Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Our Entire Space Program Is A Hoax And A Massive Deception

page: 125
57
<< 122  123  124    126  127 >>

log in

join

posted on Aug, 16 2012 @ 01:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by r2d246
....Passing the van allen belt they'd be bombarded by many many many different kinds of radiation coming from multiple sources.

Well anyway JUST DO YOUR RESEARCH.




Originally posted by denver22
To reach the Moon astronauts would have to travel through the Van Allen Radiation Belts, resulting in lethal doses of radiation. Answer is...down below r2d246



This is a claim the hoax advocates often make, but it is a gross exaggeration and simply not supported by the data. Radiation was a definite concern for NASA before the first space flights, but they invested a great deal of research into it and determined the hazard was minimal. It took Apollo only about an hour to pass through the worst part of the radiation belts - once on the outbound trip and once again on the return trip. The total radiation dose received by the astronauts was about one rem. A person will experience radiation sickness with a dose of 100-200 rem, and death with a dose of 300+ rem. Clearly the doses received fall well below anything that could be considered a significant risk. Despite claims that "lead shielding meters thick would have been needed", NASA found it unnecessary to provide any special radiation shielding.

The hoax advocates also make the mistake of limiting themselves to two-dimensional thinking. The Van Allen Radiation Belts consist of a doughnut-shaped region centered on Earth's magnetic equator. The translunar trajectories followed by the Apollo spacecraft were typically inclined about 30 degrees to Earth's equator, therefore Apollo bypassed all but the edges of the radiation belts, greatly reducing the exposure.

For more information, please see The Van Allen Belts and Travel to the Moon and Radiation Plan for the Apollo Lunar Mission.



Intense radiation from solar flares would have killed the Apollo astronauts in route to the Moon and back.


Solar flares were a NASA concern as well, but the radiation doses claimed by the hoax advocates are again greatly exaggerated and unsubstantiated. Although low-intensity solar flares are common, they posed no real threat to the astronauts. High-intensity solar flares could have endangered the astronauts' health, but these large eruptions are infrequent. Furthermore, there are statistical methods for determining the likelihood of a major flare during a given time interval. If NASA found an unacceptably high probability for a solar flare event during a scheduled flight, the mission would have been postponed. No large solar flares occurred during the Apollo missions and typical radiation doses received by the astronauts was very low.

For more information, please see Radiation Plan for the Apollo Lunar Mission



In addition to exposure to deadly radiation, the Apollo astronauts would have been pierced by thousands of micrometeoroids.

Shielding was provided to protect the Apollo astronauts from micrometeoroid bombardment. Due to their low mass, only a thin layer of material was necessary to stop these dust-sized particles. For example, the Lunar Module was protected by a thin aluminum outer shield a few thousandths of an inch thick. In addition, the astronauts' spacesuits included a micrometeoroid garment to protect them while performing activities on the lunar surface.

Here is some research for you but feel free to do some of your
own before you post like that telling us experts to do some research lmao
edit on 16-8-2012 by denver22 because: (no reason given)
edit on 16-8-2012 by denver22 because: (no reason given)




posted on Aug, 16 2012 @ 02:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by r2d246
Anyone who does enough research generally comes to the conclusion that they did NOT GO THE MOON.

....They say there computers were powerful enough. That's garbage. They did some tests and realized the kind of computers you'd need to facilitate such an endevor were not available at that time.





The Apollo guidance computer had the equivalent computing power of today's kitchen appliances, far less than that required to go to the Moon.


Unlike general-purpose computers, the Apollo guidance computer had to perform only one task - guidance. Most of the number crunching was performed at Mission Control on several mainframe computers. The results were then transmitted to the onboard computer, which acted upon them. The Apollo guidance computer was capable of computing only a small number of navigation problems itself. Since the guidance computer had to run only one program, that program could be put in ROM, thus only a small amount of RAM was required to hold the temporary results of guidance calculations.

The hoax advocates tend to overrate the tasks performed by the onboard guidance computers of the 1960's. In fact, the Mercury spacecraft, 1961-63, flew into space without any onboard computer whatsoever, yet the trajectories were precisely controlled and the capsule was capable of fully automated control.



The computer technology did not exist in the 1960's to build the Apollo guidance computer.


Computer companies of the 1960's had to produce general-purpose computers at a cost that would attract consumers. NASA, on the other hand, required a computer capable of performing only a single task - guidance - and could easily afford a custom designed and built system using cutting edge components and techniques. Although modern microprocessors did not yet exist, microchips performing simple tasks were available in the early 1960's, and these could be built-up into computer processors. By the mid-1960's several companies were producing commercially available integrated circuits.

The hoax advocates often become trapped into a single way of thinking. Just because one technology is used to solve a particular problem today does not mean that problem was unsolvable before the technology was available. Man is much more creative than the hoax advocates are willing to acknowledge.



The astronauts' movement inside the Lunar Module would change the center of mass, throwing the LM off balance, and making it impossible to control.


