Ron Paul wins Louisiana , page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 83 times


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 12:43 PM by swoopaloop
reply to post by Furbs



lmao furbs, why aren't you supporting Paul? Rather support Dumbledore?


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 12:44 PM by Furbs
reply to post by swoopaloop



Dumbledore is polling better than Ron Paul, so why not?


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 12:46 PM by PhysicsAdept
reply to post by Furbs



Here, a source that is specifically associated with Louisiana, nothing else.

Louisiana Political News Wire

WASHINGTON -- Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, dominated the Louisiana Republican caucuses held Saturday. The results guarantee he will have a strong presence in the state's delegation to the Republican National Convention in August, even if he has little hope of winning the party's presidential nomination. The caucuses were held in the state's six newly drawn congressional districts. While the presidential preferences of the delegates were not identified on the caucus ballots, delegates who back the libertarian congressman, who is now the only one of Mitt Romney's adversaries still standing, won the lion's share of the contests, carrying the 1st, 2nd, 5th and 6th Congressional Districts. As a result, under party rules, Paul is guaranteed at least 17 of the 46 delegates to the convention...


I snipped the end of the quote because I figured you wanted me to leave opinions out of it



reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 12:47 PM by Doalrite
Originally posted by Furbs
reply to
post by swoopaloop



Dumbledore is polling better than Ron Paul, so why not?


If you don't have a link to this then it is a hoax and off topic.

Of course you could always post facts, or factual opinion, or anything besides dribble


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 12:47 PM by Furbs
Originally posted by PhysicsAdept
reply to
post by Furbs



Yeah using political organizations for political information is not ok. Ever.

But using Wikipedia is


All political organizations are inherently biased, hence why they aren't a good source for information.

The wikipedia article is sourced from the United States Constitution, so.. yeah.. that wikipedia article was an -unbiased- source of -factual- information.

See the difference?
edit on 29-4-2012 by Furbs because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 12:49 PM by PhysicsAdept
reply to post by Furbs



Yeah and that is true that no one can edit anything on Wikipedia with such high prestige.

I gave you another link, Mr. Potter.


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 12:50 PM by Furbs
Originally posted by Doalrite
Originally posted by Furbs
reply to
post by swoopaloop



Dumbledore is polling better than Ron Paul, so why not?


If you don't have a link to this then it is a hoax and off topic.

Of course you could always post facts, or factual opinion, or anything besides dribble


Here you go.

answers.yahoo.com...


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 12:50 PM by swoopaloop
reply to post by Furbs



No, Seriously. Why aren't you supporting Paul? Rather a Puppet be your president?


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 12:54 PM by DrEugeneFixer
reply to post by Furbs



What is amazing to me is the sheer unreality of it all-- It's like the Ron Paul Campaign and his followers inhabit an alternate dimension where he's been the inevitable victor the whole time. All the normal rules people follow for deciding who won elections, are ignored, and victory is claimed time and time again, no matter the outcome. If not in the popular vote, then in the delegates.

My prediction: most of these press releases are just bull, put out by the paul campaign, and the only people they are intended to fool are his massive herd of sheep- the better to fleece them. In the end there are going to be a lot of confused and angry Paul supporters after nothing happens at the convention. It will be a very unpleasant moment of truth. At that point the story will change to 1. We wuz robbed, 2. It was all about waking people up. 3. Rand Paul 2016! The official campaign will go with 2 and 3.


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 12:56 PM by swoopaloop
reply to post by DrEugeneFixer



And why aren't you supporting him? Do you also want to have a puppet as the american president?


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 01:04 PM by DrEugeneFixer
reply to post by swoopaloop



There are many reasons to disregard the value of a Ron Paul presidency. His favored policies are delusional, and his record as a Representative from Texas is totally negligible. He has a history of pandering to poorly educated racists and the most paranoid and deluded of the republican base. His association with numerous fringe groups, such as the Mises Institute makes me think he's likely to put some of their nutty members in any possible cabinet. The fake eyebrows are creepy. Finally, his supporters have formed a strange cult of personality about him, more extreme than anything I have witnessed in this country.

That about covers it.



reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 01:04 PM by captainnotsoobvious
Originally posted by epsilon69
reply to
post by The_Zomar



Awesome!

Can't wait to see this one on CNN. Maybe they will have to admit that Ron Paul has a serious chance of beating Romney and Obama after all?
edit on 28-4-2012 by epsilon69 because: grammer


Bwahahahahahhaha!

Hilarity.


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 01:06 PM by Doalrite
Originally posted by DrEugeneFixer
reply to
post by swoopaloop



There are many reasons to disregard the value of a Ron Paul presidency. His favored policies are delusional, and his record as a Representative from Texas is totally negligible. He has a history of pandering to poorly educated racists and the most paranoid and deluded of the republican base. His association with numerous fringe groups, such as the Mises Institute makes me think he's likely to put some of their nutty members in any possible cabinet. The fake eyebrows are creepy. Finally, his supporters have formed a strange cult of personality about him, more extreme than anything I have witnessed in this country.

That about covers it.


Anyone that takes anything you have to say seriously only need to read over your past post, as an admitted shill your opinion is the only thing that should be disregarded..

The true cult are those against him with their hate and filth... I would tell you to join a club but I'm guessing you already belong to one


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 01:07 PM by captainnotsoobvious
Originally posted by Furbs
reply to
post by swoopaloop



Dumbledore is polling better than Ron Paul, so why not?


Ha!

Can't wait to see all the excuses Paultards will make when Paul finally fails. Counting the days.


reply posted on 29-4-2012 @ 01:15 PM by RSF77
Originally posted by DrEugeneFixer
reply to
post by Furbs



What is amazing to me is the sheer unreality of it all-- It's like the Ron Paul Campaign and his followers inhabit an alternate dimension where he's been the inevitable victor the whole time. All the normal rules people follow for deciding who won elections, are ignored, and victory is claimed time and time again, no matter the outcome. If not in the popular vote, then in the delegates.

My prediction: most of these press releases are just bull, put out by the paul campaign, and the only people they are intended to fool are his massive herd of sheep- the better to fleece them. In the end there are going to be a lot of confused and angry Paul supporters after nothing happens at the convention. It will be a very unpleasant moment of truth. At that point the story will change to 1. We wuz robbed, 2. It was all about waking people up. 3. Rand Paul 2016! The official campaign will go with 2 and 3.


Really? What amazes me is the sheer reality of it all. Puppet president after puppet president sending our boys and girls off to war, one guy comes along and wants to end the war and any support he gets is called propaganda and "fanatical" or "cult-like".

Everything published about Ron Paul is "bull" but the lack of mainstream media coverage of it is just plain normal huh? Romney is magically our nominee, yet no one pays attention to him or gives a # about him except our beloved mainstream media, who constantly pounds the name Romney into our heads. Gee I wonder why that is, they must like him out of the goodness of their hearts and his politics huh?

You talk about people getting paid to publish a news article? Just how, exactly, do you think Mitt Romney ended up with any support at all. He got by on his looks? Give me a break, the only reason Ron Paul isn't unanimously supported is because his organization DOESN'T bribe anyone.
edit on 29-4-2012 by RSF77 because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul Won (Great Read) - Huffington Post
  Posted 13 days ago with 127 member flags
Texas GOP Mutiny - SC, VA, LA and Others May Join
  Posted 15 days ago with 83 member flags
A Common Man\'s Guide to the Federal Budget.
  Posted 3 days ago with 51 member flags
*VID* Ron Paul delegates speak out from RNC.
  Posted 8 days ago with 39 member flags