It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Turq1
Nothing he said was really that shocking besides saying "bull#". He could have said "nonsense" but it'd still have the same effect.
All he was pointing out in effect was, "Hey Christian girls, how is it right that you don't have to be a virgin on your wedding night while gays can't have sex at all?"
Like he said, they ignore the stuff that is inconvenient to their "modern life" but hold others to a standard back 2000 or so years ago, whether or not they believe. I'm sure they know the double standard which they'd rather not know about.
Originally posted by jimmyx
Originally posted by graphuto
Originally posted by jimmyx
i guess it's alright if your son was called a "f-in" faggot by christians, or beat up, or tied to a barb-wired fence and left to die...those things have happened...but woah!! don't insult the christian faith, that would make you furious.
Irrelevant to the current situation. Of course it wouldn't be all right if her son was called a "f-in" faggot by Christians, or beat up, or tied to a barb-wired fence and left to die. According to Jesus, we know them by their fruits. If people are doing this, they just clearly aren't Christian, no matter what they say, and can be written off as such, leaving no foul mark against real Christians.
So, you're trying to illicit some sort of similar response from the people here, but you don't even understand what you're saying. Fail.edit on 28-4-2012 by graphuto because: (no reason given)
please study the "dark ages" in europe, christians tortured and killed non-believers for centuries...or how early god-fearing and religous zealots in the early days of america burned "witches", flogged and tortured "sinners" in the new colonies...and...THE PEOPLE THAT DID THIS WERE CLEARLY CHRISTIAN!!!
Originally posted by Danbones
reply to post by graphuto
The christians in the OP took offence to the victim and the exposer of christian gay bullying
instead of dealing with the so called fake christians that do it
so again another proof your arguement is a non contender
Originally posted by AshleyD
Regardless of what each of our opinions may be (and they will obviously differ), the moral of the story is when you are the spokesman for a cause, you need to be above reproach in your behavior.
This man was nothing of the sort. If you are for or against the students that walked out, he still should not have resorted to insulting them (even if you considered it not that bad). If you are a figurehead for an anti-bullying campaign, you should not do such things yourself.
You should be a model of what your campaign is.
Originally posted by Turq1
reply to post by Eurisko2012
Pointing out a double standard to a less-than-bright person isn't an attack, as much as it might feel like that to the person on the receiving end.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Originally posted by Turq1
reply to post by Eurisko2012
Pointing out a double standard to a less-than-bright person isn't an attack, as much as it might feel like that to the person on the receiving end.
Calling teenagers names as they flee the scene of an ambush is immature and hateful.
Dan Savage attacked / ambushed the Christian high school students because Christians
are against gay marriage.
--------
BTW, do you really think Dan Savage helped the Pro Gay Marriage effort?
Originally posted by Turq1
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Originally posted by Turq1
reply to post by Eurisko2012
Pointing out a double standard to a less-than-bright person isn't an attack, as much as it might feel like that to the person on the receiving end.
Calling teenagers names as they flee the scene of an ambush is immature and hateful.
Dan Savage attacked / ambushed the Christian high school students because Christians
are against gay marriage.
--------
BTW, do you really think Dan Savage helped the Pro Gay Marriage effort?
They walked out before he even got to that part. The problem is they felt it was an attack on Christianity, when he was pointing out Christians don't follow all parts of the Bible as well, which is a fair assessment.
Originally posted by technical difficulties
The only actual problem was his language (which he seems to use everywhere he goes). Everything else he said was spot on. People ignore a lot of stuff in the bible that is wrong, and yet still follow the homophobic verses. He wouldn't be criticizing the bible if people did use it as an excuse to hate gay people (which I wouldn't be surprised if some of the people calling him a bully did).
Originally posted by RandomEsotericScreenname
reply to post by longjohnbritches
Thanks for proving my point. Intolerance after a little bit of well founded criticism and an honest observation.
Where did I say I am anti Christian? Just told it like I saw it. Were Christians not walking out after the first word of criticism because they would not tolerate it?
And anti American, where did you get that from?
This is funny, I just made an observation and you are already showing your intolerance and try to demonize me.
That's pathetic.
edit on 28-4-2012 by RandomEsotericScreenname because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sippy Cup
reply to post by RandomEsotericScreenname
Criticism?????? Ummm no he called the bible BULLSH**
He could’ve made his point in a respectful professional way, but his own hate and “intolerance” of a book which has views opposite his! So he made a very offensive and rude comment.
In my opinion he just wanted to attack with a quick stab anybody who believes being gay is bad and unnatural!
He wants people to be tolerant of his way of life , but he cant be tolerant of other peoples beliefs?