This is the claim of hoax advocate and Ralph Rene who, apparently, has a poor understanding of physics and the Lunar Module's control systems. The LM had an automatic computer guidance and inertial control system. This system was designed to measure the attitude of the LM several times per second using a system of gyroscopes. If it found that the LM was out of proper attitude it would make adjustments by gimballing the main descent engine and/or throttling it back, and firing control thrusters as needed to stabilize the spacecraft. Despite claims to the contrary, the control thrusters exerted sufficient force to nudge the spacecraft around as necessary to keep it stable.

P.S r2d2462: Do not put your faith in charlatans and con artists when all you
have to do is do some simple : RESEARCH as you put it..
edit on 16-8-2012 by denver22 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 16 2012 @ 02:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by r2d246
Anyone who does enough research generally comes to the conclusion that they did NOT GO THE MOON.



No - no -no Anyone who does enough research will see that putting your faith
in con artists makes you realize after doing some simple research
You too will realize that we WENT TO THE MOON..



posted on Aug, 16 2012 @ 03:18 PM
link   
I also want to talk about pictures:

Amazing things happen at NASA.

The genial swindlers and piss artists that work for NASA have attached “Mighty Eagle”, the rocket they have built in 2011, able to land backwards, to a tree like children do at Christmas.



Use resolution 800 x 600 (under the image to the right). This impotent, ineffective, unconvincing, weak “Mighty Eagle” is just attached to a tree.

It is not a flying test, it is another buffoonery


Look at this image:



The piss artists that work for NASA have invented Comet Tempel 1, hit in the right eye, with the face of an animal.
Can you see in the image the nose, the left eye, the nostrils of the bad animal?

Absurd, asinine, ludicrous, mad, meaningless, mindless, moronic, nonsensical, pointless, ridiculous, silly, simple, stupid, unintelligent, unreasonable PISS ARTISTS WORK FOR NASA.

In 2011 they tested Mighty Eagle, wow, but to land Curiosity they used this rocket designed by PISS ARTISTS:



If they already have the Super Technology of Curiosity Lander, why in 2011 are testing the ridiculous Mighty Eagle?

In 1976 NASA landed the first probe to Mars: WIKING.
Here is WIKING in the scenario they are using still now to take pictures of Mars.



Look at the picture: Wiking on the left is like a hippopotamus, on the right it is like a grasshopper. That man Carl Sagan is another buffoon.

[snip]

edit on 16-8-2012 by elevatedone because: removed insulting comment.



posted on Aug, 16 2012 @ 04:14 PM
link   
reply to post by SkepticGuy
 


Another open mind I see. Oh wait, perhaps not. (Sigh) Try doing some research that's not on the wackier parts of the internet please?



posted on Aug, 16 2012 @ 04:15 PM
link   
reply to post by SkepticGuy
 



Piss artists, stop pissing about.
WE NOT ALL ARE GULLIBLE PEOPLE.


Do you have anything to contribute to the debate besides your low opinion of people with higher education?



posted on Aug, 16 2012 @ 06:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by blocula
Heaters,that ran for over 30 years? off of batteries? that ran for over 30 years? somethings definitely really wrong here...


Very true, and what is wrong is your inability to do even a little bit of research, your lack of basic scientific knowledge and your ability to believe any nonsense you read!



posted on Aug, 16 2012 @ 07:16 PM
link   
Where is blocualr anyway doing research perhaps?



posted on Aug, 16 2012 @ 08:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticGuy
I also want to talk about pictures:


Why do you ignore the video?
www.nasa.gov...




Use resolution 800 x 600 (under the image to the right). This impotent, ineffective, unconvincing, weak “Mighty Eagle” is just attached to a tree.

It is not a flying test,


Oh dear, in your "research" you missed the video - you realise how silly you look now!


jra

posted on Aug, 17 2012 @ 03:42 AM
link   
reply to post by SkepticGuy
 


I knew I recognized these ridiculous claims. Welcome back bigbrain. I see you've learned nothing during your 5 year absence. You still believe rockets can't land vertically and comet temple 1 is an animal's head?

P.S. What the heck is a "piss artist" anyway?



posted on Aug, 17 2012 @ 02:10 PM
link   
Mighty Eagle flight test has been made a few days ago:

www.youtube.com...
What an incredible, astonishing thing!


What a height, what a speed!

Dear NASA's engineers, before Mighty Eagle, you have built this powerful rocket to land Curiosity:

scroll down!

That rocket has been able to land Curiosity, to slow down velocity from 360 km/h to 0 km/h, has four rocket
engines for a great stability, has a fast and powerful computer able to keep the rocket horizontal.
You could drop it from a helicopter above a football field and it would be able to land in the center. It would be able to amaze all the spectators. You would have a great credibility.

But instead it doesn't exist. We can see it in an artistic fake, unreal image.
Haven't you built a mock-up of the lander to test it in flight dropping it from a helicopter?
Where are the pictures and flight test videos?

Why, NASA's buffoons, you show a pathetic, shameful test flight of Mighty Eagle instead to show ??? (but that powerful rocket has not even a name) Flying Crane Eagle (do you like the name?)?

That rocket has not even a name, images do not exist, videos have been lost (as the Snoopy flight tests at Langley Crane). What must we think?

