posted on Apr, 5 2012 @ 01:00 PM
AbecedarinA single Olympc-size swimming pool has a volume of approximately 2500 cubic meters thus contains 2500 tonnes of water
(approximately), or around 5 times more water than what was leaked.
Don’t you mean 2500 divide 12 tonnes? Which = 208.33 times more than was actually leaked.
Is not the volume (or indeed tonnage) of radioactive water leaked, but how radioactive it was, and even more importantly what volume solid particles
were dispersed in it, and how long their half-life is (the longer the half-life the longer enduring the environmental problem).
StirlingNo YOU are guilty.....Tepco is guilty, but i feel no guilt.
I have been arguing for the removal and shut down of atomic power for the whole time its been in use......
But nobody would ever listen...
And if you had your way there would be billions more tonnes of CO2 in the atmosphere by from fossil fuel burning. More mercury in the ocean as a
direct result, radiation from coal (in the soil) and more overall deaths as a result.
You might imagine that you’d just stick with solar panels, but then your electricity would be so expensive, any industry or business in your nation
requiring large amounts of electricity, would be financially compelled to relocate abroad. Even Germany (which has been spending spends tens of
billions on solar, and has more than America) is struggling to produce more than 3 percent of its electricity needs.
The fact you campaign against all nuclear (and by extension the safe, human error free, reactors, like the Pebble Bed Reactor) suggests you are either
fanatical or totally ignorant of the subject -of all perhaps the risks (just like most people who totally oppose nuclear).