Q1.Are Masons leaving the banks? Do they have to? What have THEY done with our money!!!?
Q2.Are Jews leaving and are Muslims involved, (because all I know about them are their usury free banks)?
Q3. If this was a real Free Mason thread, I'd like to know what Asia means to you?
I do not know if its the Masons leaving the banks, i wouldnt be surprised if some where Masonic members...
I cannot say if the Jews leaving the banks has to do with Muslims, but personally i'd be looking a little closer at involvement from Zionist's. "They" control the banking system, "they" control the mainstream media, "tehy" control most of the western worlds government and military, so i guess "they" would be the ones i'd be looking into first ?
I don't understand what you mean by "if this was a real Free Mason thread"
From what i've learnt about Free Masons and the world i live in is that quite a lot [not all] of the upper levels of Mason's seem to either hold, or go into positions of high authority or esteem. I personally don't believe the lower levels are involved, but are more or less used as a "grooming process" to see who can best serve the interests of the upper levels, those that arent chosen go on with business as normal. And i believe there are secret societies withing the secret society, meaning that not all in the upper levels are involved, but those that are have their own agends that may not be in the same interest of all levels involved.
Originally posted by guavas
Most people are totally unaware of what you can do with a square, compass and plum line.
I didn't call you a liar. I simply implied that you might be a delusional idiot who accepts the premise of a Dan Brown novel as a statement of fact. You've done nothing so far to improve your case…
Originally posted by Evanzsayz
Didn't think so? Why so eager to make me out to be a liar...wow I love how your so ready to judge.
Originally posted by Pinocchio
I am so glad that they have their own country.
Originally posted by squandered
reply to post by AussieDingus
I was baiting for an answer with other parts of my comment but these three questions are serious.
Then i guess i took the bait !
They act as a group, within the banking culture. What you say about Jews applies the same way exactly. This is why I posted the question. It is equally important to watch the free masons exit the banks, but obviously much harder to prove. None the less, it would be common knowledge amongst executive circles what their exact stance is.
But thats what i'm refering to because unless we are in those exectutive circles we can only speculate or guess ? And all groups seem to have inner groups within the group. And those inner groups, or societies, or gangs, or whatever we want to call it, are the ones that really know and the rest of the group is used to meet the inner groups agenda !
I references jews and muslims only as hierarchies. I hear about Sharia banking from time to time. Ironically, it's much more fair. I don't care. It's all ideology mixed up in wrong thinking. A lot of money is being sucked out of the system and I don't want to pick them apart.
I used the Federal Reserve example because any country that hasnt signed over to it is either being invaded, about to be invaded, or the next in line to be invaded. And the list is getting very small with only a few countries left that havent signed over. And i think we all know the Zionist's run the Federal Reserve ?
The OP is trying to give masonry friendly publicity as far as I can make out. I don't care for silly rules. The people representing masonry have attacked naysayers IN THIS THREAD. Maybe I referenced them too poetically. I don't really see these foot soldiers as particularly harmful, but I could never support a hierarchy that is secretive. aren't the blessing we have already enough? Why do they need operate within the system, and why should I care a white about people who operate exclusively to their own ends?
Just as Outlaw Motorcycle gangs involved in crime generate friendly publicity with their donations to childrens charities or doing "runs" and giving the proceeds to charities, while then operating behind the scenes in a completely different manner. Personally i dont buy innto the whole donating to charity as most donations get caught up in red tape or siphoned off through "admin costs". There are many charties here in Australia where the first 12 months of your 'donation" actually goes to the people working for the charity before any money reaches its supposed purpose.
Last but not least
This is what I mean. They in fact do hold positions of power.
What I hope to express most of all is that there is no higher power to submit to.
Robison describes a discourse delivered by Mirabeau at the Lodge des Chevaliers Bienfaisant at Paris. At the time (1770) Mirabeau was twenty years of age, the order of Chevaliers Bienfaisants didn't come into existence in Lyons until 1778 and although there was a Lodge Bienfaisance of the Strict Observence at Paris, it was not constituted until April 10, 1781.
Robison refers to the Grand Orient de la France as controlling all Freemasonry in France, although records show that both the legitimate Grand Lodge of France and the schismatic Grand Orient continued their separate existence after December 24, 1772. The Strict Observance Lodges were under their own Directories and only related to the Grand Orient by concordant, the oldest dating to 1776.
Barruel and Robison fail to provide any conclusive link between the Bavarian Illuminati and French Freemasonry, much less find a cause of the Revolution in Paris lodges. They display a great ignorance of the actual and documented workings of Freemasonry at the time, and, in support of their arguments, have made many demonstrably false statements.
Although both Barruel's and Robison's claims have been discredited, many, more contemporary, writers who rely on their books are still accepted as authorities.