That all the Curiosity mission is another buffooooonery.

edit on 17-8-2012 by SkepticGuy because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 17 2012 @ 03:24 PM
link   
reply to post by SkepticGuy
 


I'm sorry, I was distracted by some facts just now, bad of me I know. Do you have a point, or are you just rolling out a number of disconnected facts in the hope that some of them might line up in a roughly straight line?



posted on Aug, 17 2012 @ 03:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by jra
[P.S. What the heck is a "piss artist" anyway?


I think the correct translation is: "A bullsh*t artist"



posted on Aug, 17 2012 @ 06:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticGuy
videos have been lost (as the Snoopy flight tests at Langley Crane).

You mean the video I found and uploaded 4 years ago when you came completely unhinged and got yourself banned?



posted on Aug, 18 2012 @ 09:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by ngchunter

Originally posted by SkepticGuy
videos have been lost (as the Snoopy flight tests at Langley Crane).

You mean the video I found and uploaded 4 years ago when you came completely unhinged and got yourself banned?

You have built this rocket to land on the moon:



and instead you test the rocket of the video that is not the mock-up of Snoopy.

I think it isn't a good idea. Snoopy had a powerful shaking rocket engine at the bottom and four thrusters used to gain stability. If you test another rocket without this system, you are a little wrong.

Another insignificant remark: if you are testing the rocket to verify if it is able to land like a helicopter, flying in vertical attitude, perhaps you should not hold it suspended with cables.



With cables also a man can fly.





edit on 18-8-2012 by SkepticGuy because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 19 2012 @ 10:24 AM
link   
In 2007 and 2008, NASA's enginneers said:

"During recent tests at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala., the lander test article was suspended up 10.5 feet from the landing pad. After being released from its hoist, the lander simultaneously received a command to activate its onboard thrusters to carry it to a controlled landing using a preprogrammed descent profile".

This is the video:

www.youtube.com...

What a ridiculous, absurd, comical, contemptible, derisory, farcical, foolish, funny, hilarious, inane, incredible, laughable, ludicrous, nonsensical, outrageous, preposterous, risible, silly, stupid, unbelievable, zany flight test.

Dear NASA's engineers, in 2012, a few days ago, would you have been able to do this?

www.youtube.com...

Say the truth: you are only good actors, you have not the science and technology to build Flying Crane Eagle:



You are like children that play with LEGO:

scroll down!

and you fantasize that you have sent that powerful Flying Crane Eagle on Mars to land Curiosity:

www.pbs.org...
Look at that NASA's actor on the left. It is looking at some screen. But on Mars there isn't the CNN.
Ah, ah, ah.

You are swindling all the world from 1969. 43 years !!!

edit on 19-8-2012 by SkepticGuy because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 19 2012 @ 11:21 AM
link   
Oh hello ScepticGuy. Don't you ever get tired trying to persuade people that down is in fact up, or that red is green, or whatever? Well, it's your life. (Yawns and wanders off)



posted on Aug, 19 2012 @ 03:22 PM
link   
error
edit on 19-8-2012 by SkepticGuy because: (no reason given)


jra

posted on Aug, 19 2012 @ 04:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticGuy
Instead NASA's buffoons have said that Flying Crane Eagle + Curiosity have travelled to Mars at velocity of 21,000 km/h


Relative to what?

Spacecraft speeds are measured relative to another object, be it the Sun the Earth or to the missions destination, in this case Mars. The speeds will be different for each, so which one is it?

Here's what I found for the 26th of March, 2012, during MSL's second Course Correction Maneuver:

From: Spaceflight 101

As of 22:00 GMT on March 26, MSL had completed 309.2 Million Kilometers of its 567-Million Kilometer Journey to Mars (192.1 Million Miles of 352 Million Miles total). Relative to its reference point in the Solar System, the Sun, the Spacecraft was traveling at a relative velocity of 90,922kph (56,496mph). Now cruising at a Distance of 4 Light-Minutes to Earth, MSL is speeding at a relative Velocity of 52,273 Kilometers per Hour (32,481mph). 4 Light-Minutes translates to 71.84 Million Kilometers and 44.64 Million Miles. At 22:00 GMT on Monday, the Spacecraft was ‘only’ 3.05 Light Minutes or 54.85 Million Kilometers (34.1 Million Miles) from Mars moving at a relative velocity of 30,150 Kilometers per Hour (18,734 Miles per Hour). With the mission on track and all spacecraft systems in pristine condition, everything is on track for landing on August 6 (GMT).


So that's 90,922km/h relative to the Sun, 52,273 km/h relative to the Earth and 30,150km/h relative to Mars.



posted on Aug, 19 2012 @ 06:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticGuy

What a ridiculous, absurd, comical, contemptible, derisory, farcical, foolish, funny, hilarious, inane, incredible, laughable, ludicrous, nonsensical, outrageous, preposterous, risible, silly, stupid,


Just like your claims, I didn't realize they had broadband in asylums ..
You guys get spoilt too much.






top topics



 
57
<< 122  123  124    126  127 >>

log in

join