It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Against that are the clear requirements for righteousness in order to stand justified.
Aorist Verbs FTW!!!
What other kind of grace is there? Free Grace is like saying Flaming Fire.
en.wikipedia.org...
Free Grace theology is a soteriological view within Protestantism teaching that everyone receives eternal life the moment they believe in Jesus Christ as their personal Savior and Lord.
Ephesians 2:8-9 (AMP)
Works are the fruit, as I recall. Is there something I am missing?
No, those are fruits of Justification, and the lack thereof is a proof that the faith one claims to have is dead.
Don't forget Christ entered into the new covenant at the last supper the night before His crucifixion.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by jmdewey60
What is the Greek name of the "perfect" tense? What does the perfect tense imply?
Thats what the AORIST tense is, the "perfect" indicitive.
edit on 21-4-2012 by NOTurTypical because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Works are the fruit, as I recall. Is there something I am missing?
No, those are fruits of Justification, and the lack thereof is a proof that the faith one claims to have is dead.
What I was talking about, that the quote above was a reply to, is my understanding (which I did not elaborate on) that the requirement for justification is righteousness. You seem to have it backwards, which is that justification produces fruit of righteousness, which to me seems to be a contradiction of what justification is.
Maybe a better description of what is going on is that there are people who, through the agency of Jesus and the holy Spirit, have by faith a form of salvation, meaning they believe there is a salvation out there and believe they can attain it, though behind this is the understanding that there are things involved before it is realized. In the process of attaining this goal, salvation, they have the Holy Spirit active inside them to where they behave a certain way, doing certain acts or deeds, which God finds acceptable.
For the sake of argument, let's say a person in this condition just described dies, for whatever reason, and goes to judgment. This condition of righteousness, as discernible through these good deeds, allow this person to be declared in the form of a verdict of this judgment, to be justified. At this point, the subject of this example has moved from the condition of having a hypothetical salvation which he believed he could have, through faith, to a condition of having his faith realized and being saved in reality.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Don't forget Christ entered into the new covenant at the last supper the night before His crucifixion.
It does not say anything of the sort.
What do you mean by "entered in"? Do you mean he entered into an agreement? An agreement with who? And why is it at that moment?
I don't see this as anything other than a declaration before the crucifixion, that his death was serving a purpose, and it was God's will that it be done. What Jesus was instituting at the Last Supper was a method of keeping in mind his personal sacrifice towards the bringing about of a way to salvation. A "New Covenant" is a figurative way to describe the new system of salvation, by recalling what existed earlier with Moses, and what was being replaced.
You're mixing metaphors until they make no sense.
Dont know how much gardening you've done but you cant grow fruit unless you're first connected to the vine. You dont grow fruit so that you can hope to be connected to the vine.
Christ says so Himself in the last supper narriative in Matthew.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Christ says so Himself in the last supper narriative in Matthew.
Maybe not everyone is a prophet like you claim to be (along with being a perfected saint), so it would be helpful to us mortals if you could explain it.edit on 21-4-2012 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
You're mixing metaphors until they make no sense.
Dont know how much gardening you've done but you cant grow fruit unless you're first connected to the vine. You dont grow fruit so that you can hope to be connected to the vine.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
I'm not giving Greek lessons.
www.ntgreek.org...
Aorist Tense
The aorist is said to be "simple occurrence" or "summary occurrence", without regard for the amount of time taken to accomplish the action.
Perfect Tense
The basic thought of the perfect tense is that the progress of an action has been completed and the results of the action are continuing on, in full effect. In other words, the progress of the action has reached its culmination and the finished results are now in existence. Unlike the English perfect, which indicates a completed past action, the Greek perfect tense indicates the continuation and present state of a completed past action.
en.wikipedia.org...
Verbs are conjugated in four main combinations of tense and aspect (present, future, perfect, and aorist)