It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The issue at hand is whether or not religious institutions should have the right to impose their religious views on their employees to the extent that they can prevent them from taking certain medications
Originally posted by Muttley2012
Originally posted by Ahabstar
reply to post by Muttley2012
No, but let's say you work for a Catholic Private School that self-insures. You don't have to be Catholic to work there. Can you demand that they provide you with birth control when it counters their religious beliefs?
Yes, because your rights end where mine begin and vice versa. If you have a religious belief against birth control, fine, don't take it. However, if I want birth control, you have no right to imposes your belief system upon my person.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by Muttley2012
Originally posted by WTFover
But, the fact is, no matter how many "reasons" you dream up, that pesky little First Amendment just keeps getting in your way.
That is the heart of the issue and all the Sandra Flukes in the world won't change it.
What does the first amendment have to do with birth control?
Its another typical right wing way to instill their Fascist ideas on America,
just like Citizens Untied. Constitution is toilet paper to be used like toilet
paper I guess.
Wrong.
Ignoring the First Amendment and forcing religious people to ignore their religion in violation of Constitutional guarantees is the LEFT wing method of installing their Fascist ideas on America.
Instead, Fascists will try to employ force to impose THEIR ideas on the unwilling.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Ignoring the First Amendment and forcing religious people to ignore their religion in violation of Constitutional guarantees is the LEFT wing method of installing their Fascist ideas on America.
Here's a novel idea - don't like their rules on what insurance covers? Go to a different school. Work for a different employer. Buy your own damned independent insurance.
Instead, Fascists will try to employ force to impose THEIR ideas on the unwilling.
Originally posted by Masterjaden
reply to post by mastahunta
No one is stopping anyone from using a different insurance... It is their right believing that it is not right to supply birth control to NOT supply birth control. Forcing them to do otherwise is violating their right to follow their religious beliefs.
Jaden
Originally posted by mastahunta
Yes and there is an opt out option and in the case of WTF's point there is going to be a dialogue
to resolve the conflict.
Originally posted by WTFover
Originally posted by mastahunta
Yes and there is an opt out option and in the case of WTF's point there is going to be a dialogue
to resolve the conflict.
What dialogue? "We need to pass the bill, so we can see what's in it"??? That kind of dialogue? There will be no dialogue. Obama will issue an "edict". Then, the SCOTUS will spank his ass with the correct decision, that the government can not prohibit the free exercise of religion.edit on 4-3-2012 by WTFover because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by nenothtu
Wrong.
Ignoring the First Amendment and forcing religious people to ignore their religion in violation of Constitutional guarantees is the LEFT wing method of installing their Fascist ideas on America.
Of is that right? I guess allowing billionaires and foreign money to be the major dictate in our elective
process is no biggy? Protect them and the money... I mean free speech
Instead, Fascists will try to employ force to impose THEIR ideas on the unwilling.
The GOP wanting to stick camera's up women, based upon their moral reservations,
I get it.
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by nenothtu
Ignoring the First Amendment and forcing religious people to ignore their religion in violation of Constitutional guarantees is the LEFT wing method of installing their Fascist ideas on America.
Here's a novel idea - don't like their rules on what insurance covers? Go to a different school. Work for a different employer. Buy your own damned independent insurance.
Instead, Fascists will try to employ force to impose THEIR ideas on the unwilling.
The church
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by Masterjaden
reply to post by mastahunta
No one is stopping anyone from using a different insurance... It is their right believing that it is not right to supply birth control to NOT supply birth control. Forcing them to do otherwise is violating their right to follow their religious beliefs.
Jaden
Yes and there is an opt out option and in the case of WTF's point there is going to be a dialogue
to resolve the conflict.
Originally posted by MountainLaurel
We pay for people's "vices" all the time, obesity, drinking, smoking, etc. are all factored into insurance rates wether you do them or not, and most don't consider sex a "vice" but a normal and important part of a healthy persons life. This is just silliness and lacks commen sense.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by MountainLaurel
We pay for people's "vices" all the time, obesity, drinking, smoking, etc. are all factored into insurance rates wether you do them or not, and most don't consider sex a "vice" but a normal and important part of a healthy persons life. This is just silliness and lacks commen sense.
I don't pay for other people's vices, and I'm mildly curious as to why you do. If you just want to, that's fine by me, but I don't. I have my own vices to shoulder the bill for. No one else is paying for mine, nor would I expect them to.
Anything becomes a vice when taken to excess - and doing more than you can pay for on your own qualifies.
Originally posted by WTFover
Originally posted by mastahunta
The 1st amendment is not a tool for religious Fascists to use as a dictating implement.
That is a bologna cover so zealots can inflict morality upon others.
The First Amendment (capitalized to give it the distinction it deserves) is a defense against anti-religion totalitarians, who wish to "inflict" their beliefs upon others.
No one has, is or will be refused the right to obtain contraceptives.
Originally posted by MountainLaurel
I don't "willingly" pay for other's vices, I'm just pointing out that they are still factored into the insurance premiums we pay wether we do them or not.
If a person has insurance, through thier employer, which in most cases they do pay for in someway through co-pays, etc. why shouldn't they be allowed to use it as they and their doctor see fit?edit on 5-3-2012 by MountainLaurel because: spelling
Originally posted by mastahunta
Originally posted by Ahabstar
reply to post by Muttley2012
For some religious beliefs, birth control is a sin and sex for pleasure versus procreation is a sin. Having the government forcing their adherence to a law that counters that religious belief would violate the First Amendment, specifically freedom of religion.edit on 3-3-2012 by Ahabstar because: (no reason given)
so people can chose not to talk that pill or wear a condom.
I mean this is the biggest farce I have ever seen.
How many times has someone FORCED you to wear a condom?