It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by KingMobi
A judge should always be unbiased, yes that's true. If a Muslim never insults Jesus, Moses, David or Solomon; then why does the followers of Jesus/Moses/David/Solomon insult Prophet Mohammad (or even his followes)?
Apart from the decision this judge took (even if you recall it as biased), Christians and Jews from all around the world have always been unsympathetic with Muslims, isn't this also a fact?edit on 26-2-2012 by KingMobi because: (no reason given)
as reported by Yahoo and inferred by other posters on this thread.
Judge Martin threw the case out on the grounds that Elbayomy was obligated to attack Perce because of his culture and religion.
As far as dismissing the charges for lack of evidence, the suspect is changing his story / account. He first stated he made contact and under cross examination changed his story.
I agree, I just havent heard the Judge suggest that anywhere...I cannot match it to his remarks on the vid. The media and bloggs you have been reading are wrong. Just like they were wrong RE: the supposed 'media blackout' of a grooming trial here in the UK.
Im tired of the PC police trying to downplay these incidents. We have laws in this country that protect our freedom of thought / expression / religion / etc. No where in our laws does it say one religion has more protection than another religion.
Again we agree, with one added qualification. I dont want any religious criminal laws full stop (thats period to you ) If people wish to seek a religious ruling on some very limited civil matters then thats up to them. UK/ US law will allways be supreme.
If people wish to live their life under Islam / Sharia law thats fine and is there choice. However they must understand that they are still subject to the laws of the City / State / Federal.
.If that is something they don't want to abide by, then feel free to move to a different country that is more in line with your line of thinking.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Christianity, Islam, Judaism - All of these 3 major religions contain a history of violence, death and destruction. In my opinion (my opinion) 2 of the 3 religions have done a better job in moving the religious thinking forward to take into account the change in society over the centuries.
edit on 26-2-2012 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by FlyersFan
The victim is owed an apology by both the perp and the judge.
The perp should be in jail and in anger managment classes.
The judge should be thrown off the bench and sent back to law school.
Originally posted by Ironclad
reply to post by newcovenant
Ahhh but it rally dosen't have to be a written or recorded law.
If a muslim man beheads his daughter for refusing to marry a muslim man, in down town NY city, he can say it was a shame to Islam and his lawyers could quote this case. He could get off on religious grounds, etc, etc, etc..
Not likely to ever happen, but this is fundimentally one way prior judicial descisions can affect and change (ammend) laws.edit on 2/26/2012 by Ironclad because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sablicious
What a retarded kangaroo court.
So effectively it's acceptable to commit violent acts against someone who parodies a fictitious entity?
My god... What's the West coming to? I guess next we'll be drawing and quartering the George Carlins of the world
Originally posted by buster2010
reply to post by ollncasino
You can show the hate in any religion.
This is just disgusting. It also claims that this judge is a muslim convert. looks like creeping sharia law and clear conflict of interest.