed, big talking, war-monger, george bush didn't
Originally posted by jimmyx
this is just a useless rant by right-wingers, with no substance.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Right. Do you understand WHY it makes him a bad president? The fact that almost a full year of engagement over there was taking place that was unnecessary. That we had undercover assets in danger for that year? That people may have died who didn't need to? That there was a HUGE risk that UBL could have gotten away. All because Obama sat on his butt and did nothing for a year.
I mean really, stop making excuses for him.
How dare Obama run a re-election campaign using OTHER PEOPLEs accomplishments, especially now that the evidence is out that he dragged his feet and didnt' even want to engage in the act that he's taking credit for.