It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by blackcube
A catholic church University is an employer (business).
The teachers are their employees and so it include insurance policy in the employment pack. University offer insurance to students too.
The gov. say the Insurance companies MUST pay for contraception pills.
Do you think these universities/colleges/schools can opt out from any employment contracts under the law because their god says so? Of course not.
I m pretty sure these universities aren't free, private universities. People pay money to them to study there. Stop using religion talk here... ITS BUSINESS.
RESUME:
Gov says: Insurance companies need pay for contraception pills for their clients...
Insurance companies don't want because it means... they will lose money. Use a bunch religions arguments as excuse.
End of story.edit on 4/3/12 by blackcube because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
If the Catholic church doesn't want others to impose their beliefs on them, they shouldn't impose their religion on others.
BC is not abortifacients, it does not cause an abortion.
Originally posted by blackcube
A catholic church University is an employer (business)..
Originally posted by iamconcerned
reply to post by FlyersFan
Awesome post. I love how he has no response about the Catholic hospital closing. If I was a Catholic hospital, DONATING MY TIME AND MONEY FOR FREE, and I had to deal with ungrateful dbags trying to fourth reich me, I would absolutely shut down. People like the O.P. don't deserve all the millions of hours those nuns put in caring for sick people for FREE. They should pay the going rate, who gives a crap if they are poor. No money, no bed! Charity is for religious Fascists!
Originally posted by dawnstar
reply to post by AuntB
um....I imagine that chemotherapy would be out of your budget also...
this is why we have insurance!!!
why should women's reproductive care be left out, exactly???
by what I understood from reading through the posts was that the lady was speaking about a friend, who was using the pill, not because she didn't want to becomes pregnant, but rather, to prevent a serious health problem from developing!!! she wasn't insured for it, obviously the sacrifice that she would have had to endure to obtain it was big enough to feel that the risks involve was worth taken! and well....come to find out, the the risk became a reality!
so, do we taxpayers, does you employer, does your fellow insurance pool members pay for your coverage for the flu shot?? what about your blood pressure medicine??
Originally posted by Ahabstar
reply to post by Muttley2012
No, but let's say you work for a Catholic Private School that self-insures. You don't have to be Catholic to work there. Can you demand that they provide you with birth control when it counters their religious beliefs?
Originally posted by iamconcerned
reply to post by mastahunta
'Who paid for my bubble?
is this like an inquisition thats starting in America? I paid for that toilet seat you sat on when
you were at the park.'
Sorry you misunderstood. I'm willing to bet money you don't earn your rent. You know like, with a like, job. Perhaps that is a bit clearer for you. Half of these entitlement threads are people in college or people living at their parents. I need the beer money, please someone bet me.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by mastahunta
The 1st amendment is not a tool for religious Fascists to use as a dictating implement.
The 1st amendment is there to protect religious liberties from people like you who want to impose your own morals on others. Kinda funny, considering that is exactly what people like you complain that the other side does.
This thread =edit on 3/4/2012 by FlyersFan because: typo
Originally posted by hangedman13
reply to post by mastahunta
I also know you can go and get a prescription for erectile disfunction pills, why should someone have to pay for your hard on? As it is, the company she works for does not have to pay for it if they disagree on religious grounds, so what now?
That is because erectile disfunction is a pre-existing condition, where the pill and other contraceptives do not treat one. Hence why insurance companies as a rule don't cover contraceptives, they don't treat anything usually. However the pill is sometimes used to treat hormone issues where it actually is used as a treatment!edit on 3-3-2012 by hangedman13 because: (no reason given)edit on 3-3-2012 by hangedman13 because: oops
Originally posted by daskakik
Originally posted by WTFover
JD and Coke are not healthcare products.
Umm..neither is Birth Control, except when you have some kind of health issue that the hormones can help with, and then I do believe it is already covered. Saying something to keep you from getting knocked up so you can do whatever you want sexually is a health care product is absurd. Then Condoms are a health care product too. Which they're not.
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by Muttley2012
Originally posted by WTFover
But, the fact is, no matter how many "reasons" you dream up, that pesky little First Amendment just keeps getting in your way.
That is the heart of the issue and all the Sandra Flukes in the world won't change it.
What does the first amendment have to do with birth control?
Its another typical right wing way to instill their Fascist ideas on America,
just like Citizens Untied. Constitution is toilet paper to be used like toilet
paper I guess.