It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Department of Defense's direct spending on Iraq totaled at least $757.8 billion, but also highlighting the complementary costs at home, such as interest paid on the funds borrowed to finance the wars and a potential nearly $1 trillion in extra spending to care for veterans returning from combat through 2050.
Originally posted by Britguy
Absolutely not!
So, what happens after more death and destruction? What happens when all the supposed bogeyman states have been bombed into submission? See, they'll just create more enemies, which they are already doing by installing hardline regimes in place of the ones we are supposedly deposing. It's a never ending cycle.
The industrial military machine is a beast that must be fed, as there is just too much profit at stake to let peace reign. If they can't find an enemy abroad, then they'll criminalise those at home and wage war on anyone who steps out of line, while telling us all it's to keep us all safe. It goes beyong paranoia, which it seems is a lame excuse, and is just an excuse to maintain the killing for profit.
In Israels case, they are state created through terrorism, who have expansionist policies and have enough clout through global banking and bought, bribed and quite possibly blackmailed politicians elsewhere to support them, no matter the cost in human life and destruction of the environment.
Originally posted by mayabong
reply to post by Krono
Didn't he say that he wants Israel wiped off the face of the Earth?
No he didn't, can you show me some proof?
Originally posted by pirhanna
Originally posted by mayabong
reply to post by Krono
Didn't he say that he wants Israel wiped off the face of the Earth?
No he didn't, can you show me some proof?
He actually said that the Israeli regime should be wiped off the face of the earth. Somewhat different, though still very aggressive. The difference though, is that is not a genocidal statement. The media twisted the translation, with intent it would seem.
No, of course I don't support another war to benefit the ultra wealthy.edit on 4-3-2012 by pirhanna because: (no reason given)
Would You Back A Military Strike On Iran?
Originally posted by stewiegriffin
reply to post by Krono
YES!!!
Hey Ahmadinejad. We're coming to get you man!
See what we did to your buddies Gaddafi and Hussein? Your next man!
Originally posted by mayabong
No he didn't, can you show me some proof?
Your translation is still wrong. Israel, nor wiped, nor face, nor earth was even said. lol
On October 26, 2005, IRIB News, an English-language subsidiary of the state-controlled Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), filed a story on Ahmadinejad's speech to the "World Without Zionism" conference in Asia, entitled: Ahmadinejad: Israel must be wiped off the map.[1] The story was picked up by Western news agencies and quickly made headlines around the world. On October 30, The New York Times published a full transcript of the speech in which Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying:
Our dear Imam (referring to Ayatollah Khomeini) said that the occupying regime must be wiped off the map and this was a very wise statement. We cannot compromise over the issue of Palestine. Is it possible to create a new front in the heart of an old front. This would be a defeat and whoever accepts the legitimacy of this regime has in fact, signed the defeat of the Islamic world. Our dear Imam targeted the heart of the world oppressor in his struggle, meaning the occupying regime. I have no doubt that the new wave that has started in Palestine, and we witness it in the Islamic world too, will eliminate this disgraceful stain from the Islamic world.[2]
Many news sources repeated the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting statement by Ahmadinejad that "Israel must be wiped off the map",[5][6] an English idiom which means to "cause a place to stop existing",[7] or to "obliterate totally",[8] or "destroy completely".[9]
Ahmadinejad's phrase was "بايد از صفحه روزگار محو شود" according to the text published on the President's Office's website.
The translation presented by the official Islamic Republic News Agency has been challenged by Arash Norouzi, who says the statement "wiped off the map" was never made and that Ahmadinejad did not refer to the nation or land mass of Israel, but to the "regime occupying Jerusalem". Norouzi translated the original Persian to English, with the result, "the Imam said this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time."[11] Juan Cole, a University of Michigan Professor of Modern Middle East and South Asian History, agrees that Ahmadinejad's statement should be translated as, "the Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e eshghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad).[12] According to Cole, "Ahmadinejad did not say he was going to 'wipe Israel off the map' because no such idiom exists in Persian." Instead, "he did say he hoped its regime, i.e., a Jewish-Zionist state occupying Jerusalem, would collapse."[13] The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) translated the phrase similarly, as "this regime" must be "eliminated from the pages of history."
Shiraz Dossa, a professor of Political Science at St. Francis Xavier University in Nova Scotia, Canada, also believes the text is a mistranslation
Ahmadinejad was quoting the Ayatollah Khomeini in the specific speech under discussion: what he said was that "the occupation regime over Jerusalem should vanish from the page of time." No state action is envisaged in this lament; it denotes a spiritual wish, whereas the erroneous translation – "wipe Israel off the map" – suggests a military threat. There is a huge chasm between the correct and the incorrect translations. The notion that Iran can "wipe out" U.S.-backed, nuclear-armed Israel is ludicrous
In a June 11, 2006 analysis of the translation controversy, New York Times editor Ethan Bronner stated:
[T]ranslators in Tehran who work for the president's office and the foreign ministry disagree with them. All official translations of Mr. Ahmadinejad's statement, including a description of it on his website, refer to wiping Israel away. Sohrab Mahdavi, one of Iran’s most prominent translators, and Siamak Namazi, managing director of a Tehran consulting firm, who is bilingual, both say “wipe off” or “wipe away” is more accurate than "vanish" because the Persian verb is active and transitive.
The situation in the Middle East is akin to being a boil on the ass of the World. Antibiotics haven't worked, and scratching that festering wound has only made it worse. It's time to let it run it's own course, and deal with the scar later.
Of course Iran wants to defend itself, its weapons are defensive.