Originally posted by DrEugeneFixer
Originally posted by FenderWolf
What is some sure fire way I can convince them?
Get a Phd in structural engineering and with a focus in dynamic modelling of unstable structures, and then show them your doctoral thesis.![]()
Get the PhD structural engineer to explain why accurate data on the distributions of steel and concrete down the building are not important.
Structural engineering is thousands of years old. It is just in the last 150 years the enough steel could be produced in quantity to use for skyscrapers. So our experts have the problem of pretending that something which is not too complicated it SO COMPLICATED that we need experts to tell us what to think about it.
So we have an Intellectual Imperialism problem and ultimately that is more important than any conspiracy.
300 year old Newtonian physics is different for PhD structural engineers than it is for 8th graders. Like they can't do the calculation for the conservation of momentum. Of course they will now look like fools if they admit airliners could not have done it.
psik


People are weird sometimes, they gain evidence for debate but I can show them where
my research came from. It helps when the news releases newly found research about two weeks to a month after I have told them about it.
I'm
mostly only weeks to months ahead of release but at times I have been over three years ahead of release. I found that to mention things in a way that
stirs their desire to research things on their own it helps.