It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This year, EH11 will continue with the EH10 scenario, an improvised explosive device (nuclear) exploded in the Midwest.
Threats to other regions of the country will prompt transfers of leadership, authorities, and relocations to alternate facilities in order to continue business operations.
Then, from the notes section - you read this: The current plan is for the Washington Office is to transfer leadership and relocate key Executive Leadership Team members to the Office of Fire and Aviation during a sudden or expected incident.
Next slide:
This process is called “devolution”, the transfer of statutory authorities and facilities in order to continue business operations.
From another slide:
Mission Essential Functions
The Mission Essential Functions of oil, gas, and mineral operations, payments and royalties will receive emphasis during EH11.
Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by thehoneycomb
It would be very intersting to really get the bottom of just who
is leading in the Occupy Movement. I would wager a bet that
it has been infiltrated, and is being used.
That is very scary, as many in Occupy are young, and not well
informed on just how Agent Provacatuers work inside movements like this.
Some may wonder why Democrats or groups closely affiliated with the Democrats like MoveOn, Campaign for America’s Future, Rebuild the Dream or unions like SEIU would want to infiltrate the Occupy (note: individuals who are Democrats, union, MoveOn or members of other groups are not the same as the leadership). Essentially, leaders of these groups see Occupy as the Democrats’ potential answer to the Tea Party. Occupiers do not see themselves that way, but these groups want the Occupy to adopt their strategy of working within the Democratic Party. In one example, Eric Lottke, a senior policy analyst for SEIU who has been involved in Occupy DC, appeared on a radio show with two other occupiers from Occupy Washington, DC and Occupy Oakland. Lottke said he was speaking as an occupier from Occupy DC and talked about 'taking back Congress in 2012', the need for an electoral strategy and gave the usual Democrat rhetoric about Obama needing more time.
The two other guests said Lottke was completely out of step with most Occupiers who say we should not focus on electoral politics but instead should build an independent movement to challenge the corrupt system. We doubt the Occupy DC General Assembly agreed with Lottke’s pro-Democratic Party, pro-Obama views but Lottke had positioned himself to speak for them. Van Jones of Rebuild the Dream similarly was appearing in the media as if he were an occupy spokesperson claiming there will be 2000 “99% candidates” in 2012; again trying to push Occupy into Democratic electoral politics. These are just two examples of many Democratic Party operatives trying to send Occupy into Democratic Party politics despite the movement consistently describing itself as independent and non-electoral. www.globalresearch.ca...
edit on 26-4-2012 by burntheships because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by thehoneycomb
Yes, what is scary and sad is that many are getting sucked into this through
Occupy, and Occupy is obviously fed from one hand and monitered from the other.
So, that speaks volumes to me,its as if...like they want this to happen.edit on 26-4-2012 by burntheships because: (no reason given)