It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by GLontra
I have noticed that the response you posted above is becoming your standard response when people will not agree with you.
All i would say to you is relax chief, do not get so stressed.
Originally posted by GLontra
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by GLontra
I have noticed that the response you posted above is becoming your standard response when people will not agree with you.
All i would say to you is relax chief, do not get so stressed.
In fact, this is exactly what I want to do: relax, and don't get stressed anymore.
If I keep trying to convince people who simply won't be convinced by anything, I will only get more and more stressed, with no results in the end.
So, it's not worth the effort. It's better to relax, and adopt a "Time will tell" approach...
Even moreso, who are you to say what predictions are legitimately discovered via information and/or cognitive feeling. You aren't. Period.
Sometimes they are just right.
Sometimes people predict something BEFORE it happens and *gasp* it happens!
Well then I am glad that most predictions aren't as vague as your example. I'm pretty sure the odds of guessing a 7.2 earthquake to a 48 hour period are significantly smaller. Once again, statistics class.
But what you fail to realize is that here, on this fine thing we call the internet, there is next to no way to differentiate precognition with coincidence.
But in your list that you provided you continue to do EXACTLY what I said. You give the possibility, as slim as it may be in the eyes of some people, that a prediction is REAL - 0%. You don't even give it the light of day.
Is it because you have already made up your mind? Do you feel that because you are incapable of prediction that no one else is either?
Just because someone does not share their methods of prediction with YOU does not mean they didn't use science or logical thought to reach that conclusion, but the moment a prediction comes up people all of a sudden feel entitled to know how and why or else all credibility is lost.
Did I also mention that skeptics seem to have en enormous ego? We are discovering new objects in this universe literally every day, many within our very solar system, some that are on projected paths very close to Earth that we have never, ever known about in the past. But somehow, using the almighty powers of "skepticism", you are able to prove a negative with 100% certainty. You should honestly be up for a noble prize.
EXCUSE AFTER EXCUSE AFTER EXCUSE. Your comment on floods makes absolutely no sense.
My entire state was flooded this past year. Did that happen in recorded history? Nope.
You seem to be able to prove stuff with 100% certainty, so take a stab at that one.
Record events are "records" for a reason. It means it didn't happen. Ever. In recorded history.
Volcanic power is indeed increasing. The amount of damaging and newsworthy eruptions in 2010 and 2011 as compared to the past is a staggering statistic to say the least.
Yep, it is not the end of the world. That is one of the major hoaxes. I only listen to scholars, not skeptics. I hate how people treat the ancients like they were idiots, they were most certainly not.
Originally posted by boncho
Where was the prediction that Japan would suffer one of the worst Nuclear disasters in history?