Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Our Entire Space Program Is A Hoax And A Massive Deception

page: 122
57
<< 119  120  121    123  124  125 >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 08:45 PM
link   
edit on 12-8-2012 by alien because: (no reason given)




posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 08:49 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 31 2012 @ 12:13 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 31 2012 @ 05:23 AM
link   
reply to post by gaymarriage
 



The more significant issue is the picture taking issue of course. A photo take AFTER the contingency collection would have been expected to show MISSING ROCKS, COLLECTED ROCKS. But they take the pics first, and so the contingency sample cannot be corroborated by a photo which shows the rocks to be removed from the field of interest. The whole thing is very fake. SUPER FAKE.


As usual, your reasoning is skewed 180 degrees. Samples are documented by photographing them in situ, before they are collected. Oh, and stop talking to yourself.



posted on Aug, 1 2012 @ 12:17 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 6 2012 @ 09:04 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 6 2012 @ 12:04 PM
link   
edit on 12-8-2012 by alien because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 8 2012 @ 11:21 AM
link   
Could the waltons i.e decisively and his sock puppet of waltons please refrain from
Posting absouloute drivel and stomping about .. Night jim bob



posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 04:11 AM
link   
edit on 12-8-2012 by alien because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 04:18 AM
link   







posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 05:02 AM
link   
reply to post by lisablues
 



The most significant development with respect to recent "Apollo Con Revelations" has to do without question with our new and very clear understanding of why the astronauts, even going back to Shepard in his first Mercury flight, lied about star sightings. ICBM guidance and navigation was and is dependent on sightings. If Armstrong could not see stars in cislunar space, then we would not be prompted to think of an ICBM's need to see stars from the missile's incomplete orbit in order to find its target.

The astronauts tell the tale that they had trouble seeing stars so the ICBM guidance and navigation issue would not be called to mind. The astronauts did not deny stars altogether, but effectively discounted them, marginalized them.


Read the transcripts of the Mercury flights. They spent a lot of time spotting planets and navigational stars. I genuinely don't understand your point.



posted on Aug, 10 2012 @ 07:46 AM
link   
reply to post by blocula
 


blog.trutv.com...

I'd say this pretty much concludes this conspiracy.
Face it, humans are pretty awesome

We went to the moon and it was sweet
edit on 11-8-2012 by alien because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2012 @ 09:56 AM
link   
NASA's engineers:

"Oops, we lost the original moon landing footage"



Read me at "Curiosity has not landed, but Is Good Entertainment For The TV Brain Washed Masses".

My point of view about moon landing hoax is completely new.

Thank you



posted on Aug, 11 2012 @ 10:11 AM
link   
reply to post by SkepticGuy
 



NASA's engineers:

"Oops, we lost the original moon landing footage"


As I said to your trolling on another thread: where did they say that?



posted on Aug, 11 2012 @ 10:46 AM
link   
I am sick to death of charlatans using ATS as an advertisement site !
In order to distort the truth by posting months of garbage then to sway people away
from this site and onto other forums etc..

We went to the moon sock puppets of doc
I urge you all to stay on this site its free fun and safe..



posted on Aug, 11 2012 @ 08:33 PM
link   
edit on 12-8-2012 by alien because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2012 @ 08:40 PM
link   
edit on 12-8-2012 by alien because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2012 @ 09:32 PM
link   
Stars become less visible the higher you go. They proved that with Gemini 11, they used UV photography to see stars from about 140 Km altitude. Outside of the ionosphere you need a star tracker camera, and they are only made by the Naval Research Labs, or Le Officine Galileo, whos board of directors is heavily loaded with Military and Defence industry members. The Optical Physics Company also has some gear, but they are connected to the military too. I'd think the star trackers are carefully controlled as the ICBMs use them. The generation 3 units are down in cost to about $50,000 now, for the lower end models, still probably $200,000 for the top end. So what's in them for that price? And would they sell you one?



posted on Aug, 11 2012 @ 10:17 PM
link   
edit on 12-8-2012 by alien because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2012 @ 11:00 PM
link   
edit on 12-8-2012 by alien because: (no reason given)





new topics

top topics



 
57
<< 119  120  121    123  124  125 >>

log in

join